Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Development and reproduction of Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae) with fungus gnat larvae (Diptera: Sciaridae), potworms (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) or Sancassania aff. sphaerogaster (Acari: Acaridae) as the sole food source

  • Ana R. Cabrera
  • Raymond A. Cloyd
  • Edmond R. ZaborskiEmail author


Stratiolaelaps ( = Hypoaspis) miles (Berlese) (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) is a polyphagous soil-dwelling predatory mite that is widely marketed for use in greenhouse production systems to manage populations of dark-winged fungus gnats, Bradysia spp. (Diptera: Sciaridae) and for supplemental control of thrips. The suggestion by Walter and Campbell (2003, Biol. Control 26: 253–269) that North American commercial cultures of S. miles may actually be S. scimitus was confirmed. The development and reproduction at 21–23 °C of S. scimitus provided ad libidum with one of three different prey – the fungus gnat Bradysia aff. coprophila (Lintner), potworms (Enchytraeidae), or Sancassania aff. sphaerogaster (Zachvatkin, 1937) (Acari: Astigmata: Acaridae) – were compared. Developmental duration of the egg and non-feeding larval stages were 2.47 and 1.11 days, respectively; mortalities were 8.3 and 5.5%. Stratiolaelaps scimitus failed to develop beyond the protonymphal stage when provided with S. aff. sphaerogaster alone, although some feeding was observed. Development and reproduction of S. scimitus was successful on both fungus gnat larvae and enchytraeids, with no influence of prey on protonymphal duration (4.70 days) and mortality (8.3%), or on deutonymphal duration (4.61 days) and mortality (6.1%). Adult female S. scimitus feeding on potworms, compared to those feeding on fungus gnat larvae, had a significantly shorter pre-oviposition period (2.69 vs. 4.59 days). However, diet did not influence other adult female developmental or reproductive characteristics (oviposition period, 18.6 days; post-oviposition period, 6.2 days; total adult longevity, 27.3 days; total number of eggs, 26.5). S. scimitus reared on potworms tended (p = 0.06) to have a higher intrinsic rate of increase, a higher finite rate of increase and a shorter doubling time (rm = 0.142 day−1, λ = 1.153, Dt = 4.85 days) than those reared on fungus gnat larvae (rm = 0.105 day−1, λ = 1.110, Dt = 6.58 days), but differences in net reproductive rate (R0) and generation time (G) were not significant.


Bradysia sp. nr. coprophila Development Enchytraeidae Hypoaspis miles Reproduction Sancassania aff. sphaerogaster Stratiolaelaps scimitus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali, O., Brennan, P. 1997Developmentfeeding and reproduction of the predatory miteHypoaspis miles (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) on different types of preySyst. Appl. Acarol.28188Google Scholar
  2. Ali, O., Dunne, R., Brennan, P. 1997Biological control of the sciarid fly, Lycoriella solani by the predatory miteHypoaspis miles (Acari: Laelapidae) in mushroom cropsSyst. Appl. Acarol.27180Google Scholar
  3. Ali, O., Dunne, R., Brennan, P. 1999Effectiveness of the predatory mite Hypoaspis miles (Acari: Mesostigmata: Hypoaspidae) in conjunction with pesticides for control of the mushroom fly Lycoriella solani (Diptera: Sciaridae)Exp. Appl. Acarol.236577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndt, O., Meyhöfer, R., Poehling, H.-M. 2003Propensity towards cannibalism among Hypoaspis aculeiferH. milestwo soil-dwelling predatory mite speciesExp. Appl. Acarol.31114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brødsgaard, H.F., Sardar, M.A., Enkegaard, A. 1996Prey preference of Hypoaspis miles (Berlese) (Acarina: Hypoaspididae): Non-interference with other beneficials in glasshouse cropsIOBC/WPRS Bull.192326Google Scholar
  6. A.R.Cabrera 2003 Evaluation of the effects of greenhouse pesticides on the soil-dwelling predatory mite Hypoaspis miles(Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers, R.J., Wright, E.M., Lind, R.J. 1993Biological control of glasshouse sciarid flies (Bradysia spp.) with the predatory miteHypoaspis mileson cyclamen and poinsettiaBiocontrol Sci. Technol.3285293Google Scholar
  8. Crowley, P.H. 1992Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolutionAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.23405447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dash, M.C. 1990Oligochaeta: EnchytraeidaeDindal, D.L. eds. Soil Biology GuideJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc.New York, NY, USA311340Google Scholar
  10. Didden, W.A.M., Frund, H.C., Graefe, U. 1997EnchytraeidsBenckiser, G. eds. Fauna in Soil EcosystemsMarcel DekkerINC.New York, NY, USA135172Google Scholar
  11. Enkegaard, A., Sardar, M.A., Brødsgaard, H.F. 1997The predatory mite Hypoaspis miles: biological and demographic characteristics on two prey species, the mushroom sciarid fly, Lycoriella solanithe mould miteTyrophagus putrescentiaeEntomol. Exp. Appl.82135146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillespie, D.R., Quiring, D.M.J. 1990Biological control of fungus gnats, Bradysia spp. (Diptera: Sciaridae), and Western Flower Thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in greenhouses using a soil-dwelling predatory miteGeolaelaps sp. nr. aculeifer (Canestrini) (Acari: Laelapidae)Can. Entomol.122975983Google Scholar
  13. Hoda, F.M., Taha, H.A., Ibrahim, G.A., EI-Beheri, M.M. 1986Biological observations on the predatory miteHypoaspis miles Berlese (Acarina: Laelapidae)Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypte66103106Google Scholar
  14. Jess, S., Kilpatrick, M. 2000An integrated approach to the control of Lycoriella solani (Diptera: Sciaridae) during production of the cultivated mushroom (Agaricus bisporus)Pest Manage. Sci.56477485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesna, I., Sabelis, M.W. Bolland H.R., Conijn, C.G.M. 1995Candidate natural enemies for control of Rhizoglyphus robini Claparède (Acari: Astigmata) in lily bulbs: exploration in the field and pre-selection in the laboratoryExp. Appl. Acarol.19655669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maia, A.H.N., Luiz, A.J.B., Campanhola, C. 2000Statistical inference on associated fertility life table parameters using jackknife technique: computational aspectsJ. Econ. Entomol.93511518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasmy, A.H., Nasr, A.K., Reda, A.S. 1987Reproductive response and development of three soil predaceous mites utilizing the acarid mite Tyrophagus casei Oud. as an alternate dietAnz. Schadlingskde., Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz609294Google Scholar
  18. Rat-Morris, E. 1999Biological control of Thrips tabaci on protected leek seed cropsIOBC/WPRS Bull.22201204Google Scholar
  19. Rhode, J.C. 1956A modification of the plaster–charcoal technique for the rearing of mites and other small arthropodsEcology37843844Google Scholar
  20. SAS Institute Inc.1999SAS/STAT® Users Guidev.8SAS InstituteInc.Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  21. Schereef, G.M., Soliman, Z.R., Afifi, A.M. 1980Economic importance of the mite Hypoaspis miles Berlese (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) and its life historyZool. Soc. EgyptBull.30103108Google Scholar
  22. Steiner, M., Goodwin, S., Wellham, T. 1999A simplified rearing method for Stratiolaelaps (=Hypoaspis) miles (Acari: Laelapidae)IOBC/WPRS Bull.22241242Google Scholar
  23. Walter, D.E., Campbell, N.J.H. 2003Exotic vs endemic biocontrol agents: would the real Stratiolaelaps miles (Berlese) (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae), please stand up?Biol. Control26253269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wawrzynski, R.P., Ascerno, M.E., McDonough, M.J. 2001A survey of biological control users in Midwest greenhouse operationsAm. Entomol.47228234Google Scholar
  25. Wright, E.M., Chambers, R.J. 1994The biology of the predatory mite Hypoaspis miles (Acari: Laelapidae), a potential biological control agent of Bradysia paupera (Diptera: Sciaridae)Entomophaga39225235Google Scholar
  26. Ydergaard, S., Enkegaard, A., Brødsgaard, H.F. 1997The predatory mite Hypoaspis miles: temperature dependent life table characteristics on a diet of sciarid larvaeBradysia pauperaB. triticiEntomoI. Exp. Appl.85177187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana R. Cabrera
    • 1
  • Raymond A. Cloyd
    • 1
  • Edmond R. Zaborski
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisChampaign-UrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Ecological EntomologyIllinois Natural History SurveyChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations