Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 35–47 | Cite as

Predation risk-mediated maternal effects in the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae

  • Julia Freinschlag
  • Peter SchausbergerEmail author


Predation risk is a strong selective force shaping prey morphology, physiology, life history and/or behavior. As a prime stressor, predation risk may even induce trans-generational alterations, called maternal effects. Accordingly, maternal predation risk during offspring production may influence offspring life history and anti-predator behavior. Here, we assessed whether different levels of predation risk, posed by the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis, induce graded maternal effects in its prey, the herbivorous two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. First, we generated four types of predation risk-stressed spider mite mothers by exposing them to living predators, direct and indirect predator cue combinations or no predator cues, respectively. Then, we investigated the life history (offspring developmental time, sex) and anti-predator response (activity, position on the leaf) of their offspring on leaves with and without direct and indirect predator cues. Maternal stress, no matter of the predation risk level, prolonged the offspring developmental time, as compared to offspring from unstressed mothers. This pattern was more pronounced on leaves with than without predator cues. Offspring from stressed mothers resided more likely on the leaf blade than close to the leaf vein. Offspring sex ratio and activity were not influenced by maternal predation risk but activity was higher on leaves with than without predator cues. We argue that the prolonged developmental time is non-adaptive, yet the changed site preference is adaptive because reducing the encounter likelihood with predators. Our study represents a key example for predation risk-mediated maternal effects on developmental trajectories of offspring.


Anti-predator behavior Life history Maternal effect Predation risk 



We thank I.C. Christiansen and M. Seiter for comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Ambichl A (2013) Maternale Effekte bei der Raubmilbe Neoseiulus californicus: Einfluss der Mutternahrung auf die Nahrungspräferenz der Nachkommen. Diplomarbeit, Universität für Bodenkultur WienGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo J (1996) Maternal effects in animal ecology. Am Zool 36:83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwood JS, Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Prey stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environ Entomol 30:1103–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolland HR, Gutierrez J, Flechtmann CHW (1998) World catalogue of the spider mite family (Acari, Tetranychidae). Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Coslovsky M, Richner H (2012) Preparing offspring for a dangerous world: potential costs of being wrong. PLoS One 7:e48840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dicke M, Grostal P (2001) Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feiertag-Koppen CCM, Pijnacker LP (1985) Oogenesis. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests, vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–127Google Scholar
  8. Fernández-Ferrari MC, Schausberger P (2013) From repulsion to attraction: species- and spatial context-dependent threat sensitive response of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae to predatory mite cues. Naturwissenschaften 100:541–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerson U, Smiley RL, Ochoa R (2003) Mites (Acari) for pest control. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grostal P, Dicke M (1999) Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behav Ecol 10:422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackl T, Schausberger P (2014) Learned predation risk management by spider mites. Front Ecol Evol 2:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helfman GS (1989) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helle W, Sabelis MW (1985a) Spider mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests, vol 1A. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Helle W, Sabelis MW (1985b) Spider mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests, vol 1B. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoy MA (2011) Agricultural acarology: introduction to integrated mite management. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson DE, Martin S (2010) Sex allocation: size matters for red spider mites. Curr Biol 20:R1080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kats L, Dill L (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394Google Scholar
  18. Kriesch S, Dicke M (1997) Avoidance of predatory mites by the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae: the role of infochemicals. Proc Exp App Entomol 8:121–126Google Scholar
  19. Lima SL (1998) Non-lethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions—What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience 48:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 98:619–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCormick MI (2009) Indirect effects of heterospecific interactions on progeny size through maternal stress. Oikos 118:744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGhee KE, Pintor LM, Suhr EL, Bell AM (2012) Maternal exposure to predation risk decreases offspring antipredator behavior and survival in three-spined stickleback. Funct Ecol 26:932–940CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mommer BC, Bell AM (2013) A test of maternal programming of offspring stress response to predation risk in threespine sticklebacks. Physiol Behav 122:222–227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:403–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Oku K, Yano S (2008) Effects of predation risk on mating behavior of the Kanzawa spider mite. J Ethol 26:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peralta-Quesada PC, Schausberger P (2012) Prenatal chemosensory learning by the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus. PLoS One 7:e53229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Roche DP, McGhee KE, Bell AM (2012) Maternal predator-exposure has lifelong consequences for offspring learning in threespined sticklebacks. Proc R Soc B 8:932–935Google Scholar
  29. Sabelis MW, Dicke M (1985) Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests, vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 141–160Google Scholar
  30. Saino N, Romano M, Ferrari RP, Martinelli R, Møller AP (2005) Stressed mothers lay eggs with high corticosterone levels which produce low quality offspring. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol 303A:998–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seiter M, Schausberger P (2015) Maternal intraguild predation risk affects offspring anti-predator behavior and learning in mites. Sci Rep 5:15046CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Shine R, Downes SJ (1999) Can pregnant lizards adjust their offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions? Oecologia 119:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Škaloudová B, Zemek R, Krivan V (2007) The effect of predation risk on an acarine system. Anim Behav 74:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Storm J, Lima SL (2010) Mothers forewarn offspring about predators: a transgenerational maternal effect on behavior. Am Nat 175:382–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stratman A, Taborsky A (2014) Antipredator defences of young are independently determined by genetic inheritance, maternal effects and own early experience in mouthbrooding cichlids. Funct Ecol 28:944–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Leeuwen T, Vontas J, Tsagkarakou A, Dermauw W, Tirry L (2010) Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: a review. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40:563–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Walzer A, Schausberger P (2011) Threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predation behaviour: maternal strategies to reduce offspring predation risk in mites. Anim Behav 88:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolf JB, Wade MJ (2009) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Proc R Soc B 364:1107–1115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Group of Arthropod Ecology and Behavior, Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Behavioural BiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations