Evidence of cryptic species in the genus Tinaminyssus (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) based on morphometrical and molecular data
The study of cryptic species allows to describe and to understand biodiversity, and the evolutionary processes shaping it. Mites of the family Rhinonyssidae are permanent parasites of the nasal cavities of birds, currently including about 500 described species and 12 genera. Here, we tested the hypothesis that mites from five populations of the genus Tinaminyssus—three isolated from European turtle doves (Streptopelia turtur), and two from Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto; Aves: Columbiformes)—are, in fact, two cryptic species inhabiting different hosts. First, we performed a morphometrical study on 16 traits. Then, we used the ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 nuclear region (ITS region), and a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c-oxidase 1 (COI) to carry out phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses on Tinaminyssus species. Morphological analyses revealed a lack of biometric differentiation among Tinaminyssus populations from the two host species. However, molecular analyses indicated a high degree of genetic differentiation between populations of Tinaminyssus sp. from S. turtur and S. decaocto. Overall, results show that they can be considered as different cryptic species, suggesting a case of evolutionary stasis, likely because of the anatomical similarity between closely-related bird host species.
KeywordsCOI DNA barcoding ITS region Mites Molecular systematics Rhinonyssidae
The present work was supported by a grant from the V Plan Propio de Investigación of the University of Seville, Spain. We thank to Centro Municipal Zoosanitario de Sevilla, and especially to Mr. Francisco Peña Fernández and Mr. Rafael Cuadrado Nieto for providing some of the samples. We also thank to Mr. Geoffrey Giddings for the critical reading of the manuscript.
- Butenko OM (1984) Rhinonyssid mites of non-passerine birds of the USSR. Academy of Sciences of USSR, MoscowGoogle Scholar
- de Rojas M, Úbeda JM, Cutillas C, Mora D, Ariza C, Guevara DC (2007) Utility of ITS1-58S-ITS2 and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences for species identification and phylogenetic inference within the genus Rhinonyssus: the Rhinonyssus coniventris complex. Parasitol Res 100:1041–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimov ID (2012) Epizootological study of spreading of the Rhinonyssid mites in nasal cavities of birds from Northwest Russia. Second international epizootiology days. Belgrade. pp 176–181Google Scholar
- Fain A (1957) Essai de classification des Rhinonyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) avec description de deux genres nouveaux. Ann Parasitol 31:145–157Google Scholar
- Fain A (1962) Les rhinonyssides parasites des pigeons (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Rev Zool Bot Afr 65:305–324Google Scholar
- Fain A (1963) Le complexe ‘Rhinonyssus coniventris’ (Rhinonyssidae: Mesostigmata). Bull Ann Soc R Ent Belg 99(3):86–100Google Scholar
- George E (1961) The nasal mites of the genus Ptilonyssus (Acarina: Rhinonyssidae) occurring in some north American passeriform birds. Kans Entomol Soc 34:105–132Google Scholar
- Morelli M, Spicer GS (2007) Cospeciation between the nasal mite Ptilonyssus sairae (Acari: Rhinonyssidae) and its bird hosts. Syst Appl Acarol 12:179–188Google Scholar
- Porter JC, Strandtmann RW (1952) Nasal mites of the English sparrow. Tex J Sci 4:393–399Google Scholar
- Radovsky FJ (1985) Evolution of mammalian mesostigmate mites. In: Kim KC (ed) Coevolution of parasitic arthropods and mammals. Wiley, New York, pp 441–504Google Scholar
- Rodríguez Braza MB, Guevara Benítez DC, Úbeda Ontiveros JM (1990) Ácaros del género Tinamimyssus Strandtman y Wharton, 1958, parásitos nasícolas de aves ciconiformes y columbiformes españolas: T. bubulci (Zumpt y Till, 1955) Pence, 1972 y T. melloi streptopeliae (Fain, 1962). Rev Iber Parasitol 50(1–2):73–80Google Scholar