Do plant mites commonly prefer the underside of leaves?
- 389 Downloads
The adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) surfaces of a plant leaf provide heterogeneous habitats for small arthropods with different environmental conditions, such as light, humidity, and surface morphology. As for plant mites, some agricultural pest species and their natural enemies have been observed to favor the abaxial leaf surface, which is considered an adaptation to avoid rain or solar ultraviolet radiation. However, whether such a preference for the leaf underside is a common behavioral trait in mites on wild vegetation remains unknown. The authors conducted a 2-year survey on the foliar mite assemblage found on Viburnum erosum var. punctatum, a deciduous shrub on which several mite taxa occur throughout the seasons, and 14 sympatric tree or shrub species in secondary broadleaf-forest sites in Kyoto, west–central Japan. We compared adaxial–abaxial surface distributions of mites among mite taxa, seasons, and morphology of host leaves (presence/absence of hairs and domatia). On V. erosum var. punctatum, seven of 11 distinguished mite taxa were significantly distributed in favor of abaxial leaf surfaces and the trend was seasonally stable, except for Eriophyoidea. Mite assemblages on 15 plant species were significantly biased towards the abaxial leaf surfaces, regardless of surface morphology. Our data suggest that many mite taxa commonly prefer to stay on abaxial leaf surfaces in wild vegetation. Oribatida displayed a relatively neutral distribution, and in Tenuipalpidae, the ratio of eggs collected from the adaxial versus the abaxial side was significantly higher than the ratio of the motile individuals, implying that some mite taxa exploit adaxial leaf surfaces as habitat.
KeywordsHabitat heterogeneity Adaxial–abaxial distribution Domatia Trichome Behavioral adaptation
We thank Dr. K. Okabe, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, and Prof. H. Amano, Kyoto University, for identification of mites. We are also grateful to Dr. T. Itioka, Kyoto University, and Dr. S. Nishida, Nagoya University Museum, for their methodological guidance; and Dr. S. Yano, Kyoto University, for his valuable suggestions. This study was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. 22380036 to OM from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
- Ehara S (ed) (1980) Illustrations of the mites and ticks of Japan. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Ehara S (ed) (1993) Plant mites of Japan in colors. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Ehara S, Gotoh T (eds) (2009) Colored guide to the plant mites of Japan. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Jeppson LR (1975) Chapter 2. Population ecology. In: Jeppson LR, Keifer HH, Baker EW (eds) Mites injurious to economic plants. University of Carifornia Press, Berkeley, Carifornia, pp 17–46Google Scholar
- Nishida S (2004) Morphology and function of domatia. Bunrui 4(2):137–150 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Okabe K (2006) Astigmatid mites damaging agricultural crops (1). Plant Protection 60(6):233–236 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Price CE (1980) A review of the factors influencing the penetration of pesticides through plant leaves. In: Cutler DF, Alvin KL, Price CE (eds) Plant cuticle, papers presented at an international symposium organized by the Linnean Society of London, held at Burlington House, London, 8–11 September 1980. Academic Press, London, pp 237–252Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.10.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Sudo M, Nishida S, Itioka T (2010) Seasonal fluctuations in foliar mite populations on Viburnum erosum Thunb. var. punctatum Franch. et Sav. (Adoxaceae) and sympatric shrubs in temperate secondary forests in western Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 45(3):405–415. doi: 10.1303/aez.2010.405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Walter DE, Proctor HC (1999) Mites: ecology, evolution, and behaviour. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, OxonGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe H (1997) Estimation of arboreal and terrestrial arthropod densities in the forest canopy as measured by insecticide smoking. In: Stork NE, Adis J, Didham RK (eds) Canopy arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 401–414Google Scholar