Experimental and Applied Acarology

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 173–183

Morphological variation in different populations of Aceria anthocoptes (Acari: Eriophyoidea) associated with the Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense, in Serbia

  • Biljana D. Magud
  • Ljubiša Ž. Stanisavljević
  • Radmila U. Petanović
Short Communication

Abstract

The russet mite, Aceria anthocoptes (Nal.), is the only eriophyid that has been recorded on Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. It has been noted in several European countries and recently in the USA. With its apparent host specificity and because of the damage it causes to its host plant, A. anthocoptes is being studied as a potential candidate for classical biological control. The aim of the present study was to examine quantitative morphological traits in four populations of A. anthocoptes living on two infraspecific host plant taxa (C. arvense var. arvense and C. arvense var. vestitum) in two geographically separate areas of Serbia in order to test the hypothesis of absence of the possible host plant impact on mite morphology. MANOVA analysis revealed significant differences between populations from different localities in Serbia. Populations of A. anthocoptes inhabiting two thistle varieties in the vicinity of Belgrade differed significantly from mites inhabiting the same two host varieties in the vicinity of the town of Ivanjica. Canonical discriminant analysis showed that the trait which best discriminates the populations of A. anthocoptes is the number of dorsal annuli. It was not possible to ascribe morphological differences to the impact of the host plant.

Keywords

Aceria anthocoptes Eriophyoid mites Creeping thistle mite Host plant impact Morphometry Serbia 

References

  1. Amrine JW, Manson DCM (1996) Preparation, mounting and descriptive study of eriophyoid mites. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites. their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 383–396Google Scholar
  2. Amrine JW Jr, Stasny TAH, Flechtmann CHW (2003) Revised keys to world genera of Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, MIGoogle Scholar
  3. Boczek J, Zawadzki W, Davis R (1984) Studies on the morphological and biological differences in Aculus fockeui (Nalepa et Trouessart) (Acari: Eriophyidae) on various host plants. Internat J Acarol 10:81–87Google Scholar
  4. Davis R, Flechtmann CHW, Boczek JH, Barke HF (1982) Catalogue of eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea). Warshaw Agricultural University Press, WarshawGoogle Scholar
  5. De Lillo E (2001) A modified method for eriophyoid mite extraction (Acari: Eriophyoidea). Internat J Acarol 27(1):67–70Google Scholar
  6. Hegi G (1954) Illustriete flora von Mitteln-Europa, BandVI 2 Teil. Carl hanser Varlag-Munchen. C. arvense, pp 903–916Google Scholar
  7. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho LV, Herberger JP (1977) Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. The worlds worst weeds. Distribution and biology. University Press of Hawaii for the East-West food Institute, Honolulu, pp 217–224Google Scholar
  8. Gajić M (1975) Asteraceae Dum. In: Josifović M (ed) Flora of the Republic of Serbia VII, p 465Google Scholar
  9. Gassmann A, Petanović R, Rančić D, Magud B, Toševski I (2004) Biological control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Annual report 2003. Unpublished report, CABI Bioscience Switwerland Centre, DelemontGoogle Scholar
  10. Kozlowski J (1998) Czynniki warunkujace odmain jabloni i rekcja odmain na pordzewiacza jabloniwego-Aculus schlechtendali (Nalepa) (Factors determining susceptibility and response of apple cultivars to the apple rust mite: Aculus schlechtendali (Nalepa). Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roslin w Poznaniu 2, p 119Google Scholar
  11. Lamb KP (1953) A revision of the gall-mites (Acarina, Eriophyidea) occurring on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.), with a key to Eriophyidae recorded from solanaceous plants. Bull Ent Res 44(2):343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindquist EE, Oldfield GN (1996) Evolution of eriophyoid mites in relation to their host plants. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 277–300Google Scholar
  13. Manly FJB (1986) Multivariate statistical methods—A primer. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Ochoa R, Erbe EF, Wergin WP, Frye C, Lydon J (2001) The presence of Aceria anthocoptes (Nalepa) (Acari: Eriophyidae) on Cirsium species in the United States. Internat J Acarol 27:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oldfield GN (1996) Diversity and host plant specificity. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, pp 195–216Google Scholar
  16. Oldfield GN (1999) Distribution of asymmetrical and symmetrical sperm storage in the Eriophyoidea and its phylogenetic implications. In: Bruin J, van der Geest LPS, Sabelis MW (eds) Ecology and evolution of Acari. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nederlands, pp 157–161Google Scholar
  17. Petanović R, Dimitrijević J (1995) Intraspecific variability of Vasates euphorbiae Pet. (Acari: Eriophyiodea) on different subspecies of the host plant. Zaštita bilja 46(1), 211:17–28Google Scholar
  18. Petanović R, Boczek J, Stojnić B (1997) Taxonomy and bioecology (Acari: Eriophyoidea) associated with Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Acarologia 38:181–191Google Scholar
  19. Rančić D (2003) Morpho-anatomical alterations of vegetative and reproductive organs of plant species Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. caused by eriophyid mite Aceria anthocoptes (Nal.). MSc thesis, University of BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  20. Rančić D, Stevanović B, Petanović R, Magud B, Toševski I, Gassmann A (2006) Anatomical injury induced by the eriohyid mite Aceria anthocoptes on the leaves of Cirsium arvense. Exp Appl Acarol 38:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shevtchenko VG, De Millo AP, Razvyazkina GM, Kapkova EA (1970) Taksonomicheskoe razgranichenie blizkih vidov klschej Aceria tulipae Keif. i Aceria tritici sp.n. (Acarina: Eriophyioidae) perenoschikov virusov luka i pshenici. (Taxonomic separation of similar species of eriophyid mites, Aceria tulipae Keif. and A. tritici sp.n. (Acarina, Eriophyoidea)—vectors of the viruses of onions and wheat) Zoologicheskiy zhurnal 49(2):224–235Google Scholar
  22. Skinner K, Smith L, Rice P (2000) Using noxious weed lists to prioritize targets for developing weed managements strategies. Weed Sci 48:640–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skoracka A (2004) Eriophyoid mites from grasses in Poland (Acari: Eriophyoidea), Genus—supplement 13, BS, Wroclaw, p 205Google Scholar
  24. Skoracka A, Kuczynski L (2006) Is the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix really a generalist?—Testing colonization performance on novel hosts. Exp Appl Acarol 38:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skoracka A, Kucynski L, Magowski W (2002) Morphological variation in different host populations of Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea). Exp Appl Acarol 26:187–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. StatSoft Inc (2001) Statistica (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.comGoogle Scholar
  27. Sukhareva SI (1992) Chetirekhnogie kleshchi na zlakah.(Four-legged mites on grasses). S. Peterburgskii Gosudarstveni Universitet, Sant Petersburg, p 230Google Scholar
  28. Sukhareva SI (2001) Four-legged mites (Acari: Tetrapodili) of the genus Aceria from plants of the family Asteraceae with the description of a new species. Acarina 9(1):131–141Google Scholar
  29. Tabachnik B, Fidell L (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Zand EH, Beckie J, Myhre CD, Loeppky HA (2002) Response of two Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) varietets to herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 82(3):625–628Google Scholar
  31. Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biljana D. Magud
    • 1
  • Ljubiša Ž. Stanisavljević
    • 2
  • Radmila U. Petanović
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BelgradeBelgrade-ZemunSerbia
  2. 2.Institute of Zoology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations