Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 499–527 | Cite as

Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms

  • Jar-Der Luo
  • Ke RongEmail author
  • Kunhao Yang
  • Rong Guo
  • YaQi Zou
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the different syndication behavior in various types of Chinese venture capitals (VC), in particular it focuses on foreign, private-owned and state-owned VC firms and these firms’ behavior when faced with institutional uncertainties. Mixed methods data analysis was conducted using the Simuton database of 1,173 VC firms and snowball interviews were also conducted in the Chinese state-owned and private-owned VCs as well as foreign VCs. Findings indicate foreign VC investors are more willing to build much denser relationships than those of Chinese state-owned and private VC firms in order to overcome the uncertainty. This result provides additional evidence that adopting close relationships or a guanxi-based (informal social network) strategy does not only depend on cultural issues such as East Asian culture, but also on high institutional uncertainty. Furthermore, this paper develops four propositions on how VC firms establish syndication influenced by high institutional uncertainty. Finally, the conclusion and discussion sections put forward implications to VC companies about how informal social networks facilitate the internationalization process and growth in foreign markets.

Keywords

Guanxi (informal social network) Venture capital (VC) Syndication Liability of foreignness State-owned Social embeddedness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support of Center for Social Network Research, Tsinghua University and Tsinghua’s research project “Trust and Guanxi Studies on Internet,” Project No. 20121088015, as well as the support of Chinese Natural Science Foundation Project “Social Network in Big Data Analysis: A Case in Investment Network,” Project No. 71372053 and 71402051, and National 863 Project No. 20141860074.

References

  1. Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. 1994. Robust financial contracting and the role of venture capitalists. Journal of Finance, 49(2): 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabasi, A.-L. 2005. Taming complexity. Nature Physics, 1: 68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 600–628.Google Scholar
  6. Brander, J. A., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. 2002. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(3): 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bygrave, W. D. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2): 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bygrave, W. D. 1988. The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2): 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, H., & Chen, T.-J. 1998. Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 445–467.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, T.-J. 2003. Network resources for internationalization: The case of Taiwan’s electronics firms. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5): 1107–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiplin, B., Robbie, K., Wright, M., & others. 1997. The syndication of venture capital deals: Buy-outs and buy-ins. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 21(4): 9–19.Google Scholar
  13. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, J. 1990. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  15. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunning, J. H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4): 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G., & Wang, Z. 1992. From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society: A translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an introduction and epilogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Golafshani, N. 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 8(4): 597–607.Google Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology: 481–510.Google Scholar
  22. Granovetter, M. 1995. The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In A. Portes (Ed.). The economic sociology of immigration: Essays in networks, ethnicity and entrepreneurship: 128–165. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Granovetter, M. 2000. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk4g08q.pdf, Accessed Oct. 7, 2016.
  24. Granovetter, M. 2002. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In M. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.). The new economic sociology: Developents in an emergent field: 35–59. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. 2017. Society and economy—Framework and principles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M., & Ferrary, M. 2009. The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38(2): 326–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hemmert, M. 1999. Intermediate organization’revisited: A framework for the vertical division of labor in manufacturing and the case of the Japanese assembly industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(3): 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62(1): 251–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. 2010. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 65(3): 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holmstrom, B., 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2): 324–340.Google Scholar
  33. Hsu, F. L. 1963. Clan, caste and club: A comparative study of Chinese, Hindu, and American ways of life. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  34. Hwang, K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology: 944–974.Google Scholar
  35. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. 2015. Internationalisation in industrial systems—A network approach. In ​M. Forsgren, U. Holm, & J. Johanson (Eds.). Knowledge, networks and power: 111–132. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kogut, B., Urso, P., & Walker, G. 2007. Emergent properties of a new financial market: American venture capital syndication, 1960-2005. Management Science, 53(7): 1181–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. 2001. The syndication of venture capital investments. Omega, 29(5): 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lu, H., Trienekens, J. H., Omta, S. W. F., & Feng, S. 2009. The role of guanxi networks in vegetable supply chains: Empirical evidence from PR China. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 21(2): 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luo, J.-D., & Cheng, M.-Y. 2015. Guanxi circles’ effect on organizational trust—Bringing power and vertical social exchanges into intra-organizational network analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8): 1024–1037.Google Scholar
  42. Luo, J.-D., Zou, Y., & Guo, R. 2016. Distinction of joint investment propensity of Chinese venture capital. Modern Finance and Economics, 13(4): 1–15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  43. Luo, Y. 1997. Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human Systems Management, 16: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. 1984. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2): 482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayer, A., 1966. The significance of quasi-groups in the study of complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.). The antropology of complex societies: 97–122. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Ou, C., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. 2014. Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Quarterly, 38(1): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. 2012. The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Polidoro, F., Ahuja, G., & Mitchell, W. 2011. When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences1. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4): 1132–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rong, K., Wu, J., Shi, Y., & Guo, L. 2015. Nurturing business ecosystems for growth in a foreign market: Incubating, identifying and integrating stakeholders. Journal of International Management, 21(4): 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rowley, T. J., Greve, H. R., Rao, H., Baum, J. A., & Shipilov, A. V. 2005. Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. 2009. Research methods for business students​, 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, H. A. 1976. Administrative behavior; A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, 3rd ed. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2015047957, Accessed Oct. 7, 2016.
  55. Small, M. L. 2011. How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1): 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2008. Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2): 266–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. 2000. Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Stoian, C. 2013. Extending Dunning’s investment development path: The role of home country institutional determinants in explaining outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 22(3): 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. 2010. A research model for guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6): 1195–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tykvová, T. 2007. Who chooses whom? Syndication, skills and reputation. Review of Financial Economics, 16(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vahlne, J.-E., Schweizer, R., & Johanson, J. 2012. Overcoming the liability of outsidership—The challenge of HQ of the global firm. Journal of International Management, 18(3): 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williamson, O. E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williamson, O. E. 1995. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond: 207–256. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, O. E. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Williamson, O. E., & Winter, S. G. 1993. The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, R. 1968. The theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36(1): 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. 1998. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1): 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yin, R., 2008. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jar-Der Luo
    • 1
  • Ke Rong
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kunhao Yang
    • 1
  • Rong Guo
    • 3
  • YaQi Zou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, School of Social ScienceTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Economics, School of Social ScienceTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Science and Technology Investment, Ministry of Science and TechnologyChinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development (CASTED)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations