Advertisement

Family firms and internationalization: An organizational learning perspective

  • Eric W. K. Tsang
Article
  • 178 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an organizational learning perspective of family firms’ internationalization, an important yet neglected theoretical lens in this domain of research. The discussion is based on Huber’s (Organization Science, 2(1): 88–115, 1991) typology of learning processes, which includes knowledge acquisition (with five subprocesses: experiential learning, vicarious learning, congenital learning, searching and grafting), information distribution, information interpretation and organizational memory. Family firms exhibit different learning behaviors compared to their non-family counterparts. Moreover, there are differences between traditional and professional family firms. Theoretically-significant propositions can be derived from the differences among the three types of firms that may guide empirical research.

Keywords

Family firms Organizational learning Internationalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the helpful comments given by the guest editors for improving my paper.

References

  1. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  2. Armario, J. M., Ruiz, D. M., & Armario, E. M. 2008. Market orientation and internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4): 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arregle, J.-L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & van Essen, M. 2017. Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(5): 801–831.Google Scholar
  4. Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1): 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arregle, J.-L., Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., & Hitt, M. A. 2012. Internationalization of family-controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6): 1115–1143.Google Scholar
  6. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7–26.Google Scholar
  7. Basly, S. 2007. The internationalization of family SME: An organizational learning and knowledge development perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(2): 154–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. 2010. Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2): 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney, M. 1998. A management capacity constraint? Obstacles to the development of the overseas Chinese family business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2): 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3): 249–265.Google Scholar
  12. Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., Acedo, F. J., Gallego, M. A., & Ramos, E. 2009. An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal of World Business, 44(3): 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, S. J., & Shim, J. 2015. When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance?. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9): 1297–1316.Google Scholar
  14. Chirico, F. 2008. Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26(4): 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chirico, F., & Salvato, C. 2008. Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21(2): 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(5): 555–576.Google Scholar
  17. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Bergiel, E. B. 2009. An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(2): 355–372.Google Scholar
  18. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. 1999. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4): 19–39.Google Scholar
  19. Cyert, R., & March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H. J., Yavuz, R. I., & Zhou, L. 2012. Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research: Past accomplishments and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Efferin, S., & Hartono, M. S. 2015. Management control and leadership styles in family business: An Indonesian case study. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(1): 130–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ensley, M. D., & Pearson, A. W. 2005. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3): 267–284.Google Scholar
  23. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. 2000. Effect of variation on knowledge accumulation in the internationalization process. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(1): 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernhaber, S. A., Gilbert, B. A., & McDougall, P. P. 2008. International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2): 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernhaber, S. A., & Li, D. 2010. The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  26. Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2012. The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4): 1010–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. 1997. Generation to generation: Life cycles of family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gersick, K. E., Lansberg, I., Desjardins, M., & Dunn, B. 1999. Stages and transitions: Managing change in the family business. Family Business Review, 12(4): 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. 2010. Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton, E. 2011. Entrepreneurial learning in family business: A situated learning perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1): 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. 2004. The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5): 586–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B., & Reay, T. 2013. Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2): 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, G. R. 1983. Transaction costs, property rights, and organizational culture: An exchange perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3): 454–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., & Murru, A. 2015. The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4): 332–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–51.Google Scholar
  38. Li, J., Li, Y., & Shapiro, D. 2012. Knowledge seeking and outward FDI of emerging market firms: The moderating effect of inward FDI. Global Strategy Journal, 2(4): 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma, W. 2015. Li Ka-shing defends business strategy. Wall Street Journal, September 29: https://www.wsj.com/articles/li-ka-shing-defends-his-business-strategy-1443545297.
  40. Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Tacitness, learning, and international expansion: A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry. Organization Science, 14(3): 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2009. Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 802–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 2005. Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(5): 537–554.Google Scholar
  43. Pérez-González, F. 2006. Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5): 1559–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. 1997. Twenty years after - Support and critique of the Uppsala internationalization model. In I. Björkman, & M. Forsgren (Eds.). The nature of the international firm: 117–134. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. 2014. The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2): 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4): 420–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  48. Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. 2012. Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. 1996. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2): 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsang, E. W. K. 1999. Internationalization as a learning process: Singapore MNCs in China. Academy of Management Executive, 13(1): 91–101.Google Scholar
  51. Tsang, E. W. K. 2001. Internationalizing the family firm: A case study of a Chinese family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1): 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsang, E. W. K. 2002a. Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9): 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsang, E. W. K. 2002b. Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsang, E. W. K. 2017. How the concept of organizational unlearning contributes to studies of learning organizations: A personal reflection. Learning Organization, 24(1): 39–48.Google Scholar
  55. Tsang, E. W. K., & Yamanoi, J. 2016. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11): 2291–2306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tsang, E. W. K., & Zahra, S. 2008. Organizational unlearning. Human Relations, 61(10): 1435–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsao, S. M., & Lien, W. H. 2013. Family management and internationalization: The impact on firm performance and innovation. Management International Review, 53(2): 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsui-Auch, L. S. 2003. Learning strategies of small and medium-sized Chinese family firms: A comparative study of two suppliers in Singapore. Management Learning, 34(2): 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsui-Auch, L. S. 2004. The professionally managed family-ruled enterprise: Ethnic Chinese business in Singapore. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4): 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. 2007. Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(3): 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. 2007. “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5): 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zahra, S. A. 2003. International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950.Google Scholar
  65. Zhou, L. 2007. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and foreign market knowledge on early internationalization. Journal of World Business, 42(3): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naveen Jindal School of ManagementUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations