Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking
- 1.4k Downloads
Globalization has been facing a backlash. By contrast, entrepreneurship has come to be seen as a panacea for economic development and generating jobs that are perceived to be under threat from globalization. In this Perspectives paper, our central argument is that globalization and entrepreneurship must be viewed holistically, recognizing that globalization is an enabler of important entrepreneurship outcomes. We argue that networks created as a byproduct of globalization facilitate various forms of entrepreneurship. Interpersonal networks (e.g., diasporas) facilitate transnational entrepreneurship which can, in turn, reduce institutional distance between locations. Interorganizational networks (e.g., MNE-orchestrated ecosystems) facilitate technology entrepreneurship which reinforces the institutional work that gives rise to new technological domains and fields. Intergovernmental and civil society networks facilitate social entrepreneurship which helps redress institutional voids. Thus globalization can be a force for good by enabling forms of entrepreneurship that enable important institutional change. We highlight the importance of paradox thinking, which is rooted in ancient Chinese philosophy, in transcending an either/or perspective of globalization and entrepreneurship.
KeywordsGlobalization Entrepreneurship International entrepreneurship Paradox thinking Institutional change Anti-globalization
We thank Stephen Young for helpful comments on an earlier draft, Geoff Jones for encouragement to pursue this piece and, especially, Mike Peng for very constructive editorial guidance.
- Bhagwati, J. N. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bhatt, B., Qureshi, I., & Riaz, S. 2017. Social entrepreneurship in non-munificent institutional environments and implications for institutional work: Insights from China. Journal of Business Ethics, in press.Google Scholar
- Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. 2009. Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33: 1001–1022.Google Scholar
- Ghemawat, P. 2016. The laws of globalization and business applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–50.Google Scholar
- Li, P. P. 2014. The unique value of yin-yang balancing: A critical response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332.Google Scholar
- Meyer, K. E. 2017. International business in an era of anti-globalization. Multinational Business Review, 25(2): 78–90.Google Scholar
- Pinkus, G., Mankiya, J., & Ramaswamy, S. 2017. We can’t undo globalization, but we can improve it. Harvard Business Review. Available at https://hbr.org/2017/01/we-cant-undo-globalization-but-we-can-improve-it.
- Prashantham, S. 2016. When globalisation meets entrepreneurship it can be a force for good. The Conversation. Available at http://theconversation.com/when-globalisation-meets-entrepreneurship-it-can-be-a-force-for-good-64415.
- Prashantham, S., & Yip, G. S. 2017. Engaging with startups in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2): 51–65.Google Scholar
- Prashantham, S., & Zhao, L. 2017. Testin: Partnering with multinational corporations [teaching case]. London, Ontario: Ivey Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ruggie, J. 2003. The United Nations and globalization: Patterns and limits of institutional adaptation. Global Governance, 9: 301–321.Google Scholar
- Saxenian, A. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. 2016. “Both/and” leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5): 62–70.Google Scholar
- Steinbock, D. 2013, Are global FDI flows entering a new era of “Asianisation”?. China Daily: Aug. 23. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2013-08/27/content_16922741.htm.
- Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Stiglitz, J. E. 2003. Globalization, technology, and Asian development. Asian Development Review, 20(2): 1–18.Google Scholar
- UNICEF. 2015. UNICEF’s Global Innovation Centre and innovation fund launch. Press release. Available at http://www.unicefstories.org/2015/05/12/unicefs-global-innovation-centre-and-innovation-fund-launch/.
- Woetzel, J., Lin, D.-Y., Seong, J., Madgavkar, A., & Lund, S. 2017. China’s role in the next phase of globalization. Discussion paper, McKinsey Global Institute. Google Scholar
- Wolf, M. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar