Advertisement

How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice?

  • Jing ChenEmail author
  • Zhe Zhang
  • Ming Jia
Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to explore how CEO narcissism affects firms’ CSR choice given that the relationship between chief executive officer (CEO) narcissism and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has yielded inconclusive results. On the basis of upper echelon theory and the attention-based view, we first propose that narcissistic CEOs allocate more attention to peripheral CSR and less attention to embedded CSR. We then explore the boundary conditions that may affect CEO narcissism and CSR choice. We find that CEO narcissism is positively related to peripheral CSR and negatively related to embedded CSR via a sample of 4792 firm-year observations in the manufacturing industry of Chinese A-share listed firms. Results show that family ownership weakens the negative relation between CEO narcissism and embedded CSR. Moreover, CEO duality strengthens the positive relation between CEO narcissism and peripheral CSR and strengthens the negative relation between CEO narcissism and embedded CSR. These findings have significant implications for the CSR literature, narcissism research, and the attention-based view.

Keywords

CEO narcissism Peripheral CSR Embedded CSR Family ownership CEO duality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely acknowledge editor Maoliang Bu and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and excellent contributions to this manuscript. This study is funded by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71672139) and (Grant No.71932007) and is sponsored by Humanities and Social Science Talent Plan of Shaanxi University.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71672139) and (Grant No.71932007), and was sponsored by Humanities and Social Science Talent Plan of Shaanxi University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Jing Chen declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Zhe Zhang declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Ming Jia declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguinis, H. 2011. Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. 2013. Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(04): 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. 2017. On corporate social responsibility, Sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3): 1057–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alshammari, M. 2017. CEO narcissism. Prior Experience, Board Prior Experience, And Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):An Integrated Framework Using Upper Echelons Theory, Stakeholders’ Theory, And A Decomposed Measure Of CSR, The University of Texas Arlington, Arlington.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. L. 2008. An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 606–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1): 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. 2006. Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of corporate finance, 12(5): 855–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, R. J., Jeong, S.-H., & Graffin, S. D. 2019. Born to take risk? The effect of CEO birth order on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4): 1278–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. 2011. The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Chirico, F. 2014. Firm philanthropy in small- and medium-sized family firms. Family Business Review, 27(3): 244–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6): 1153–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2007. It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3): 351–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, Y.-S. 2008. The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3): 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. 2006. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4): 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chin, M., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2): 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. 2012. Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. 2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Vries, M. F. K., & Miller, D. 1986. Personality, culture, and organization. Academy of Management Review, 11(2): 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. 2013. Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of Socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3): 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delmas, M. A., & Gergaud, O. 2014. Sustainable certification for future generations. Family Business Review, 27(3): 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finkelstein, S., & D'aveni, R. A. 1994. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1079–1108.Google Scholar
  26. Garg, V. K., Walters, B. A., & Priem, R. L. 2003. Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8): 725–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ge, J., & Micelotta, E. 2019. When does the family matter? Institutional pressures and corporate philanthropy in China. Organization Studies, 017084061983670.Google Scholar
  28. Ge, J., & Zhao, W. 2017. Institutional linkages with the state and organizational practices in corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Management and Organization Review, 13(3): 539–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerstner, W.-C., König, A., Enders, A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2013. CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2): 257–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 653–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta, A., Nadkarni, S., & Mariam, M. 2018. Dispositional sources of managerial discretion: CEO ideology, CEO personality, and firm strategies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 000183921879312.Google Scholar
  33. Ham, C., Lang, M., Seybert, N., & Wang, S. 2017a. CFO narcissism and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5): 1089–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ham, C., Seybert, N., & Wang, S. 2017b. Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(1): 234–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hengst, I.-A., Jarzabkowski, P., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. 2019. Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of management journal(ja).Google Scholar
  38. Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. 2012. Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? The Journal of Finance, 67(4): 1457–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. 2009. Self-selection, endogeneity, and the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10): 1092–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. 2012. Critical mass of women on BODs, multiple identities, and corporate philanthropic disaster response: Evidence from privately owned Chinese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2): 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. 2006. Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. J Appl Psychol, 91(4): 762–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kammerlander, N., & Ganter, M. 2015. An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3): 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, K.-H., Kim, M., & Qian, C. 2018. Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of Management, 44(3): 1079–1118.Google Scholar
  44. Kohut, H., Wolf, E., & S. 1978. The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59: 413–425.Google Scholar
  45. Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. 2011. Embedded sustainability: The next big competitive advantage: Stanford business books.Google Scholar
  46. Lin, H., Sui, Y., Ma, H., Wang, L., & Zeng, S. 2018. CEO narcissism, public concern, and megaproject social responsibility: Moderated mediating examination. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(4): 04018018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, H., Chiang, J. T., Fehr, R., Xu, M., & Wang, S. 2017. How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment. J Appl Psychol, 102(11): 1590–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. 2017. Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1): 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mallette, P., & Fowler, K. L. 1992. Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of “poison pills”. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5): 1010–1035.Google Scholar
  50. Marquez-Illescas, G., Zebedee, A. A., & Zhou, L. 2019. Hear me write: Does CEO narcissism affect disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 925–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marquis, C., & Lee, M. 2013. Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4): 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marquis, C., & Qian, C. 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1): 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mishra, P., & Schmidt, G. B. 2013. Unfortunately, ambiguities still abound in how we conceptualize corporate social responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(04): 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. 2001. Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morf, C. C., Weir, C., & Davidov, M. 2000. Narcissism and intrinsic motivation: The role of goal congruence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(4): 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nadkarni, S., & Barr, P. S. 2008. Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13): 1395–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olsen, K. J., & Stekelberg, J. 2015. CEO narcissism and corporate tax sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 38(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orlitzky, M., & Shen, J. 2013. Corporate social responsibility, industry, and strategy. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(04): 346–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park, J.-H., Kim, C., Chang, Y. K., Lee, D.-H., & Sung, Y.-D. 2015. CEO hubris and firm performance: Exploring the moderating roles of CEO power and board vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4): 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. 2014. The harder they fall, the faster they rise: Approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10): 1528–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peng, L., & Xiong, W. 2006. Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3): 563–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. 2010. Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 262–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robert, R., & Terry, H. 1988. A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5): 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sarason, Y., & Hanley, G. 2013. Embedded corporate social responsibility: Can't we do better than GE, Intel, and IBM? How about a benefit corporation? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(04): 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tang, Y., Li, J., & Yang, H. 2012. What I see, what I do. Journal of Management, 41(6): 1698–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tang, Y., Mack, D. Z., & Chen, G. 2018. The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal. Google Scholar
  70. Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. 2015. How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9): 1338–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tobin, J. 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. 2010a. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 550–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., & Bierman, L. 2010b. Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10): 946–968.Google Scholar
  74. Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. 2002. The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5): 819–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, G., DeGhetto, K., Ellen, B. P., & Lamont, B. T. 2018. Board antecedents of CEO duality and the moderating role of country-level managerial discretion: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1): 172–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. 2016. Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility.Google Scholar
  77. Yates, M., & Hollensbe, E. 2013. On the positives of peripheral corporate social responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(04): 368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zamir, F., & Saeed, A. 2018. Location matters: Impact of geographical proximity to financial centers on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Google Scholar
  79. Zhang, H., Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., & Wang, H. 2017. CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5): 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of ManagementNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations