Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 723–766 | Cite as

YinYang bipolar dynamic organizational modeling for equilibrium-based decision analysis: Logical transformation of an indigenous philosophy to a global science

Article

Abstract

While it is recognized that indigenous research on China is helpful if not essential, the essence of YinYang has never been made clear in logical forms. While indigenous research should be guided by a philosophy, it was widely believed that without a unique logical system China only had culture but no philosophy. Now, worldwide indigenous research on China is faced with tremendous difficulties due to the lack of principles, academic disciplines, and a scientific common ground even though the Chinese YinYang has been widely influential. Consequently, a unique formal logical foundation is imperative for a logical reincarnation of Chinese philosophy. It is shown in this work that a formal equilibrium-based and harmony-centered YinYang bipolar dynamic logic (BDL) can fill the gap. Based on BDL, bipolar dynamic organizational modeling (BDOM) is proposed for equilibrium-based decision analysis (EBDA). It is shown that BDOM/EBDA methodologies can integrate case study methods and grounded theory together into a holistic and dynamic management paradigm for global regulation. The three philosophies of metaphysics, dialectics and the Dao of YinYang are formally classified and distinguished. It is argued that with BDL YinYang is elevated to a formal logical system, and indigenous research on China is positioned in the context of a global science with a common philosophical ground of equilibrium, complementarity, and harmony. It is concluded that, with YinYang as a philosophical guiding light, not only is bipolar dynamic equilibrium-based indigenous research helpful but also fundamental and essential.

Keywords

Logic of Chinese philosophy Socio-psychiatric modeling Cognitive mapping Quantum bioeconomics Operationalizability Classification of East-west philosophies 

References

  1. Ai, W., Narahari, J., & Roman, A. 2000. Yin Yang 1 negatively regulates the differentiation-specific E1 promoter of human papillomavirus type 6. Journal of Virology, 74(11): 5198–5205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. 1976. Structure of decision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, D. L., Townsend, D. W., Valk, P. E., & Maisey, M. N. 2005. Positron emission tomography: Basic sciences. Secaucus: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. BBC. 2006. Negative numbers. Last broadcast http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p003hyd9 on Mar. 9, 2006, 21:30 on BBC Radio 4.
  5. Bobko, P. 1985. Removing assumptions of bipolarity: Towards variation and circularity. Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 99–108.Google Scholar
  6. Bohr, N. 1948. On the notions of causality and complementarity. Dialectica, 2(3–4): 312–319.Google Scholar
  7. Boole, G. 1854. An investigation of the laws of thoughts. London: MacMillan. Reprinted by Dover Books, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Carey, B. 2007. Man regains speech after brain stimulation. The New York Times – Health: Aug. 1, 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/health/01cnd-brain.html.
  9. Charles HRH The Prince of Wales, Juniper, T., & Skelly, I. 2010. Harmony: A new way of looking at our world. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, M.-J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 179–199.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. 1985. Organizational behavior: Readings and exercises. New York: McGraw-Hill - Business & Economics.Google Scholar
  12. Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 155–170.Google Scholar
  13. Fink, G., & Yolles, M. 2015. Collective emotion regulation in an organisation—A plural agency with cognition and affect. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(5): 832–871.Google Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  15. Gore, J., & van Oudenaarden, A. 2009. Synthetic biology: The yin and yang of nature. Nature, 457(7227): 271–272.Google Scholar
  16. Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. 2010. The grand design. New York: Random House Digital.Google Scholar
  17. Hegel, G. W. F. 1805–6. Lectures on the history of philosophy. Trans. E. S. Haldane, 1892–6.Google Scholar
  18. Hume, D. 1738. In D. F. Norton & J. Mary (Eds.). A treatise of human nature. Norton: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hume, D. 1748. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Renascence Editions, https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/747/hume.pdf.
  20. Isaacson, W. 2008. Einstein: His life and universe. New York: Simon and Schuster: 388–389. Reported by the New York Times, April 25, 1929, under the headline “Einstein believes in ‘Spinoza’s God’”. Google Scholar
  21. Kim, J. D., Faulk, C., & Kim, J. 2007. Retroposition and evolution of the DNA-binding motifs of YY1, YY2 and REX1. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(10): 3442–3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosko, B. 1986. Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal Man-Machine Studies, 24: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leibniz, G. 1703. Explication de l’Arithmétique Binaire [Explanation of Binary Arithmetic]; Gerhardt, Mathematical Writings , VII: 223. An online translation by Lloyd Strickland.Google Scholar
  24. Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxial approach. Organization Studies, 19: 829.Google Scholar
  25. Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4: 413–439.Google Scholar
  26. Li, P. P. 2012a. Exploring the unique roles of trust and play in private creativity: From the complexity-ambiguity-metaphor link to the trust-play-creativity link. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1): 71–97.Google Scholar
  27. Li, P. P. 2012b. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 849–872.Google Scholar
  28. Li. P. P. 2012c. Toward research-practice balancing in management: The Yin-Yang method for open-ended and open-minded research. In C. L. Wang, D. J. Ketchen, & D. D. Bergh (Eds.). West meets East: Building theoretical bridges—Research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 8: 91–141. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Li, P. P. 2014. The unique value of Yin-Yang balancing: A critical response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332.Google Scholar
  30. Li, P. P. 2016. Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23: 42–77.Google Scholar
  31. Li, X. 2014. Can Yin-Yang guide Chinese indigenous management research?. Management and Organization Review, 10(1): 7–27.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, H., Schmidt-Supprian, M., Shi, Y., Hobeika, E., Barteneva, N., Jumaa, H., Pelanda, R., Reth, M., Skok, J., Rajewsky, K., & Shi, Y. 2007. Yin Yang 1 is a critical regulator of B-cell development. Genes and Development, 21: 1179–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palko, L., Bass, H. W., Beyrouthy, M. J., & Hurt, M. M. 2004. The Yin Yang-1 (YY1) protein undergoes a DNA-replication-associated switch in localization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus at the onset of S phase. Journal of Cell Science, 117: 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, B. 1913. On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Santiago, F. S., Ishii, H., Shafi, S., Khurana, R., Kanellakis, P., Bhindi, R., Ramirez, M. J., Bobik, A., Martin, J. F., Chesterman, C. N., Zachary, I. C., & Khachigian, L. M. 2007. Yin Yang-1 inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal, thickening by repressing p21WAF1/Cip1 transcription and p21WAF1/Cip1-Cdk4-Cyclin D1 assembly. Circulation Research, 101: 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi, Y., Seto, E., Chang, L.-S., & Shenk, T. 1991. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Kruppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell, 67(2): 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smolin, L. 2006. The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next?. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  40. Taleb, N. N. 2012. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.Google Scholar
  42. Vasudevan, S., Tong, Y., & Steitz, J. A. 2007. Switching from repression to activation: MicroRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science, 318(5858): 1931–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White, S. 2002. Rigor and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 287–352.Google Scholar
  44. Wilkinson, F. H., Park, K., & Atchison, M. L. 2006. Polycomb recruitment to DNA in vivo by the YY1 REPO domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 19296–19301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zadeh, L. A. 2001. Causality is undefinable—Toward a theory of hierarchical definability. Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE, 2001: 67–68.Google Scholar
  48. Zadeh, L. A. 2008. Fuzzy logic. Scholarpedia, 3(3): 1766.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, W. R. 1987. POOL: A semantic model for approximate reasoning and its application in decision support. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4): 65–78.Google Scholar
  50. Zhang, W. R. 1994. Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations. Presented at the proceedings of NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA: 305–309, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, W.-R. 1996. NPN fuzzy sets and NPN qualitative algebra: A computational framework for bipolar cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on SMC, 16: 561–574.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, W. R. 1998. (Yin)(Yang) Bipolar fuzzy sets. Presented at the proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence – Fuzz-IEEE: 835–840, Anchorage.Google Scholar
  53. Zhang, W. R. 2003a. Equilibrium relations and bipolar cognitive mapping for online analytical processing with applications in international relations and strategic decision support. IEEE Transactions on SMC Part B, 33(2): 295–307.Google Scholar
  54. Zhang, W.-R. 2003b. Equilibrium energy and stability measures for bipolar decision and global regulation. International Journal of Fuzzy System, 5(2): 114–122.Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, W. R. 2005. YinYang Bipolar lattices and L-sets for bipolar knowledge fusion, visualization, and decision. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 4(4): 621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, W. R. 2006. YinYang bipolar fuzzy sets and fuzzy equilibrium relations for bipolar clustering, optimization, and global regulation. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5(1): 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang, W.-R. 2007. YinYang bipolar universal modus ponens (BUMP)—A fundamental law of non-linear brain dynamics for emotional intelligence and mental health. Proceedings of Walter J. Freeman Workshop on Nonlinear Brain Dynamics, 89–95: 2007.Google Scholar
  58. Zhang, W. R. 2011. YinYang bipolar relativity: A unifying theory of nature, agents and causality with applications in quantum computing, cognitive informatics and life sciences. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  59. Zhang, W. R. 2012a. YinYang bipolar atom—An eastern road toward quantum gravity. Journal of Modern Physics, 3: 1261–1271.Google Scholar
  60. Zhang, W. R. 2012b. Beyond spacetime geometry—The death of philosophy and its reincarnation. Journal of Modern Physics, 3: 1272–1284.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, W. R. 2013. Bipolar quantum logic gates and quantum cellular combinatorics—A logical extension to quantum entanglement. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 3(2): 93–105.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang, W. R. 2016a. G-CPT symmetry—An equilibrium-based information-conservational multiagent cellular automata theory of quantum emergence-submergence for many-world causal analysis of quantum coherence-decoherence and collapse. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 6(2):2–97.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, W. R. 2016b. Information conservational YinYang bipolar quantum fuzzy cognitive maps – mapping business data to business intelligence. Proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence – Fuzz-IEEE, Vancouver, July 24–29.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, W. R. 2016c. A geometrical and logical unification of mind, light and matter. Proceedings of 15th IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing. Stanford University, Aug. 22–23.Google Scholar
  65. Zhang, W. R., & Chen, S. S. 2009. Equilibrium and non-equilibrium modeling of YinYang WuXing for diagnostic decision analysis in traditional Chinese medicine. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 8(3): 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, W.-R., Chen, S., & Bezdek, J. C. 1989. POOL2: A generic system for cognitive map development and decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on SMC, 19(1): 31–39.Google Scholar
  67. Zhang, W.-R., Chen, S., Wang, W., & King, R. 1992. A cognitive map based approach to the coordination of distributed cooperative agents. IEEE Transaction on SMC, 22(1): 103–114.Google Scholar
  68. Zhang, W. R., & Marchetti, F. 2015a. YinYang bipolar quantum geometry and bipolar quantum superposition Part I—A background independent geometrical and logical exposition of Dirac 3-polarizer experiment. Fractal Geometry and Nonlinear Analysis in Medicine and Biology, 1(2): 61–68.Google Scholar
  69. Zhang, W. R., & Marchetti, F. 2015b. YinYang bipolar quantum geometry and bipolar quantum superposition Part II—Toward an equilibrium-based analytical paradigm of quantum mechanics and quantum biology. Fractal Geometry and Nonlinear Analysis in Medicine and Biology, 1(2): 69–77.Google Scholar
  70. Zhang, W. R., & Marchetti, F. 2015c. A logical exposition of dirac 3-polarizer experiment and its potential impact on computational biology. Presented at the proceedings of ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM BCB): 517–518. doi:10.1145/2808719.2811438.
  71. Zhang, W.-R., Pandurangi, A., & Peace, K. 2007. YinYang dynamic neurobiological modeling and diagnostic analysis of major depressive and bipolar disorders. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(10): 1729–1739.Google Scholar
  72. Zhang, W.-R., Pandurangi, K. A., Peace, K. E., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Z. 2011. MentalSquares—A generic bipolar support vector machine for psychiatric disorder classification, diagnostic analysis and neurobiological data mining. International Journal on Data Mining and Bioinformatics, 5(5): 532–557.Google Scholar
  73. Zhang, W.-R., & Peace, K. E. 2013. Revealing the ubiquitous effects of quantum entanglement—Toward a notion of God logic. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 3(4): 143–153.Google Scholar
  74. Zhang, W.-R., & Peace, K. E. 2014. Causality is logically definable—Toward an equilibrium-based computing paradigm of quantum agent and quantum intelligence (QAQI) (Survey and research). Journal of Quantum Information Science, 4: 227–268.Google Scholar
  75. Zhang, W.-R., Wang, W., & King, R. 1994. An agent-oriented open system shell for distributed decision process modeling. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4(2): 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang, W.-R., & Zhang, L. 2004. YinYang bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic. Information Sciences, 165(3–4): 265–287.Google Scholar
  77. Zhang, W. R., Zhang, H. J., Shi, Y., & Chen, S. S. 2009. Bipolar linear algebra and YinYang-N-element cellular networks for equilibrium-based biosystem simulation and regulation. Journal of Biological Systems, 17(4): 547–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhou, Q., & Yik, J. H. N. 2006. The Yin and Yang of P-TEFb regulation: Implications for human immunodeficiency virus gene expression and global control of cell growth and differentiation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 70(3): 646–659.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public HealthGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  3. 3.Department of Information SystemsGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations