Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 1139–1160 | Cite as

The strategic and cultural legitimacy of HR professionalization in Hong Kong

  • Paul HigginsEmail author
  • Man-fung Lo
Article
  • 284 Downloads

Abstract

In Hong Kong, human resources (HR) practice has reached a point of professionalization not yet apparent in other parts of China creating opportunities for best practice diffusion across rapidly developing cities, provinces, and regions. The aim of this paper is to ascertain the strategic and cultural legitimacy of human resource management (HRM) in Hong Kong from the perspective of the occupation’s status as an emerging profession. Combining established theory on professions with documented insights from normative associational ideals, this paper derives four major sources of HR professionalization, which it entitles strategy, communication, administration, and discipline. Assuming that tasks performed by the most senior, qualified and experienced practitioners hold greatest empirical sway over the prospect of occupational association, this study finds that a combination of strategic and communication practices emerge as the two most likely routes to HR professionalization. Based on survey responses from a representative sample of 172 certified practitioners, the findings support the notion of HR as a strategic asset, raising important implications for the professional status of the occupation within an Asian management context.

Keywords

Cultural assets Strategic assets Hong Kong Human resource management Professionalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to thank the Hong Kong Institute of Human Resouce Management for providing access to their certified members.

Funding information

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the ESRC/RGC Joint Research Scheme sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong and the Economic & Social Research Council of the United Kingdom (Project reference no. 9057004 RGC ref. ES/J017299/1).

References

  1. Abbott, A. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ackroyd, S. 1996. Organization contra organizations: Professions and organizational change in the United Kingdom. Organization Studies, 17(4): 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Publishing in the Asia Pacific journal of management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alagappa, M. 2001. Military professionalism in Asia: Conceptual and empirical perspectives. Hawaii: Government Institutes.Google Scholar
  5. Alagaraja, M., & Wang, J. 2012. Development of a national HRD strategy model: Cases of India and China. Human Resource Development Review, 11(4): 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, M. 2011. Policy, professionalism, professionality and the development of HR practitioners in the UK. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(5): 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels, J., Peters, O., de Jong, M., Pruyn, A., & van der Molen, M. 2010. Horizontal and vertical communication as determinants of professional and organisational identification. Personnel Review, 39(2): 210–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brint, S. G. 1994. An age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burrage, M., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.) 1990. Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, N., Chillas, S., & Muhr, S. L. 2012. Professions at the margins. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 12(3): 259–272.Google Scholar
  11. Carr-Saunders, A. M., & Wilson, P. A. 1933. The professions. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  12. Chow, I. H.-s., Teo, S. T. T., & Chew, I. K.-H. 2013. HRM systems and firm performance: The mediation role of strategic orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CIPD. 2012. HR profession map our professional standards. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  14. CIPD. 2013a. New associate member criteria from 2010. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  15. CIPD. 2013b. New chartered member criteria from 2010. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  16. CIPD. 2013c. New fellow member criteria from 2010. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, D. J. 2015. HR past, present and future: A call for consistent practices and a focus on competencies. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2): 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooke, F. L. 2005. HRM, work and employment in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Cooke, F. L. 2009. A decade of transformation of HRM in China: A review of literature and suggestions for future studies. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(1): 6–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooke, F. L. 2013. Human resource management in China: New trends and practices. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, F. L., & Saini, D. S. 2015. From legalism to strategic HRM in India? Grievance management in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3): 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cramer, D. 2003. Advanced quantitative data analysis. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  23. Dowling, P. J., & Fisher, C. 1997. The Australian HR professional: A 1995 profile. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 35(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evetts, J. 2006. Short note: The sociology of professional groups: New directions. Current Sociology, 54(1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evetts, J. 2013. Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology, 61(5–6): 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fanning, B. 2011. Human resource management: The road to professionalization in the UK and USA. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Kingston University, London.Google Scholar
  27. Farndale, E., & Brewster, C. 2005. Search of legitimacy: Personnel management associations worldwide. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faulconbridge, J., & Muzio, D. 2008. Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms. Work, Employment & Society, 22(1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Francis, H., & Keegan, A. 2006. The changing face of HRM: In search of balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(3): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freidson, E. 1986. Professional powers: A study of the institutionalisation of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gilmore, S., & Williams, S. 2007. Conceptualising the ‘personnel professional’: A critical analysis of the chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s professional qualification scheme. Personnel Review, 36(3): 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gold, J., & Bratton, J. 2003. The dynamics of professionalization: Whither the HRM profession. Paper presented at the Third Critical Management Studies Conference, Stream 8, Lancaster University, July 7–9.Google Scholar
  34. Guest, D. E. 2011. Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. HKIHRM. 2000. Code of conduct and ethics for human resource professionals. Hong Kong: HKIHRM.Google Scholar
  36. HKIHRM. 2010. Professional standards guide. Hong Kong: HKIHRM.Google Scholar
  37. HKIHRM. 2011. Career development guide. Hong Kong: HKIHRM.Google Scholar
  38. Hope-Hailey, V., Farndale, E., & Truss, C. 2005. The HR department’s role in organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horn, R. C. 1978. On professions, professionals, and professional ethics. Malvern: American Institute for Property and Liability Underwriters.Google Scholar
  40. Jin, J. C., & Yau, L. 1999. Research productivity of the economics profession in East Asia. Economic Inquiry, 37(4): 706–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jing, F. F., Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. 2014. Enhancing performance in small professional firms through vision communication and sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson, M. S. 1977. The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. 2003. HR as a strategic partner: What does it take to make it happen? Human Resource Planning, 26(3): 15–29.Google Scholar
  44. Legge, K. 1978. Power, innovation and problem solving in personnel management. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Aguinis, H. 2012. What is the value of human resource certification? A multi-level framework for research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(4): 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, Y., Lam, L. W., & Loi, R. 2014. Examining professionals’ identification in the workplace: The roles of organizational prestige, work-unit prestige, and professional status. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 789–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahoney, T. A., & Deckop, J. R. 1986. Evolution of concept and practice in personnel administration/human resource management (PA/HRM). Journal of Management, 12(2): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. 2005. Human resource management at work. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  49. Meigh, I. 1966. Business management. In H. Volmer, & D. Mills (Eds.). Professionalization: 163–168. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. 2012. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Berkeley: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Michelson, G., & Kramar, R. 2003. The state of HRM in Australia: Progress and prospects. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources., 41(2): 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Millerson, G. 1964. The qualifying associations: A study in professionalization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  54. Muzio, D., Hodgson, D., Faulconbridge, J., Beaverstock, J., & Hall, S. 2011. Towards corporate professionalization: The case of project management, management consultancy and executive search. Current Sociology, 59(4): 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I. 2011. Introduction: Professions and organizations-a conceptual framework. Current Sociology, 59(4): 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Noordegraaf, M. 2011. Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32(10): 1349–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Packard, T. 2009. Leadership and performance in human services organizations. In R. J. Patti (Ed.). The handbook of human services management: 143–164. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Pallant, J. 2016. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 6th ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Parkes, C., & Davis, A. J. 2013. Ethics and social responsibility–do HR professionals have the ‘courage to challenge’ or are they set to be permanent ‘bystanders? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(12): 2411–2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parsons, T. 1939. The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reed, M. I. 1996. Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies, 17(4): 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Savage, M., Barlow, J., Dickens, P., & Fielding, A. 1992. Property, bureaucracy and culture: Middle class formation in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Sheehan, C., & De Cieri, H. 2012. Charting the strategic trajectory of the Australian HR professional. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(2): 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H., Cooper, B. K., & Brooks, R. 2016. The impact of HR political skill in the HRM and organisational performance relationship. Australian Journal of Management, 41(1): 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Starr, P. 1982. The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  67. Suddaby, R., & Viale, T. 2011. Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4): 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Takeuchi, N., Wakabayashi, M., & Chen, Z. 2003. The strategic HRM configuration for competitive advantage: Evidence from Japanese firms in China and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(4): 447–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, S., & Woodhams, C. (Eds.) 2012. Managing people and organisations. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  70. Teo, S. T., & Rodwell, J. J. 2007. To be strategic in the new public sector, HR must remember its operational activities. Human Resource Management, 46(2): 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tolbert, P. S. 1990. Review of the book the system of professions: An essay on the division of labor. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2): 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tsui, A. P., & Lai, K. T. (Eds.) 2009. Professional practices of human resource management in Hong Kong: Linking HRM to organizational success. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Uen, J. F., Ahlstrom, D., Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, P. W. 2012. Increasing HR’s strategic participation: The effect of HR service quality and contribution expectations. Human Resource Management, 51(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ulrich, D., Younger, J., Brockbank, W., & Ulrich, M. 2012. HR from the outside in: Six competencies for the future of human resources. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Van Buren, III, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Sheehan, C. 2011. Strategic human resource management and the decline of employee focus. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3): 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wiley, C. 1995. Reexamining professional certification in human resource management. Human Resource Management, 34(2): 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao, S., & Du, J. 2012. Thirty-two years of development of human resource management in China: Review and prospects. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3): 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public PolicyCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.School of Professional Education & Executive Development, College of Professional & Continuing EducationThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations