Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 937–970 | Cite as

The economic consequences of business sustainability initiatives

  • Chee Kwong LauEmail author
Article
  • 330 Downloads

Abstract

In 2010, Bursa Malaysia (the Malaysian Stock Exchange) introduced an initiative of business sustainability for its public listed companies (PLC) and a number of benefits were listed to encourage the voluntary adoption of this initiative. This study examines the economic benefits achieved by sample Malaysia firms which embarked on different levels of business sustainability initiatives (BSI). A disclosure index, based on a framework of BSI constructs, was used to determine the levels of BSI and quality of disclosures of the sample firms – the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Top 100 (FBM100) Index constituents. It finds that firms with a higher BSI level generally enjoy better firm market value (as proxied by Tobin Q), lower cost of equity and cost of debt. It also provides evidence that while profitable firms are more likely to embark on BSI, such initiatives are in fact more likely to reduce than increase the profitability of firms. The significant associations between the BSI level and its economic benefits reflect the decision usefulness of sustainability reporting and disclosures. Since the framework of BSI constructs reflects the strategic integration of BSI into the sample firms’ strategic management, this suggests that BSI strategic integration is a key to the economic benefits of BSI. The findings provide useful support for Bursa Malaysia, as well as for other stock exchanges around the world – especially those in developing countries – in nurturing BSI as a core element in the strategic management of PLCs and making sustainability reporting mandatory among them.

Keywords

Business sustainability Firm market value Cost of capital 

Notes

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24: 11–24.Google Scholar
  2. Allayannis, G., Lel, U., & Miller, D. P. 2012. The use of foreign currency derivatives, corporate governance and firm value around the world. Journal of International Economics, 87: 65–79.Google Scholar
  3. Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. 2011. Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a develping country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20: 141–156.Google Scholar
  4. Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. 2002. Unfolding stakeholder engagement. Sheffield:Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Aretz, K., & Bartram, S. M. 2010. Corporate hedging and shareholder value. Journal of Financial Research, 33: 317–371.Google Scholar
  6. Arya, B., & Zhang, G. 2009. Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 1089–1112.Google Scholar
  7. Ballou, B., Casey, R. J., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. 2012. Exploring the strategic intergration of sustainability initiatives: Opportunities for accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 26: 265–288.Google Scholar
  8. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197–218.Google Scholar
  9. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717–736.Google Scholar
  10. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 71–86.Google Scholar
  11. Bose, S., Khan, H.Z., Rashid, A. and Islam, S. 2018. What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35: 501-527.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. 2009. Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 571–580.Google Scholar
  13. Brundtland Commission 1987. Our common future. Brussels:The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  14. Bursa Malaysia. 2013. Sustainability. https://www.bursamalaysia.com.my, Accessed January 14, 2013.
  15. Bursa Malaysia. 2015. Sustainability. https://www.bursamalaysia.com.my, Accessed December 28, 2015.
  16. Bursa Malaysia. 2016. Sustainability. https://www.bursamalaysia.com.my, Accessed July 13, 2016.
  17. Carroll, A. B. 2000. Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10: 33–42.Google Scholar
  18. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1–23.Google Scholar
  19. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluation corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.Google Scholar
  20. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society, 33: 303–327.Google Scholar
  21. Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. 2011. Toward a theoretical toolbox for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39: 86–100.Google Scholar
  22. Cordoba-Pachon, J., Garde-Sanchez, R., & Rodriguez-Balivar, M. 2014. A systemic view of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Knowledge and Process Management, 21: 206–219.Google Scholar
  23. Cornaggia, J. 2013. Does risk management matter? Evidence from the U.S. agricultural industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 109: 419–440.Google Scholar
  24. Curran, M., & Moran, D. 2007. Impact of the FTSE4Good index on firm price: An event study. Journal of Environmental Management, 82: 529–537.Google Scholar
  25. Daub, C. 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: An alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 75–85.Google Scholar
  26. Daniel, M., & McGrath, D. 2013. ESG reporting - class actions, deterrence, and avoidance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4: 216–235.Google Scholar
  27. Deng, X., Kang, J., & Low, B. S. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110: 87–109.Google Scholar
  28. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsag, A., & Yang, Y. G. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86: 59–100.Google Scholar
  29. Dye, R. A. 1985. Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 23: 123–145.Google Scholar
  30. European Commission 2002. Corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. Brussels:Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  31. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21 stcentury business. Oxford:Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Elkington, J. 2006. Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance, 14: 522–529.Google Scholar
  33. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. 2001. Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34: 585–604.Google Scholar
  34. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. 2010. The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21: 1092–1107.Google Scholar
  35. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1990. What’s a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 33: 233–258.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  37. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. FTSE. 2016. Index inclusion rules for the FTSE4Good index series. http://www.ftse.com/products/downloads/F4G-Index-Inclusion-Rules.pdf, Accessed July 28, 2016.
  39. Gallo, P., & Christensen, L. 2011. Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business and Society, 50: 315–349.Google Scholar
  40. Garvare, R., & Johansson, P. 2010. Management for sustainability - a stakeholder theory. Total Quality Management, 21: 737–744.Google Scholar
  41. Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35: 2388–2406.Google Scholar
  42. Giuli, A. D., & Kostovetsky, L. 2014. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111: 158–180.Google Scholar
  43. Gray, B. 2006. Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19: 793–819.Google Scholar
  44. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2014. GRI’s G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/g4/Pages/default.aspx, Accessed July 28, 2014.
  45. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2015. Sustainability reporting guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org., Accessed August 25, 2015.
  46. Graham, J. R., & Rogers, D. A. 2002. Do firms hedge in response to tax incentives? Journal of Finance, 57: 815–839.Google Scholar
  47. Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & Whittaker, J. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124: 633–657.Google Scholar
  48. Guay, W. R. 1999. The impact of derivatives on Þrm risk: An empirical examination of new derivative users. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26: 319–351.Google Scholar
  49. Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. 2010. Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1: 33–50.Google Scholar
  50. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. 2013. Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123: 401–420.Google Scholar
  51. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24: 391–430.Google Scholar
  52. Harrison, J., & Freeman, R. 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 479–485.Google Scholar
  53. Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18: 7–18.Google Scholar
  54. Henisz, W., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. 2011. Spinning gold: The financial returns to external stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 1: 1–6.Google Scholar
  55. Holliday, C. 2001. Sustainable growth, the Dupont way. Harvard Business Review, 79: 129–134.Google Scholar
  56. Hou, M., Liu, H., Fan, P. and Wei, Z. 2016. Does CSR practice pay off in East Asian firms? A meta-analytics investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33: 195-228.Google Scholar
  57. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). 2013. International Integrated Reporting Framework. http://www.theiirc.org/international-ir-framework, Accessed December 31, 2013.
  58. Jamali, D. 2007. The case of strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Business and Society Review, 112: 1–27.Google Scholar
  59. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 443–459.Google Scholar
  60. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. 2012. The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106: 53–72.Google Scholar
  61. Kilcullen, M., & Ohles Kooistra, J. 1999. At least do no harm: Sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Reference Services Review, 27: 158–178.Google Scholar
  62. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K. and Reeves, M. 2015. Joining forces: Collaboration and leadership for sustainability: The growing importance of corporate collaboration and boards of directors to sustainable business, MIT Sloan Management Review (together with The BCG Group and United Nations Global Compact). Jan. 2015.Google Scholar
  63. KPMG. 2013. GRI’s G4 guidelines: The impacts on reporting. KPMG International. Jun. 2013.Google Scholar
  64. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. G. 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13: 373–385.Google Scholar
  65. Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. 1993. Cross sectional determinants of analysts rating of corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 31: 246–271.Google Scholar
  66. Lau, C. K. 2016. How corporate derivatives use impact firm performance? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40: 102–114.Google Scholar
  67. Li, W., & Zhang, R. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96: 631–645.Google Scholar
  68. Lo, S.-F., & Sheu, H.-J. 2007. Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 345–358.Google Scholar
  69. Lourenço, I. C., Branco, M. C., Curto, J. D., & Eugenio, T. 2012. How does the market value corporate sustainability performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 108: 417–428.Google Scholar
  70. Lucas, M. T., & Noordewier, T. G. 2016. Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal Production Economics, 175: 24–34.Google Scholar
  71. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817–835.Google Scholar
  72. Malik, M. 2015. Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 419–438.Google Scholar
  73. Marsden, C., & Andriof, J. 1998. Towards an understanding of corporate citizenship and how to influence it. Citizenship Studies, 2: 329–352.Google Scholar
  74. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603–609.Google Scholar
  75. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy Management Review, 25: 117–127.Google Scholar
  76. Mcwilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1–18.Google Scholar
  77. Metaxas, T., & Tsavdaridou, M. 2013. CSR in metallurgy sector in Greece: A content analysis. Resources Policy, 38: 295–309.Google Scholar
  78. Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52: 400–407.Google Scholar
  79. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf, Accessed August 15, 2014.
  80. Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. 2007. Corporate social performance content of innovation in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 80: 711–725.Google Scholar
  81. Peloza, J. 2009. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35: 1518–1541.Google Scholar
  82. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. 2011. How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39: 117–135.Google Scholar
  83. Perez-Gonzalez, F., & Yun, H. 2013. Risk management and firm value: Evidence from weather derivatives. Journal of Finance, 68: 2143–2176.Google Scholar
  84. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. 2006. Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Dec. 2006.Google Scholar
  85. Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montuori, A. 1995. Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an eco-centric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20: 1053–1089.Google Scholar
  86. PwC. 2013. Going beyond philanthropy: Pulse-check on sustainability. PriceWaterhouse Coopers Malaysia, Feb. 2013.Google Scholar
  87. Razaee, Z. 2016. Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36: 48–64.Google Scholar
  88. Richardson, A. J., Welker, M., & Hutchinson, I. R. 1999. Managing capital market reactions to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1: 17–43.Google Scholar
  89. Roberts, M., & Whited, T. 2013. Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In: Constantinides, G., Harris, M., Stulz, R. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2, Part A, 493–572.Google Scholar
  90. Scholtens, B. 2009. Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86: 159–175.Google Scholar
  91. Securities Commission Malaysia (SCM). 2012. Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012. http://www.sc.com.my/wp-content/uploads/eng/html/cg/cg2012.pdf, Accessed August 15, 2014.
  92. Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59: 1045–1061.Google Scholar
  93. Scott, E. M., Cocchi, D., & Gemmell, J. C. 2014. Defining a fit for purpose statistically reliable sustainability indicator. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5: 262–267.Google Scholar
  94. Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) 2010. Real obstacles, real opportunities. Discussion paper presented for the SSE 2010. London:Global Dialogue.Google Scholar
  95. Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) 2014. Report on progress. Discussion paper presented for the SSE 2014. London:Global Dialogue.Google Scholar
  96. Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE). 2016. About sustainable stock exchanges initiative sustainable stock exchanges. http://www.sseinitiative.org/about/, Accessed July 30, 2016.
  97. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 463–490.Google Scholar
  98. Van-Marrewijk, M. 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44: 95–105.Google Scholar
  99. Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. 2015. How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131: 469–486.Google Scholar
  100. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. 1997. The corporate social performance financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 303–317.Google Scholar
  101. Waddock, S. 2008. Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22: 87–108.Google Scholar
  102. Wagner, M. 2010. The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69: 1553–1560.Google Scholar
  103. Wiseman, J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7: 53–63.Google Scholar
  104. Xie, S., & Hayase, K. 2007. Corporate environmental performance evaluation: A measurement model and a new concept. Business Strategy and Environment, 16: 148–168.Google Scholar
  105. Zu, L., & Song, L. 2009. Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 105–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Malaysia CampusSemenyihMalaysia

Personalised recommendations