Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 33–59 | Cite as

An institutional response model to economic liberalization: Japanese MNEs’ ownership choices in China

  • Megan Min ZhangEmail author
  • Paul W. Beamish


This study investigates how Japanese MNEs are adapting their ownership choices to accommodate China’s economic liberalization. Drawing upon the institution-based view of the firm, we propose an institutional response model that is simultaneously based on the progress of economic liberalization and the accumulation of subsidiary experience. This model suggests that Japanese MNEs increasingly adopt higher ownership levels in their subsidiaries because of the combined effects of deepening deregulation on foreign investments, declining pure uncertainty, and increasing contingent uncertainty during economic liberalization. It also suggests that the progress of economic liberalization continuously changes the combination of the two types of institutional uncertainty (pure and contingent), contextualizing the influence of subsidiary experience on Japanese MNEs’ ownership choices. Using data for Japanese investments in China between 1991 and 2013, we construct a latent growth-curve model to provide empirical evidence for the proposed institutional response model.


Economic liberalization Ownership Institutional uncertainty Subsidiary experience 


  1. Acquaah, M. 2007. Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 1235–1255.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979–996.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, D. J., & Quelch, J. A. 1998. New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1): 7–20.Google Scholar
  6. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.Google Scholar
  7. Beamish, P. W. 1993. The characteristics of joint ventures in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Marketing, 1(2): 29–48.Google Scholar
  8. Beamish, P. W., & Inkpen, A. C. 1998. Japanese firms and the decline of the Japanese expatriate. Journal of World Business, 33(1): 35–50.Google Scholar
  9. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 600–628.Google Scholar
  10. Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Wilkinson, T. J. 1995. Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3): 2–25.Google Scholar
  11. Brouthers, L. E., Gao, Y., & Napshin, S. 2014. Keiretsu centrality—Profits and profit stability: A power dependence perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(12): 2603–2610.Google Scholar
  12. Buiter, W., & Rahbari, E. 2011. Global growth generators: Moving beyond emerging markets and BRICs. CEPR Policy Insight paper no. 55: April, CEPR and Citigroup.Google Scholar
  13. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.Google Scholar
  14. Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., & Riesenberger, J. 2014. International business: The new realities, 3rd ed. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2010. Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11): 1226–1243.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, S.-J., Chung, J., & Moon, J. J. 2013. When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures?. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 317–337.Google Scholar
  17. Child, J., & Tse, D. K. 2001. China's transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
  18. Chung, C., Lu, J., & Beamish, P. 2008. Multinational networks during times of economic crisis versus stability. Management International Review, 48(3): 279–296.Google Scholar
  19. Contractor, F. J. 1990. Ownership patterns of US joint ventures abroad and the liberalization of foreign government regulations in the 1980s: Evidence from the benchmark surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1): 55–73.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. 2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 239–258.Google Scholar
  21. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 915–933.Google Scholar
  22. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 1028–1038.Google Scholar
  23. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. Joint venture performance revisited: Japanese foreign subsidiaries worldwide. Management International Review, 44(1): 69–91.Google Scholar
  24. Delios, A., Beamish, P. W., & Lu, J. W. 2010. Business groups, international business: An Asia Pacific perspective, 2nd ed.: 235–258. Singapore: Pearson.Google Scholar
  25. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2000. Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 305–323.Google Scholar
  26. Demirbag, M., Glaister, K. W., & Tatoglu, E. 2007. Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 418–434.Google Scholar
  27. Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. Effect of equity ownership on the survival of international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 295–305.Google Scholar
  28. Doz, Y. L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 55–83.Google Scholar
  29. Erramilli, M. K. 1996. Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2): 225–248.Google Scholar
  30. Fan, G., & Wang, X. 2001. NERI index of marketization of China by province (2000). Beijing: Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
  31. Figueira-de-Lemos, F., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2011. Risk management in the internationalization process of the firm: A note on the Uppsala model. Journal of World Business, 46(2): 143–153.Google Scholar
  32. Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. 2010. A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 377–396.Google Scholar
  33. Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(2): 305–336.Google Scholar
  34. Gaur, A. S., Delios, A., & Singh, K. 2007. Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management, 33(4): 611–636.Google Scholar
  35. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. 2007. Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1): 84–110.Google Scholar
  36. Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. G., & Nielsen, B. B. 2013. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 427–450.Google Scholar
  37. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1990. Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  38. Gong, Y. 2003. Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resources, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 728–739.Google Scholar
  39. Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Nyaw, M.-K. 2007. Do multiple parents help or hinder international joint venture performance? The mediating roles of contract completeness and partner cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 1021–1034.Google Scholar
  40. Grabowiecki, J. 2006. Keiretsu groups: Their role in the Japanese economy and a reference point (or a paradigm) for other countries. Visiting Research Fellow Monograph Series. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  41. Hennart, J.-F. 1991. The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4): 483–497.Google Scholar
  42. Hennart, J.-F., & Larimo, J. 1998. The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions?. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 515–538.Google Scholar
  43. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. 2000. Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 449–467.Google Scholar
  44. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 249–267.Google Scholar
  46. Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 177–202.Google Scholar
  47. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
  48. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.Google Scholar
  49. Jung, J. C., Beamish, P. W., & Goerzen, A. 2008. FDI ownership strategy: A Japanese-US MNE comparison. Management International Review, 48(5): 491–524.Google Scholar
  50. Jung, J. C., Beamish, P. W., & Goerzen, A. 2010. Dynamics of experience, environment and MNE ownership strategy. Management International Review, 50(3): 267–296.Google Scholar
  51. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–51.Google Scholar
  52. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6): 63–76.Google Scholar
  53. Knight, F. 1921. Risk, uncertaity, and profit. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  54. Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308–324.Google Scholar
  55. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64–81.Google Scholar
  56. Kriauciunas, A., & Kale, P. 2006. The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in lithuania. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 659–679.Google Scholar
  57. Lau, L. J., Qian, Y., & Roland, G. 2000. Reform without losers: An interpretation of China’s dual-track approach to transition. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1): 120–143.Google Scholar
  58. Li, J. 1995. Foreign entry and survival: Effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5): 333–351.Google Scholar
  59. Li, J., & Li, Y. 2010. Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1550–1571.Google Scholar
  60. Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., & Shao, A. T. 2009. Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: An interactive perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2): 339–352.Google Scholar
  61. Li, P.-Y., & Meyer, K. E. 2009. Contextualizing experience effects in international business: A study of ownership strategies. Journal of World Business, 44(4): 370–382.Google Scholar
  62. Lin, Y.-M. 2001. Between politics and markets: Firms, competition, and institutional change in post-Mao China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Luo, Y. 1998. Joint venture success in China: How should we select a good partner?. Journal of World Business, 33(2): 145–166.Google Scholar
  64. Luo, Y. 2003. Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent-subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3): 290–309.Google Scholar
  65. Luo, Y. 2005. How important are shared perceptions of procedural justice in cooperative alliances?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4): 695–709.Google Scholar
  66. Ma, X., Tong, T. W., & Fitza, M. 2013. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1): 66–87.Google Scholar
  67. Mahlich, J. C. 2010. Patents and performance in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry: An institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 99–113.Google Scholar
  68. Mair, J., Mart, I., & Ventresca, M. J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 819–850.Google Scholar
  69. Makino, S., & Beamish, P. W. 1998a. Local ownership restrictions, entry mode choice, and FDI performance: Japanese overseas subsidiaries in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2): 119–136.Google Scholar
  70. Makino, S., & Beamish, P. W. 1998b. Performance and survival of joint ventures with non-conventional ownership structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4): 797–818.Google Scholar
  71. Makino, S., Beamish, P. W., & Zhao, N. B. 2004. The characteristics and performance of Japanese FDI in less developed and developed countries. Journal of World Business, 39(4): 377–392.Google Scholar
  72. Makino, S., & Delios, A. 1996. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5): 905–927.Google Scholar
  73. Makino, S., & Neupert, K. E. 2000. National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 705–713.Google Scholar
  74. McGahan, A. M., & Porter, M. E. 1997. How much does industry matter, really?. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer SI): 15–30.Google Scholar
  75. McGuire, J., & Dow, S. 2002. The Japanese keiretsu system: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(1): 33–40.Google Scholar
  76. McGuire, J., & Dow, S. 2009. Japanese keiretsu: Past, present, future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(2): 333–351.Google Scholar
  77. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. 2005. Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 63–93.Google Scholar
  78. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
  79. Mjoen, H., & Tallman, S. 1997. Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organization Science, 8(3): 257–274.Google Scholar
  80. Neter, J. W., & Michael, H. K. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. Boston: Irwin.Google Scholar
  81. Newman, K. L. 2000. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 602–619.Google Scholar
  82. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  83. Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. 2000. The importance of identifying levels in multilevel analysis: An illustration of the effects of ignoring the top or intermediate levels in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1): 103–130.Google Scholar
  84. Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K. R. 1996. Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 36(1): 45.Google Scholar
  85. Park, S. H., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. 2006. Market liberalization and firm performance during China’s economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1): 127–147.Google Scholar
  86. Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 455–477.Google Scholar
  87. Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. 2001. Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1): 37–53.Google Scholar
  88. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.Google Scholar
  89. Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. 2017. An institution-based view of global IPR history. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 893–907.Google Scholar
  90. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 492–528.Google Scholar
  91. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486–501.Google Scholar
  92. Peng, M. W., & Pleggenkuhle-Miles, E. G. 2009. Current debates in global strategy. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1): 51–68.Google Scholar
  93. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3): 63–81.Google Scholar
  94. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.Google Scholar
  95. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  96. Puck, J. F., Holtbrügge, D., Mohr, A. T., Lee, S.-H., & Makhija, M. 2009. Beyond entry mode choice: Explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly owned subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 388–404.Google Scholar
  97. Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. 2011. Two decades of Russian business and management research: An institutional theory perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2): 21–36.Google Scholar
  98. Qian, G., Li, L., Li, J., & Qian, Z. 2008. Regional diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2): 197–214.Google Scholar
  99. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. 2012. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station: StataCorp.Google Scholar
  100. Roland, G. 2002. The political economy of transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 29–50.Google Scholar
  101. Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715–735.Google Scholar
  102. Scott, W. R. 2014. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  103. Shetty, Y. K. 1979. Managing the multinational corporation: European and American styles. Management International Review, 19(3): 39–48.Google Scholar
  104. Shi, W., Markóczy, L., & Stan, C. V. 2014. The continuing importance of political ties in China. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1): 57–75.Google Scholar
  105. Shi, W., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. 2012. Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7): 1221–1245.Google Scholar
  106. Shi, W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B. C., & Peng, M. W. 2014. Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: Evidence from international joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3): 338–362.Google Scholar
  107. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. 2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Stopford, J. M., & Wells, L. T. 1972. Managing the multinational enterprise: Organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  109. Tan, J., & Tan, D. 2005. Environment–strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 141–157.Google Scholar
  110. Thomas, L. G., III, & Waring, G. 1999. Competing capitalisms: Capital investment in American, German, and Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 729–748.Google Scholar
  111. Wilkinson, T. J., Peng, G. Z., Brouthers, L. E., & Beamish, P. W. 2008. The diminishing effect of cultural distance on subsidiary control. Journal of International Management, 14(2): 93–107.Google Scholar
  112. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  113. Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. 1994. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 253–273.Google Scholar
  114. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  115. Xia, J., Tan, J., & Tan, D. 2008. Mimetic entry and bandwagon effect: The rise and decline of international equity joint venture in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 195–217.Google Scholar
  116. Xiong, Y. 2009. Chinese opening: Changing game models between the Western and Chinese enterprises [中国流:改变中外企业博弈的格局]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies?. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(1): 59–82.Google Scholar
  118. Yang, X., Jiang, Y., Kang, R., & Ke, Y. 2009. A comparative analysis of the internationalization of Chinese and Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 141–162.Google Scholar
  119. Ye, H. 2012. MNC flexibility and post-entry mode change: The role of learning ownership regulations through network embeddedness. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11(8): 871–880.Google Scholar
  120. Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. 2004. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 524–544.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCD College of BusinessUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Ivey Business SchoolWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations