Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 313–320 | Cite as

Life history differences between two forms of the social spider mite, Stigmaeopsis miscanthi



The two forms of Stigmaeopsis miscanthi (Saito) (called LW and HG) differ in their levels of male-to-male aggression, differ in their diapause attributes, and morphologically in the male leg I armor. Furthermore, a type of reproductive isolation exists between the forms, although some one-way compatibility is maintained. Here we looked for any differences in life history traits between the two forms under experimental conditions. The intrinsic rate of natural increase (r m ) of the LW form was lower than that of the HG form, the difference seemingly caused by the developmental speed of the latter. Although the developmental speeds of HG under several temperature regimens were significantly higher than those of LW, the low development threshold temperatures of the two forms were almost identical. This study addresses why a significant difference in r m exists in relation to other behavior and physiological (diapause) adaptations.


Male aggression Intrinsic rate of natural increase Diapause Low development threshold temperature Inbreeding depression 



We thank Drs. M. W. Sabelis, T. Takada, K. Sahara, K. Ito, T. Sakagami, K. Mori and Mr. Y. Uchida for their valuable comments and help. We also thank Dr. A.R. Chittenden for English editing and valuable suggestions. This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid no. 23405005 and 24570013 for Scientific Research (B) from JSPS.


  1. Henrich VC, Denlinger DL (1982) Selection for late pupariation affects diapause incidence and duration in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata. Physiol Entomol 7:407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lewontin RC (1965) Selection for colonizing ability. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 79–94Google Scholar
  3. Mori K, Saito Y, Sakagami T, Sahara K (2005) Inbreeding depression of female fecundity by genetic factors retained in natural populations of a male-haploid social mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp Appl Acarol 36:15–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Razmjou J, Vorburger C, Tavakkoli H (2009) Comparative population growth parameters of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), on different common bean cultivars. Syst Appl Acarol 14(2):83–90Google Scholar
  5. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Saito Y (1995) Clinal variation in male-to-male antagonism and weaponry in a subsocial mite. Evolution 49:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Saito Y (2000) Do kin selection and intra-sexual selection operate in spider mites? Exp Appl Acarol 24:351–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Saito Y (2010) Plant mites and sociality. Diversity and evolution. Springer, TokyoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saito Y, Mori K, Sakagami T, Lin JZ (2004) Reinstatement of the genus Stigmaeopsis Banks, with descriptions of two new species (Acari, Tetranychidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:635–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saito Y, Sahara K (1999) Two clinal trends in male–male aggressiveness in a subsocial spider mite. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saito Y, Sahara K, Mori K (2000) Inbreeding depression by recessive deleterious genes affecting female fecundity of a haplo-diploid mite. J Evol Biol 13:668–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saito Y, Sakagami T, Sahara K (2002) Differences in diapause attributes between two clinal forms distingushed by male-to-male aggression in a subsocial spider mite, Schizotetranychus miscanthi Saito. Ecol Res 17:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saito Y, Suzuki R (1987) Reexamination of several rearing methods for studying the life history of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Appl Entomol Zool 22:570–576Google Scholar
  14. Saito Y, Takahashi K (1982) Study on variation of Schizotetranychus celarius (Banks) II. Comparison of mode of life between two sympatric forms (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Jpn J Ecol 32:69–78 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  15. Sato Y, Saito Y, Mori K (2000) Patterns of reproductive isolation between two groups of Schizotetranychus miscanthi Saito (Tetranychidae: Acari) showing different male aggression traits. Appl Ent Zool 35:611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sato Y, Saito Y, Chittenden AR (2008) The parapatric distribution and contact zone of two forms showing different male-to-male aggressiveness in a social spider mite, Stigmaeopsis miscanthi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp Appl Acarol 44:265–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidt PS, Paaby AB (2008) Reproductive diapause and life-history clines in North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62:1204–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmidt PS, Matzkin L, Ippolito M, Eanes WF (2005) Geographic variation in diapause incidence, life-history traits, and climatic adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:1721–1732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yano J, Saito Y, Chittenden AR, Sato Y (2011) Variation in counterattack success against a phytoseiid predator between two forms of the social spider mite Stigmaeopsis miscanthi. J Ethol 29:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Applied Animal Ecology, Graduate School of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.NARO Agricultural Research Center (NARO/ARC)TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations