Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 79–85

Evaluation of the benefits of a myrmecophilous oribatid mite, Aribates javensis, to a myrmicine ant, Myrmecina sp.

Article

Abstract

I studied the myrmicine ant Myrmecina sp. A in West Java, Indonesia, which had the obligately myrmecophilous oribatid mite Aribates javensis in its nests. The oribatid mites cannot survive without ant attendance. The ants rarely eat living mites, but they feed on the mites in case of food shortage and after death of the mites. I examined the effects of the oribatid mites as food on the host ants. Egg production by ergatoid (i.e. permanently wingless) queens and larval survival of ant colonies, as well as survival and egg laying of isolated ant workers were investigated. The presence of oribatid mites had no effects on egg production by ergatoid queens and survival of the ant larvae neither in the presence of abundant food nor under starvation conditions. Survival of adult workers was not affected by the presence of oribatid mites, but egg production by workers was significantly enhanced by feeding on mites. The present results indicate that the oribatid mites had slight but significant nutritional effects on the host ants.

Keywords

Ant Aribates Mutualism Myrmecina Myrmecophily Oribatid mite 

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki J, Ito F (1996) A new species of oribatid mite collected from ant nests in oriental tropics. J Acarol Soc Jap 6:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki J, Takaku G, Ito F (1994) Aribatidae, a new myrmecophilous oribatid mite family from Java. Int J Acarol 20:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley BL (1987) Ant–plant–homopteran interactions. Adv Ecol Res 16:53–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cushman JH, Beattie AJ (1991) Mutualism: assessing the benefits to hosts and visitors. Trends Ecol Evol 6:193–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cushman JH, Rashbrook VK, Beattie AJ (1994) Assessing benefits to both participants in a Lycaenid-ant association. Ecology 75:1031–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels H, Cottsberger G, Fielder K (2005) Nutrient composition of larval nectar secretions from three species of myrmecophilous butterflies. J Chem Ecol 31:2805–2821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eickwort GC (1990) Associations of mites with social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 35:469–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiedler K, Saam C (1995) Ants benefit from attending facultatively myrmecophilous Lycaenidae caterpillars: evidence from a survival study. Oecologia 104:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  12. Inoue T, Nakamura K, Salmah S, Abbas I (1993) Poulation dynamics of animals in unpredictably changing tropical environments. J Biosci 18:425–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ito F (1996) Colony composition of an Indonesian myrmicine ant Myrmecina sp. A: polygynous reproduction by ergatoid queens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 89:550–554Google Scholar
  14. Ito F, Aoki J (2003) Bionomics of the myrmecophilous oribatid mites Protoribates myrmecophilus (Acari: Oribatida) in the oriental tropics. J Nat Hist 37:2383–2391Google Scholar
  15. Ito F, Takaku G (1994) Obligate myrmecophily in an oribatid mite: novel symbiont of ants in oriental tropics. Naturwissenschaften 81:180–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janson L, Mallott L, Mcginty L (2002) Soil temperature and arthropod abundance are lower near ant mounds. Tillers 3:15–19Google Scholar
  17. Kistner DH (1979) Social and evolutionary significance of social insect symbionts. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 339–413Google Scholar
  18. Masuko K (1994) Specialized predation on oribatid mites by two species of the ant genus Myrmecina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 101:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ôkido H (2002) Revision of the ant genus Myrmecina from Asia (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Dissertation, Kyushu UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Pierce NE, Mead PS (1981) Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly larvae and ants. Science 112:1185–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB, Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu Rev Entomol 47:733–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid-ant interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2008) Mutualism: ants and their partners. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsuji K, Ohkawara K, Ito F (2001) Inter-nest relationship in the Indonesian ant, Myrmecina sp. A with some considerations for the evolution of unicoloniality in ants. Tropics 10:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson EO (2005) Oribatid mite predation by small ants of the genus Pheidole. Insect Soc 52:263–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of AgricultureKagawa UniversityIkenobe, MikiJapan

Personalised recommendations