Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 367–397 | Cite as

Rethinking the government as innovator: Evidence from Asian firms

Article

Abstract

Can government ownership of a firm spur innovation? While a robust body of empirical and theoretical work suggests that government ownership suppresses innovation, the increasing global competitiveness of government-owned firms coupled with the transition of these firms’ competitive advantage from low-cost labor-focused to innovation-focused suggests we reconsider the relationship between government ownership and innovation. This paper develops and tests a theory that a minority level of government ownership has a positive influence on firm-level innovation, by substituting for a better-developed financial market and alleviating financial constraints. By combining the incentives and monitoring benefits of private ownership with the more “patient” shareholders of and protection from failure by the state, minority government ownership can provide an environment for firms to pursue otherwise risky innovative projects. The testing of this theory makes use of a large sample of Asian firms, and the results with respect to matched minority government-owned and privately held firms show that minority government ownership increases the likelihood of innovation among financially constrained firms; moreover, it especially increases the likelihood of process innovation (as opposed to product innovation), which is traditionally difficult to finance. The study’s results—which stand to benefit firms and governments worldwide—remain robust to alternative mechanisms and controls, as well as to a variety of sensitivity tests.

Keywords

Government ownership Innovation Financing 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. 2006. Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1): 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessi, L. D. 1973. Private property and dispersion of ownership in large corporations. Journal of Finance, 28(4): 839–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., & Stamm, A. 2008. Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36(2): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibugi, D., & Sirilli, G. 2001. The direct measurement of technological innovation in business. Presented at the “Innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators” Conference held at Sophia Antipolis.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors: 609–626. Cambridge: NBER, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. 2011. Small vs. young firms across the world: Contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. Policy Research Working paper no. WPS 5631. Washington DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai, C.-E., Lu, J., & Tao, Z. 2009. How does privatization work in China?. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(3): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartel, A. P., & Harrison, A. E. 2005. Ownership versus environment: Disentangling the sources of public-sector inefficiency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1): 135–147.Google Scholar
  9. Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. 2004. Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(2): 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. 2000. A new database on the structure and development of the financial sector. World Bank Economic Review, 14(3): 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. 1931. The modem corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Bremmer, I. 2010. The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations?. European View, 9(2): 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009a. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carney, M., Shapiro, D., & Tang, Y. 2009b. Business group performance in China: Ownership and temporal considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(2): 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, V. Z., Li, J., Shapiro, D. M., & Zhang, X. 2014. Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. 2011. Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3): 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi, S. B, Byung Il P, & Paul H. 2012. “Does ownership structure matter for firm technological innovation performance? The case of Korean firms.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3): 267–288.Google Scholar
  18. Chong, A., & López-de-Silanes, F. 2005. Privatization in Latin America: Myths and reality. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christiansen, H. 2011. The size and composition of the SOE sector in OECD countries. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers. doi:10.1787/5kg54cwps0s3-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 2: 1059–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 925–951.Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER working paper no. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Collins, P. D., Hage, J., & Hull, F. M. 1988. Organizational and technological predictors of change in automaticity. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 512–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. 1994. A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3): 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gedajlovic, E. R., & Shapiro, D. M. 1998. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6): 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta, N. 2005. Partial privatization and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 60(2): 987–1015.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, B. H. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, B. H. 2008. The financing of innovation. In S. Shane (Ed.). The handbook of technology and innovation management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4): 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henisz, W. J. 2000. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Essen, M., & van Oosterhout, J. 2009. Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 481–512.Google Scholar
  34. Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. 2009. A great wall of patents: What is behind China’s recent patent explosion?. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1): 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. 2005. Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth?: Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34(9): 1385–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Inoue, C., Lazzarini, S., & Musacchio, A. 2013. Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of equity purchases by the state. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1775–1801.Google Scholar
  37. Jefferson, G. H., & Su, J. 2006. Privatization and restructuring in China: Evidence from shareholding ownership, 1995–2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(1): 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1): 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2005. Business Groups and risk sharing around the world. Journal of Business, 78(1): 301–340.Google Scholar
  40. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites?. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2): 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. 2008. Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3): 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kole, S. R., & Mulherin, J. H. 1997. The government as a shareholder: A case from the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 40(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. 2003. Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41: 1095–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471–517.Google Scholar
  45. Larner, R. J. 1966. Ownership and control in the 200 largest non-financial corporations, 1929 and 1963. American Economic Review, 56(4): 777–787.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, M., Son, B., & Om, K. 1996. Evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea. Research Policy, 25(5): 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leiponen, A., & Poczter, S. 2014. Relational financing and innovation in emerging economies. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  48. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3): 783–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li, S., & Nair, A. 2009. Asian corporate governance or corporate governance in Asia?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4): 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. 2001. From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2): 321–389.Google Scholar
  51. Michie, J. 1998. Introduction. The internationalisation of the innovation process. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3): 261–277.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2009. Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 802–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mishkin, F. S. 1997. Understanding financial crises: A developing country perspective. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  54. Nelson, R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67: 297–306.Google Scholar
  55. OECD. 2005. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  56. Poczter, S., 2016. Can monitoring improve the performance of state-owned firms? Evidence from privatization in a large emerging market. Industrial and Corporate Change, dtv056.Google Scholar
  57. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. 1998. Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88(3): 559–586.Google Scholar
  58. Ryan, H. E., Jr., & Wiggins, R. A., III. 2002. The interactions between R&D investment decisions and compensation policy. Financial Management, 31: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sakakibara, M., & Cho, D. S. 2002. Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: A comparison of industrial policy. Research Policy, 31(5): 673–692.Google Scholar
  60. Shirley, M., & Walsh, P. 2001. Public vs. private ownership: The current state of the debate. Policy Research Working paper no. WPS 2420, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  61. Shleifer, A. 1998. State versus private ownership. NBER Working paper no. 6665, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  62. Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. 2002. How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1–2): 1–27.Google Scholar
  63. Tan, J., & Zeng, Y. 2009. A stage-dependent model of resource utilization, strategic flexibility, and implications for performance over time: Empirical evidence from a transitional environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vicente-Lorente, J. D. 2001. Specificity and opacity as resource‐based determinants of capital structure: Evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. 1991. Economic perspectives on privatization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2): 111–132.Google Scholar
  66. Wallsten, S. J. 2000. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1): 82–100.Google Scholar
  67. Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3): 421–458.Google Scholar
  68. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  70. Yarrow, G., King, M., Mairesse, J., & Melitz, J. 1986. Privatization in theory and practice. Economic Policy: 324–377.Google Scholar
  71. Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183–206.Google Scholar
  72. Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2007. Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8): 1551–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yusuf, S. (Ed.). 2003. Innovative East Asia: The future of growth. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  74. Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8): 1185–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and ManagementCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations