Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 41–50 | Cite as

Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae to the tobacco spider mite Tetranychus evansi

  • Vitalis W. Wekesa
  • Nguya K. Maniania
  • Markus Knapp
  • Hamadi I. Boga
Article

Abstract

Seventeen isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin and two isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin were evaluated for their pathogenicity against the tobacco spider mite, Tetranychus evansi Baker & Pritchard. In the laboratory all the fungal isolates were pathogenic to the adult female mites, causing mortality between 22.1 and 82.6%. Isolates causing more than 70% mortality were subjected to dose–response mortality bioassays. The lethal concentration causing 50% mortality (LC50) values ranged between 0.7×107 and 2.5×107 conidia ml−1. The lethal time to 50% mortality (LT50) values of the most active isolates of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae strains varied between 4.6 and 5.8 days. Potted tomato plants were artificially infested with T. evansi and treated with B. bassiana isolate GPK and M. anisopliae isolate ICIPE78. Both fungal isolates reduced the population density of mites as compared to untreated controls. However, conidia formulated in oil outperformed the ones formulated in water. This study demonstrates the prospects of pathogenic fungi for the management of T. evansi.

Keywords

Beauveria bassiana Biological control Fungi Metarhizium anisopliae Pathogenicity Tetranychus evansi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott, W.S. 1925A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticideJ. Econ. Entomol.18265267Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves, S.B., Rossi, L.S., Lopes, R.B., Tamai, M.A., Pereira, R.M. 2002Beauveria bassiana yeast on agar medium and its pathogenicity against Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)J. Invertebr. Pathol.817077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batta, Y.A. 2003Production and testing of novel formulations of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinkoff) Sorokin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes)Crop Protect.22415422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgerjon, A. 1956Pulvérisation et poudrage au laboratoire par des préparations pathogènes insecticidesAnn. Epiphyt.7675684Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandler, D., Davidson, G., Pell, J.K., Ball, B.V., Haw, K., Sunderland, K.D. 2000Fungal biocontrol of AcariBiocontrol Sci. Technol.10357384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costa, S.D., Gaugler, R.R. 1989Sensitivity of Beauveria bassiana to solanine and tomatine: plant defensive chemicals inhibit an insect pathogenJ. Chem. Ecol.15697707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cowles, R.S., Cowles, E.A., McDermott, A.M., Ramoutar, D. 2000‘Inertȁ9 formulation ingredients with activity: toxicity of trisiloxane surfactant solutions to two spotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae)J. Econ. Entomol.93180188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekesi, S., Maniania, N.K., Onu, I., Löhr, B. 1998Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi (Hyphomycetes) to the legume flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)J. Appl. Entomol.122629634Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng, M.G., Johnson, J.B. 1990Relative susceptibility of six strains of Beauveria bassiana on Diuraphis noxia Mordwilko (Homoptera: Aphididae)Environ. Entomol.19785790Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferron, P., Hurpin, B., Robert, P.H. 1972Sur la spécifité de Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.)Sor. Entomophaga17165178Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humber, R.A., de Moraes, G.J., dos Santos, J.M. 1981Natural infection of Tetranychus evansi (Acarina: Tetranychidae) by a Triplosporium sp. (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) in Northeastern BrazilEntomophaga26421425Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaaya, G.P., Hassan, S. 2000Entomogenous fungi as promising biopesticides for tick controlExp. Appl. Acarol.24913926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knapp, M., Wagener, B., Navajas, M. 2003Molecular discrimination between the spider mite Tetranychus evansi Baker & Pritchardan important pest of tomatoes in southern Africaand the closely related species T. urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae)Afr. Entomol.11300304Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maniania, N.K., Fargues, J. 1984Spécificité des hyphomycètes entomopathogènes pour les larves de lépidoptères NoctuidaeEntomophaga12451464Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mwangi, E.N., Kaaya, G.P., Essuman, S. 1995Experimental infections of the tick Ripicephalus appendiculatus with pathogenic fungiBeauveria bassianaMetarhizium anisopliaeand natural infections of some ticks with bacteria and fungiJ. Afr. Zool.109151160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pena, J.E., Osborne, L.S., Duncan, R.E. 1996Potential of fungi as biocontrol agents of Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae)Entomophaga412736Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poprawski, T.J., Marchal, M., Robert, P.H. 1985Comparative susceptibility of Otiorhynchus sulcatus and Sitona lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) early stages to five entomopathogenic hyphomycetesEnviron. Entomol.14247253Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prior, C., Jollands, P., le Patourel, G. 1988Infectivity of oil and water formulations of Beauveria bassiana Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) to the cocoa weevil pest Pantorhytes plutus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)J. Invertebr. Pathol.526672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qureshi, A.H., Oatman, E.R., Fleschner, C.A. 1969Biology of the spider miteTetranychus evansiAnn. Entomol. Soc. Am.62898903Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramalho, F.S., Flechtmann, C.H.W. 1979Niveis de infestacao de Tetranychus (T.) evansi em diferentes fases de desenvolvimento do tomateiroRev. Agricult.545156Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    SAS Institute1990SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Vol. 2SAS InstituteCary, NCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saunyama, I.G.M., Knapp, M. 2003The effects of pruning and trellising of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) on red spider mite (Tetranychus evansi Baker and Pritchard) incidence and crop yield in ZimbabweAfr. Crop Sci. J.11269277Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaw, K.E., Davidson, G., Clark, S.J., Ball, B.V., Pell, J.K., Chandler, D., Sunderland, K.D. 2002Laboratory bioassays to assess the pathogenicity of mitosporic fungi to Varroa destructor (Acari: Mesostigmata), an ectoparasite mite of the honeybeeApis melliferaBiol. Control24266276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soper, R.S., Ward, M.G. 1981

    Production, formulation and application of fungi for insect control

    Papavizas, G.C. eds. Biological Crop ProductionAllanheldOsmumMontclairNew Jersey161180
    Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tipping, C., Bikoba, V., Chandler, G.J., Mitcham, E.J. 2003Efficacy of Silwet L-77 against several arthropod pests of table grapeJ. Econ. Entomol.96246250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Veen, K.H. 1968Recherche sur les maladies due à Metarhizium anisopliae chez le criquet pèlerinMededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, Nederland681117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vitalis W. Wekesa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nguya K. Maniania
    • 2
  • Markus Knapp
    • 2
  • Hamadi I. Boga
    • 1
  1. 1.Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT)NairobiKenya
  2. 2.International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE)GPO NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations