Advertisement

Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 441–452 | Cite as

Geographic distribution of the invasive cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus, a country-wide survey in Benin

  • E. M. De Clercq
  • S. O. Vanwambeke
  • M. Sungirai
  • S. Adehan
  • R. Lokossou
  • M. Madder
Article

Abstract

The cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus is currently invading the West African region, and little information is available on the spread of this exotic tick in this region. We set out a country-wide field survey to determine its current distribution in Benin. Ticks were collected on cattle from 106 farms selected by random sampling covering all regions of the country. Rhipicephalus annulatus was found on 70 % of all farms, R. decoloratus on 42 %, R. geigyi on 58 %, and R. microplus on 49 %. There is a clear geographic separation between the indigenous Rhipicephalus species and R. microplus. Rhipicephalus annulatus occurs mainly in the northern departments, but it was also observed in lower numbers in locations in the south. The presence of R. decoloratus is limited to the northern region, and in most locations, this tick makes up a small proportion of the collected ticks. The tick R. geigyi tends to be dominant, but occurs only in the four northern departments. The observations concerning R. microplus are entirely different, this species occurs in the southern and central region. The results of this survey confirm the invasive character and displacement properties of R. microplus, since in less than a decade it has colonized more than half of the country and has displaced indigenous ticks of the same genus in many of the sampled locations.

Keywords

Rhipicephalus microplus Babesia bovis Geographic tick distribution Country-wide tick survey Cattle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of the Direction de l’Elevage (DE) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MAEP) in Benin for their help during the field work. We are very grateful to all people that assisted us during the tick collection, especially the cattle owners and herdsmen. This work was funded by the Belgian Science Policy Programs (Belspo, SR/00/144).

References

  1. Aanensen DM, Huntley DM, Feil EJ, Al-Own F, Spratt BG (2009) EpiCollect: linking smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLoS ONE 4:e6968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corson MS, Teel PD, Grant WE (2004) Microclimate influence in a physiological model of cattle-fever tick (Boophilus spp.) population dynamics. Ecol Model 180:487–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Castro JJ (1997) Sustainable tick and tickborne disease control in livestock improvement in developing countries. Vet Parasitol 71:77–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ESA (2012) VECMAP—Mosquito habitat mapping service. http://iap.esa.int/projects/health/vecmap
  5. Estrada-Peña A, Venzal JM (2006) High-resolution predictive mapping for Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Mexico and Southern Texas. Vet Parasitol 142:350–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans DE, Martins JR, Guglielmone AA (2000) A review of the ticks (Acari, Ixodida) of Brazil, their hosts and geographic distribution—1. The state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswalso Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, vol 95, pp 453–470Google Scholar
  7. Farougou S, Kpodekon M, Tchabode DM, Youssao AKI, Boko C (2006) Seasonal abundance of cattle tick (Acari: Ixodidae) parasites in the Sudanese part of Benin: case of the Atacora and Donga departments. Ann Med Vet 150:145–152Google Scholar
  8. Farougou S, Kpodekon M, Adakal H, Sagbo R, Boko C (2007a) Seasonal abundance of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting sheep in the southern area of Benin. Revue Med Vet 158:627–632Google Scholar
  9. Farougou S, Tassou AW, Tchabode DM, Kpodekon M, Boko C, Youssao AKI (2007b) Tiques et hémoparasites du bétail dans le nord-Bénin. Revue Med Vet 158:463–467Google Scholar
  10. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) WORLDCLIM: very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ICTTD (2007) Surveys to establish the local, provincial or national distribution of ticks. Integrated Consortium on Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. http://biobel.biodiversity.be/project/show/3010. Newsletter on ticks and tick-borne diseases of livestock in the tropics, nr. 32, pp 6–8
  12. Lempereur L, Geysen D, Madder M (2010) Development and validation of a PCR–RFLP test to identify African Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) ticks. Acta Trop 114:55–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Madder M (2012a) I-Spot key for the identification of R. Boophilus females. http://www.ispot.org.uk/webkeys/keyintroduction.jsp?selectedKey=webkeys/Rhipicephalus%28Boophilus%29_females.0.1
  14. Madder M (2012b) I-Spot keys for the identification of R. Boophilus males. http://www.ispot.org.uk/webkeys/keyintroduction.jsp?selectedKey=webkeys/Rhipicephalus%28Boophilus%29_males.0.2.
  15. Madder M, Thys E, Geysen D, Baudoux C, Horak I (2007) Boophilus microplus ticks found in West Africa. Exp Appl Acarol 43:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Madder M, Thys E, Achi L, Touré A, De Deken R (2011) Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: a most successful invasive tick species in West-Africa. Exp Appl Acarol 53:139–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Madder M, Adehan S, De Deken R, Adehan R, Lokossou R (2012a) New foci of Rhipicephalus microplus in West Africa. Exp Appl Acarol 56:385–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madder M, Walker JG, Van Rooyen J, Knobel D, De Clercq EM, Vanwambeke SO, Berkvens D (2012b) e-Surveillance in animal health: use and evaluation of mobile tools. Parasitology/FirstView Articles. Available on CJO. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000571 Google Scholar
  19. Pegram RG, David Wilson D, Hansen JW (2000) Past and present national tick control programs: why they succeed or fail. Ann NY Acad Sci, pp 546–554Google Scholar
  20. Pérez De Leán AA, Strickman DA, Knowles DP, Fish D, Thacker E, De La Fuente J, Krause PJ, Wikel SK, Miller RS, Wagner GG et al (2010) One health approach to identify research needs in bovine and human babesioses: workshop report. Parasit Vectors 3:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peter TF, Perry BD, O’Callaghan CJ, Medley GF, Shumba W, Madzima W, Burridge MJ, Mahan SM (1998) Distributions of the vectors of heartwater, Amblyomma hebraeum and Amblyomma variegatum (Acari: Ixodidae), in Zimbabwe. Exp Appl Acarol 22:725–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vercruysse J, Lafia S, Camicas JL (1982) Les tiques (Amblyommidae) parasites des bovins en République populaire du Benin. Rev Elev Méd Vét Pays Trop 35:361–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Walker A, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG, Latif AA, Pegram RG, Preston PM (2003) Ticks of domestic animals in Africa: A guide to identification of species. The University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  24. Wint W, Robinson TP (2007) Gridded livestock of the world. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. M. De Clercq
    • 1
  • S. O. Vanwambeke
    • 1
  • M. Sungirai
    • 2
  • S. Adehan
    • 3
  • R. Lokossou
    • 4
  • M. Madder
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Georges Lemaître Institute for Earth and Climate ResearchUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.Vector Biology UnitInstitute of Tropical MedicineAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Ministère de l’Agriculture de l’Elevage et de la Pêche/CeRPA-OP/Service Recherche DéveloppementCotonouBenin
  4. 4.La Direction de l’Elevage du Ministère de l’AgricultureCotonouBenin
  5. 5.Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary ScienceUniversity of PretoriaOnderstepoortSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations