Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Behaviour of coconut mites preceding take-off to passive aerial dispersal

  • J. W. S. Melo
  • D. B. Lima
  • M. W. Sabelis
  • A. Pallini
  • M. G. C. GondimJr.
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

For more than three decades the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer is one of the most important pests of coconut palms and has recently spread to many coconut production areas worldwide. Colonization of coconut palms is thought to arise from mites dispersing aerially after take-off from other plants within the same plantation or other plantations. The underlying dispersal behaviour of the mite at take-off, in the airborne state and after landing is largely unknown and this is essential to understand how they spread from tree to tree. In this article we studied whether take-off to aerial dispersal of coconut mites is preceded by characteristic behaviour, whether there is a correlation between the body position preceding aerial dispersal and the direction of the wind, and whether the substrate (outer surface of coconut bracts or epidermis) and the wind speed matter to the decision to take-off. We found that take-off can sometimes be preceded by a raised body stance, but more frequently take-off occurs while the mite is walking or resting on its substrate. Coconut mites that become airborne assumed a body stance that had no relation to the wind direction. Take-off was suppressed on a substrate providing food to coconut mites, but occurred significantly more frequently on the outer surface of coconut bracts than on the surface of the fruit. For both substrates, take-off frequency increased with wind speed. We conclude that coconut mites have at least some degree of control over take-off for aerial dispersal and that there is as yet no reason to infer that a raised body stance is necessary to become airborne.

Keywords

Take-off Dispersal posture Aceria guerreronis Eriophyidae Cocos nucifera 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Izabela Lesna for critical reading of the manuscript. The research reported in this manuscript was supported by a grant to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq – MCTI no 14/2012 (Proc. 472713/2012-4)] from the Brazilian government. J.W.S. Melo was additionally supported by a grant to the CNPq [MCT nº 70/2009 (Proc. 147462/2010-0) and SWE/CSF (Proc. 202488/2011-0)]. The manuscript is part of J.W.S. Melo’s PhD thesis.

References

  1. Aratchige NS, Sabelis MW, Lesna I (2007) Plant structural changes due to herbivory: do changes in Aceria-infested coconut fruits allow predatory mites to move under the perianth? Exp Appl Acarol 43:97–107PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergh JC (2001) Ecology and aerobiology of dispersing citrus rust mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) in central Florida. Environ Entomol 30(2):318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergh JC, McCoy CW (1997) Aerial dispersal of citrus rust mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) from Florida citrus groves. Environ Entomol 26:256–264Google Scholar
  5. Bergh JC, Weiss CR (1993) Pear rust mite, Epitrimerus pyri (Acarina: Eriophyoidae) oviposition and nymphal development on Pyrus and non-Pyrus hosts. Exp Appl Acarol 17:215–224Google Scholar
  6. Davis R (1964) Autoecological studies of Rhynacus breitlowi Davis (Acarina: Eriophyoidae). Fla Entomol 47:113–121Google Scholar
  7. Duffner K, Schruft G, Guggenheim R (2001) Passive dispersal of the grape rust mite Calepitrimerus vitis Nalepa 1905 (Acari, Eriophyoidea) in vineyards. J Pest Sci 74:1–6Google Scholar
  8. Frost WE (1997) Polyphenic wax production in Abacarus (Acari: Eriophyidae), and implications for migratory fitness. Physiol Entomol 22:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvão AS, Gondim MGC Jr, Michereff SJ (2008) Escala diagramática de dano de Aceria guerreronis Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) em coqueiro. Neotrop Entomol 37:723–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galvão AS, Gondim MGC Jr, de Moraes GJ, Melo JWS (2011) Distribution of Aceria guerreronis and Neoseiulus baraki among and within coconut bunches in northeast Brazil. Exp Appl Acarol 54:373–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvão AS, Melo JWS, Monteiro VB, Lima DB, de Moraes GJ, Gondim MGC Jr (2012) Dispersal strategies of Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae), a coconut pest. Exp Appl Acarol 57:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson WW, Painter RH (1957) Transportation by aphids of the wheat curl mite, Aceria tulipae (K.), a vector of the wheat streak mosaic virus. J Kansas Entomol Soc 30:147–153Google Scholar
  13. Howard FW, Abreu-Rodriguez E, Denmark HA (1990) Geographical and seasonal distribution of the coconut mite, Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae), in Puerto Rico and Florida, USA. J Agric Univ 74:237–251Google Scholar
  14. Huffaker CB, Van de Vrie MJ, McMurtry JA (1969) The ecology of Tetranychidae mites and their natural control. Annu Rev Entomol 14:125–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeppson LR, Keifer HH, Baker EW (1975) Mites injurious to economic plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 614Google Scholar
  16. Lawson-Balagbo LM, Gondim MGC Jr, de Moraes GJ, Hanna R, Schausberger P (2007) Refuge use by the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis fine scale distribution and association with other mites under the perianth. Biol Control 43:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawson-Balagbo LM, Gondim MGC Jr, de Moraes GJ, Hanna R, Schausberger P (2008) Exploration of the acarine fauna on coconut palm in Brazil with emphasis on Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae) and its natural enemies. Bull Entomol Res 98:83–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesna I, Conijn CGM, Sabelis MW (2004) From biological control biological insight; rust-mite induced change in bulb morphology, a new mode of indirect plant defense. Phytophaga 14:285–291Google Scholar
  19. Lindquist EE, Oldfield CN (1996) Evolution and phylogeny: evolution of eriophyoid mites in relation to their host plant. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, world crop pest, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 277–300Google Scholar
  20. Manson DCM, Gerson U (1996) Web spinning, wax secretion and liquid secretion by eriophyoid mites. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, World Crop Pest, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 251–258Google Scholar
  21. Mariau D (1977) Aceria (Eriophyes) guerreronis: un important ravageur des cocoteraies africaines et américaines. Oléagineux 32:101–108Google Scholar
  22. Mariau D, Julia JF (1970) L´acariose a Aceria guerreronis (Keifer), ravageur du cocotier. Oléagineux 25:459–464Google Scholar
  23. Melo JWS, Lima DB, Pallini A, Oliveira JEM, Gondim MGC Jr (2011) Olfactory response of predatory mites to vegetative and reproductive parts of coconut palm infested by Aceria guerreronis. Exp Appl Acarol 55:191–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melo JWS, Domingos CA, Pallini A, Oliveira JEM, Gondim MGC Jr (2012) Removal of bunches or spikelets is not effective for the control of Aceria guerreronis. HortScience 47:1–5Google Scholar
  25. Melo JWS, Lima DB, Sabelis MW, Pallini A, Gondim Jr MGC (2014) Limits to ambulatory displacement of coconut mites in absence and presence of food-related cues. Exp Appl Acarol. 62:449–461Google Scholar
  26. Michalska K, Skoracka A, Navia D, Amrine JW Jr (2010) Behavioural studies on eriophyoid mites—an overview. Exp Appl Acarol 51:31–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore D, Alexander L (1987) Aspects of migration and colonization of the coconut palm by the coconut mite, Eriophyes guerreronis (Keifer) (Acari: Eriophyidae). Bull Entomol Res 77:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore D, Howard FW (1996) Coconuts. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 561–570Google Scholar
  29. Nault LR, Styer WE (1969) The dispersal of Aceria tulipae and three other grass-infesting eriophyid mites in Ohio. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1443–1455Google Scholar
  30. Negloh K, Hanna R, Schausberger P (2010) Season- and fruit age-dependent population dynamics of Aceria guerreronis and its associated predatory mite Neoseiulus paspalivorus on coconut in Benin. Biol Control 54:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oldfield GN (1996) Diversity and host plant specifity. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites-their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, World Crop Pests, vol 6, pp 199–216Google Scholar
  32. Ozman SK, Goolbsby JA (2005) Biology and phenology of the eriophyid mite Floracarus perrepae, on its native host in Australia, old world climbing fern Lygodium microphyllum. Exp Appl Acarol 35:197–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabelis MW, Bruin J (1996) Evolutionary ecology; life history patterns, food plant choice and dispersal. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 329–366Google Scholar
  34. SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT User’s guide, version 8.02, TS level 2MO. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  35. Schlichting H (1968) Boundary-Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Seguni Z (2002) Incidence, distribution and economic importance of the coconut eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis Keifer in Tanzanian coconut based cropping systems. In: Fernando LCP, de Moraes GJ, Wickramananda IR (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on coconut mite (Aceria guerreronis). Coconut Research Institute, Sri Lanka, pp 54–57Google Scholar
  37. Shvanderov FA (1975) The role of phoresy in the migration of eriophyid mites (Eriophyoidea). Zool Zh 54:458–461Google Scholar
  38. Smith BD (1960) The behaviour of the black currant gall mite (Phytoptus ribi Nal.) during the free living phase of its life cycle. Ann Rep Long Ashton Agric Hort Res Sta 1959:130–136Google Scholar
  39. Sternlicht M, Goldenberg S, Cohen M (1973) Development of the plum gall and trials to control its mites Acalitus phloeocoptes (Eriophyoidae, Acarina). Ann Zool Ecol Anim 5:365–377Google Scholar
  40. Thirumalai Thevan PS, Muthukrishman N, Manoharan T, Thangaraj T (2004) Influence of phenotypic and biochemical factors of coconut on eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis Keifer and predatory, Amblyseius spp. mite. J Entomol Res 28:291–299Google Scholar
  41. Westphal, E, Manson DCM (1996) Feeding effects on host plants: gall formation and other distortions. In: Lindquist E, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (Eds) Eriophyoid mites their biology, natural enemies and control, World Crop Pests, Vol. 6, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 231–242Google Scholar
  42. Zhao S, Amrine JW Jr (1997a) A new method for studying aerial dispersal behaviour of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea). Syst Appl Acarol 2:107–110Google Scholar
  43. Zhao S, Amrine JW Jr (1997b) Investigation of snowborne mites (Acari) and relevance to dispersal. Int JAcarol 23:209–213Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. S. Melo
    • 1
  • D. B. Lima
    • 1
  • M. W. Sabelis
    • 2
  • A. Pallini
    • 3
  • M. G. C. GondimJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Depto. AgronomiaUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Depto. EntomologiaUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations