In this paper, we propose a mathematical model for flow and transport processes of diluted solutions in domains separated by a leaky semipermeable membrane. We formulate transmission conditions for the flow and the solute concentration across the membrane which take into account the property of the membrane to partly reject the solute, the accumulation of rejected solute at the membrane, and the influence of the solute concentration on the volume flow, known as osmotic effect.
The model is solved numerically for the situation of a domain in two dimensions, consisting of two subdomains separated by a rigid fixed membrane.
The numerical results for different values of the material parameters and different computational settings are compared.
leaky semipermeable membrane osmotic pressure transmission conditions finite element method
74K15 82C70 34C60 76D05
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
T. Cheng: Flux analysis by modified osmotic-pressure model for laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Separation and Purification Technology 13 (1998), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. J. Coleman, D. Scott, R.M. Mason, J.R. Levick: Characterization of the effect of high molecular weight hyaluronan on trans-synovial flow in rabbit kness. The Journal of Physiology 514 (1999), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Hron, C. Leroux, J. Malek, K. Rajagopal: Flows of incompressible fluids subject to Naviers slip on the boundary. Comput. Math. Appl. 56 (2008), 2128–2143.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
O. Kedem, A. Katchalsky: Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 27 (1958), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N. Kocherginsky: Mass transport and membrane separations: Universal description in terms of physicochemical potential and Einstein’s mobility. Chemical Engineering Science 65 (2010), 1474–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Neuss-Radu, W. Jager: Effective transmission conditions for reaction-diffusion processes in domains separated by an interface. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2007), 687–720.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
C. Patlak, D. Goldstein, J. Hoffman: The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system. J. Theoretical Biology 5 (1963), 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K. Rajagopal, A. Wineman: The diffusion of a fluid through a highly elastic spherical membrane. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 21 (1983), 1171–1183.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. Scott, P. Coleman, R. Mason, J. Levick: Concentration dependence of interstitial flow buffering by hyaluronan in sinovial joints. Microvasc. Research 59 (2000), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L. Tao, J. Humphrey, K. Rajagopal: A mixture theory for heat-induced alterations in hydration and mechanical properties in soft tissues. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 39 (2001), 1535–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar