Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 497–522 | Cite as

Business and regulators partnerships: Government transformational leadership for constructive conflict management

Article

Abstract

Regulations are often thought to be impediments to collaboration between governments and businesses; however, governments and businesses are increasingly forming partnerships to help them negotiate regulation issues and more broadly work together. This study argues that governments, by exercising transformational leadership, lay the foundation for the cooperative approach, in contrast to the competitive and avoiding approaches, to conflict management that in turn results in effective partnerships. Findings from 146 pairs of government regulators and business support the hypothesis, though the evidence for the ineffectiveness of avoiding conflict was not statistically significant. Specifically, structural equation analysis results support the model that transformational leadership fosters cooperative approach to conflict and reduces competitive conflict management that in turn result in respectful, effective partnerships that develop industries.

Keywords

Transformational leadership Cooperative and competitive approaches to conflict Respect Industry development Partnership effectiveness 

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. 2008. Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging market. Journal of World Business, 43: 385–399.Google Scholar
  2. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. 2000. Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in self-managing work teams. Personnel Psychology, 53: 625–642.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, J. R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408–437.Google Scholar
  4. Barker, J. R., Tjosvold, D., & Andrews, I. R. 1988. Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 167–178.Google Scholar
  5. Barling, J., Weber, J., & Kelloway, E. K. 1996. Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 827–832.Google Scholar
  6. Bass, B. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bass, B., Avolio, B., Jung, D., & Berson, Y. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 207–218.Google Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. 2010. Testing model nesting and equivalence. Psychological Methods, 15(2): 111–123.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, W. D. 1984. An alternative to the capture theory of regulation: The case of state public utility commissions. American Journal of Political Science, 28: 524–558.Google Scholar
  10. Bollen, K. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Bonardi, J. P., Hillman, A., & Keim, G. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implication for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 397–413.Google Scholar
  12. Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1: 185–216.Google Scholar
  13. Brooke, P. P., Jr., Russell, D., & Price, J. 1988. Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 139–145.Google Scholar
  14. Burke, C., Stagl, K., Klein, C., Goodwin, G., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. 2006. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3): 288–307.Google Scholar
  15. Buvik, A., & John, G. 2000. When does vertical coordination improve industrial purchasing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 64: 52–64.Google Scholar
  16. CBS News. 2011. Obama: White House, business must work together. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/02/07/politics/main7326285.shtml, accessed Apr. 9, 2011.
  17. Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. 2012. Shared rewards and goal interdependence for psychological safety among departments in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 433–452.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. 2005. Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2): 277–300.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, Y. F. N., Tjosvold, D., & Peng, A. C. 2007. Conflict and harmony in foreign-Sino ventures in China. In G. B. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.). New multinational leadership sharing. LMX leadership: The series: 43–63. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  20. Committee on Capital Markets Regulation (CCMR). 2009. The global financial crisis—A plan for regulatory reform. http://www.capmktsreg.org/pdfs/TGFC-CCMR_Report_(5-26-09).pdf, accessed Apr. 9, 2011.
  21. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. 1987. Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4): 637–647.Google Scholar
  22. Cowen, T. 2008. Too few regulations? No, just ineffective ones. New York Times: Sept. 14. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/business/14view.html, accessed Apr. 9, 2011.
  23. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Conway, N. 2004. The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange. In J. A. M. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.). The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives: 5–28. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Day, D., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. 2006. Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3): 211–216.Google Scholar
  25. De Dreu, C. 2007. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3): 628–638.Google Scholar
  26. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (Eds.). 2008. The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (Eds.). 1997. Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. DeGroot, T., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. C. 2000. A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17: 356–371.Google Scholar
  29. Deutsch, M. 1973. The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Deutsch, M. 1980. Fifty years of conflict. In L. Festinger (Ed.). Retrospections on social psychology: 46–77. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Deutsch, M. 1990. Sixty years of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(3): 237–263.Google Scholar
  32. Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. 2004. Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17: 177–193.Google Scholar
  33. Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. 1999. Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 389–402.Google Scholar
  34. Dougherty, S. M., & McGuckin, R. H. 2008. The effects of federalism on productivity in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4: 39–61.Google Scholar
  35. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 735–744.Google Scholar
  36. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. I. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737–770.Google Scholar
  37. Etzioni, A. 2009. The capture theory of regulations—Revisited. Society, 46: 319–323.Google Scholar
  38. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39–50.Google Scholar
  39. Frazier, G. L., Spekman, R. E., & O’Neal, C. R. 1988. Just-in-time exchange relationships in industrial markets. Journal of Marketing, 52: 52–67.Google Scholar
  40. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Kumar, N. 2006. Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 519–543.Google Scholar
  41. Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. 1998. Measures of performance in UK international alliances. Organization Studies, 19(1): 89–118.Google Scholar
  42. Hanlon, S. C., Meyer, D. C., & Taylor, R. R. 1994. Consequences of gainshairing: A field experiment revisited. Group and Organizational Management, 19: 87–111.Google Scholar
  43. Hayduk, L. A. 1987. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. He, Y., & Tian, Z. 2008. Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 4: 367–391.Google Scholar
  45. Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., & Tjosvold, D. 2009. Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organization Behavior, 30: 41–65.Google Scholar
  46. Hofstede, G. 1993. Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7: 81–94.Google Scholar
  47. House, R. J. 1976. A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.). Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hui, C., Law, K. S., Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. 2008. The role of co-operation and competition on leader–member exchange and extra-role performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource, 46(2): 133–152.Google Scholar
  49. Hui, C., Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. 2007. Turnover intention and performance in china: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 735–751.Google Scholar
  50. Intriligator, M. D., Braguinsky, S., Bowen, J. R., Tullock, G., & Root, H. L. 1999. Role of market institutions in Pacific Rim development and transition. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1: 109–137.Google Scholar
  51. Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256–282.Google Scholar
  52. Jehn, K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 530–557.Google Scholar
  53. Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. 2003. Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24: 187–242.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. 2000. Constructive controversy. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman & E. C. Marcus (Eds.). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice: 65–85. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1996. LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, 2nd ed. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  56. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217–237.Google Scholar
  57. Kaplan, D. 2009. Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F. Y., & Westwood, R. I. 1991. Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behaviour: Cultural and psychological influences. Organization Studies, 12: 365–386.Google Scholar
  59. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2003. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 29: 297–317.Google Scholar
  60. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. 1987. The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  61. Krug, B., & Hendrischke, H. 2008. Framing china: Transformation and institutional change through co-evolution. Management and Organization Review, 4: 81–101.Google Scholar
  62. Krug, B., & Hendrischke, H. 2012. Market design in Chinese market places. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 525–546.Google Scholar
  63. Lam, L. W., Huang, X., & Lau, D. C. 2012. Leadership research in Asia: Taking the road less traveled? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 195–204.Google Scholar
  64. Langfred, C. W. 2007. The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task independence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 885–900.Google Scholar
  65. Leung, K. 1996. The role of harmony in conflict avoidance. Paper presented at the Korean Psychological Association 50th Anniversary Conference, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  66. Leung, K. 1997. Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.). New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology: 640–675. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  67. Leung, K., Koch, P. T., & Lu, L. 2002. A dualistic model of harmony and is implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 201–220.Google Scholar
  68. Liden, R. C. 2012. Leadership research in Asia: A brief assessment and suggestions for the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 205–212.Google Scholar
  69. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. 2004. Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4): 610–621.Google Scholar
  70. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Cai, L. 2006. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11: 19–35.Google Scholar
  71. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Hoffman, J. 1998. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research Annual Meeting, Park City, Utah, June.Google Scholar
  72. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1): 83–104.Google Scholar
  73. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. 1981. Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Mathieu, J. E., & Farr, J. L. 1991. Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 127–133.Google Scholar
  75. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 20–39.Google Scholar
  76. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. L. 1985. Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3): 277–282.Google Scholar
  77. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. 1983. Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1): 45–55.Google Scholar
  78. Ohbuchi, K., & Atsumi, E. 2010. Avoidance brings Japanese employees what they care about in conflict management: Its functionality and “good member” image. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3: 117–129.Google Scholar
  79. Pagliero, M. 2011. What is the objective of professional licensing? Evidence from the US market for lawyers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29: 473–483.Google Scholar
  80. Pearce, R. J. 1997. Towards understanding joint venture performance and survival: A bargaining and influence approach to transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 22: 203–235.Google Scholar
  81. Pearce, R. J. 2001. Looking inside the joint venture to help understand the link between inter-parent cooperation and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4): 557–582.Google Scholar
  82. Peterson, R., & Nemeth, C. 1996. Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22: 14–23.Google Scholar
  83. Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C., & Williams, E. 1999. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25(6): 897–933.Google Scholar
  84. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. 1996. Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22: 259–298.Google Scholar
  85. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903.Google Scholar
  86. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 4: 1–44.Google Scholar
  87. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  88. Pritchard, D. 1992. Organizational productivity. In D. M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 443–471. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  89. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. 2007. Equivalent structural equation models: A challenge and responsibility. Structural Equation Modeling, 14: 695–700.Google Scholar
  90. Rea, D. G., Brooks, H., Burger, R. M., & LaScala, R. 1997. The semiconductor industry: Model for industry/university/government cooperation. Research Technology Management, 40(4): 46–54.Google Scholar
  91. Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. 2001. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2): 1–18.Google Scholar
  92. Ring, P. S., Bigley, G. A., D’Aunno, T., & Khanna, T. 2005. Perspectives on how governments matter. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 308–320.Google Scholar
  93. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. 1989. Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 745–772.Google Scholar
  94. Shaffer, B. 1995. Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21: 495–514.Google Scholar
  95. Shanghai Statistical Bureau. 2010. Shanghai statistical yearbook 2010. Shanghai: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  96. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. 2011. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from china. Journal of Marketing, 75: 1–15.Google Scholar
  97. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehesiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662–673.Google Scholar
  98. Somech, A., Desivilva, H. S., & Lidogoster, H. 2009. Team conflict management and team effectiveness: The effects of task interdependence and team identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 359–378.Google Scholar
  99. Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. 1995. The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.). International review of industrial and organizational psychology: 249–274. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  100. Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. 2005. Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the united states and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 205–227.Google Scholar
  101. Stigler, G. J. 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1): 3–21.Google Scholar
  102. Tang, J. 1999. Business as usual: The dynamics of government-business relations in the Hong Kong special administrative region. Journal of Contemporary China, 8: 275–295.Google Scholar
  103. Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. 2009. A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 3: 170–205.Google Scholar
  104. Thomas, C. W., Soule, A. B., & Davis, T. B. 2010. Special interest capture of regulatory agencies: A ten-year analysis of voting behavior on regional fishery management councils. Policy Studies Journal, 38: 447–464.Google Scholar
  105. Tjosvold, D. 1985. Power and social context in superior–subordinate interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35: 281–293.Google Scholar
  106. Tjosvold, D. 1989. Interdependence and power between managers and workers: A study of the leader relationship. Journal of Management, 15: 49–62.Google Scholar
  107. Tjosvold, D. 1993. Prevalence of cooperation and competition: Evidence from diverse organizations. Psychological Reports, 72(1): 210.Google Scholar
  108. Tjosvold, D. 1998. Employee involvement in support of corporate values in successful organizations: Groups, cooperative interaction, and influence. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 11: 35–46.Google Scholar
  109. Tjosvold, D. 2008a. The conflict-positive organization: It depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1): 19–28.Google Scholar
  110. Tjosvold, D. 2008b. Controversy for management education: Developing committed, open-minded researchers. Exemplary contributions. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7: 73–85.Google Scholar
  111. Tjosvold, D., Chen, Y. F., & Su, F. 2011. Zài chōng tū zhōng huà dí wèi yǒu [Making conflict positive]. Beijing: China Machine Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  112. Tjosvold, D., & Huston, T. L. 1978. Social face and resistance to compromise in bargaining. Journal of Social Psychology, 104: 57–68.Google Scholar
  113. Tjosvold, D., Law, K. S., & Sun, H. 2006. Conflict in Chinese teams: Conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review, 2: 231–252.Google Scholar
  114. Tjosvold, D., Peng, A. C., Chen, Y. F., & Su, F. 2008. Business and government interdependence in china: Cooperative goals to develop business and industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2): 225–249.Google Scholar
  115. Tjosvold, D., Poon, M., & Yu, Z. Y. 2005. Team effectiveness in china: Cooperative conflict for relationship building. Human Relations, 58: 341–367.Google Scholar
  116. Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. 2000. Social face in conflict among Chinese: Effects of affronts to person and position. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4: 259–271.Google Scholar
  117. Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. 2002. Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13: 142–164.Google Scholar
  118. Tjosvold, D., Wu, P., & Chen, Y. F. 2010. The effects of collectivist and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making: An experiment in china. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11): 2904–2926.Google Scholar
  119. Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. 2007. Group risk taking: The constructive role of controversy in china. Group & Organization Management, 32(6): 653–674.Google Scholar
  120. Tse, D. K., Francis, J., & Walls, J. 1994. Cultural differences in conducting intra- and inter-cultural negotiations: A Sino-Canadian comparison. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 537–555.Google Scholar
  121. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4): 349–361.Google Scholar
  122. Ullman, J., & Bentler, P. M. 2003. Structural equation modeling. In J. A. Schinka, W. F. Velicer & I. B. Weiner (Eds.). Handbook of psychology, research methods in psychology, vol. 2: 607–631. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  123. Wang, H., Kenneth, S. L., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D. X., & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader–member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 420–432.Google Scholar
  124. Williams, M. 2001. In whom we trust: Group membership for an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26: 377–396.Google Scholar
  125. Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63: 269–296.Google Scholar
  126. Wong, A. S. H., Tjosvold, D., & Chen, Y. F. 2005. Conflict management for justice, and innovation and strategic advantage in organizational partnerships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  127. Wong, A. S. H., Tjosvold, D., & Su, F. 2007. Social face for innovation in strategic alliances in china: The mediating roles of resource exchange and reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 961–978.Google Scholar
  128. Zhang, X. A., Cao, Q., & Tjosvold, D. 2011. Linking transformational leadership and team performance: A conflict management approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7): 1586–1611.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementLingnan UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.School of International and Public AffairsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations