Advertisement

Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 411–420 | Cite as

Morphometric analysis of oppiid mites (Acari, Oribatida) collected from Turkey

  • Şule Baran
  • Ayhan Altun
  • Nusret Ayyildiz
  • Aykut KenceEmail author
Article

Abstract

In order to assess the relationship between the oppiid mite species (Acari, Oribatida) collected from Turkey, traditional and geometric morphometric methods were used. We have taken photographs of 128 specimens belonging to 11 species from six subfamilies of Oppiidae. These photographs were digitized and 17 interval measurements were taken for traditional morphometric analysis, and 20 landmarks were recognized on the ventral surface of each specimen for geometric morphometric analysis. The effectiveness to separate taxa was compared between the two morphometric analyses. In both dendrograms Oppia nitens formed a single cluster, Oxyoppia ilicaensis was singled out from the remaining nine species, which were clustered together. Two species, Lauroppia fallax and Rhinoppia obsoleta, clustered together implying a very close relationship.

Keywords

Traditional Geometric Morphometrics Shape variation Oppiidae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Project no 105T552 (TBAG-HD/115).

References

  1. Adams DC, Funk D (1997) Morphometric inferences on sibling species and sexual dimorphism in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles: multivariate applications of the thin-plate spline. Syst Biol 46:180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004) Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool 71(1):5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayyildiz N (1989) Mites of the family Oppiidae (Acari: Oribatida) from Turkey. J Nat Hist 23:1373–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balogh J (1983) A partial revision of the Oppiidae Grandjean, 1954 (Acari: Oribatei). Acta Zool Hung 29:1–79Google Scholar
  5. Baran Ş, Ayyıldız N (2007) Two new species of soil mites (Acari, Oribatida, Oppiidae and Machuellidae) from Turkey. Zootaxa 1445:57–64Google Scholar
  6. Becerra JN, Valdecasas AG (2004) Landmark superimposition for taxonomic identification. Biol J Linn Soc 81:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behan-Pelletier VM, Eamer B (2004) Diversity of oribatida in Canada. Available via http://www.cbif.gc.ca/spp_pages/mites/phps/index_e.php. Accesed 01 Jan 2009
  8. Csiszár J, Jeleva M (1962) Oribatid mites (Acari) from Bulgarian soils. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 8(3–4):273–301Google Scholar
  9. Houck MA, OConnor BM (1998) Morphological variation in Hemisarcoptes (Acari: Hemisarcoptidae): application of multivariate morphometric analyses. Ann Ent Soc Am 91(3):335–349Google Scholar
  10. Hutcheson HJ, Oliver JH (1999) Morphometrics of North American tick vectors of Borrelia burgdorferi. Acarology IX: 2:371–378 SymposiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Kendall DG (1977) The diffusion of shape. Adv Appl Probab 9:428–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klimov PB, OConnor BM (2004) Multivariate discrimination among cryptic species of the mite genus Chaetodactylus (Acari: Chaetodactylidae) associated with bees of the genus Lithurgus (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in North America. Exp Appl Acarol 33(3):157–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klimov PB, Lekveishvili M, Dowling APG, OConnor BM (2004) Multivariate analysis of morphological variation in two cryptic species of Sancassania (Acari: Acaridae) from Costa Rica. Ann Ent Soc Am 97(2):322–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch CL (1835) Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden. Ein Beitrag zur deutschen Fauna vol 3 RegensburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Monteiro LR, Abe AS (1999) Functional and historical determinants of shape in the scapula of xenarthran mammals: the evolution of a complex morphological structure. J Morphol 241:251–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monteiro-Filho ELA, Monteiro LR, Reis SF (2002) Skull shape and size divergence in dolphins of the genus Sotalia: a tridimensional morphometric analysis. J Mammal 83:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mutanen M, Pretorius E (2007) Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: a comparison of moth genitalia. Syst Entomol 32(2):371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oudemans AC (1900) New list of Dutch Acari. 1st part. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 43:150–171Google Scholar
  19. Oudemans AC (1902) Acarologische Aanteekeningen. Entomologische Berichten 1:36–39Google Scholar
  20. Paoli G (1908) Monografia del Genere Dameosoma Berl. e generi afini. Redia 5:31–91Google Scholar
  21. Rohlf FJ (1993) Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Marcus LF, Bello E, García-Valdecasas A (eds) Contribution to Morpometrics, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, vol 8. CSIC, Madrid, pp 131–159Google Scholar
  22. Rohlf FJ (2008) Morphometrics at suny stony brook available via DIALOG http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
  23. Slice DE (1998) Morpheus et al.: software for morphometric research. Revision 01-30-98-Beta. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Subías LS (2010) Listado sistematico, sinonimico y biogeografico de los acaros oribatidos (Acariformes: Oribatida) del Mundo (Excepto fosiles). http://www.ucm.es/info/zoo/Artropodos/Catalogo.pdf
  25. Subias LS, Arillo A (2001) Acari, Oribatei, Gymnonota II. En:Fauna Iberica. In: Ramos MA et al (eds) Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, vol 15. CSIC, MadridGoogle Scholar
  26. Subías LS, Balogh P (1989) Identification keys to the genera of Oppiidae Grandjean, 1954 (Acari: Oribatei). Acta Zool Hung 35:355–412Google Scholar
  27. Tixier MS, Kreiter S, Cheval B, Auger P (2003) Morphometric variation between populations of Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) (Acari:Phytoseiidae): implications for the taxonomy of the genus. Invertebr Syst 17:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weigmann G (2006) Hornmilben (Oribatida). In: Dahl, Tierwelt Deutschlands 76. Goecke & Evers, KelternGoogle Scholar
  29. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Şule Baran
    • 1
  • Ayhan Altun
    • 2
  • Nusret Ayyildiz
    • 3
  • Aykut Kence
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and ScienceSakarya UniversitySakaryaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and ScienceMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and ScienceErciyes UniversityKayseriTurkey

Personalised recommendations