The impact of internationalization on performance and innovation: The moderating effects of ownership concentration
- 1.6k Downloads
Researchers in international business have long been interested in understanding the impact of internationalization on performance and innovation. However, prior studies of this research stream offer mixed results. This study contributes to this research stream by employing agency theory to investigate how ownership concentration affects the performance and innovation implications of internationalization. Specifically, we examine two primary effects of ownership concentration: the incentive alignment effect, proxied by the controlling shareholder’s cash flow rights, and the entrenchment effect, proxied by the divergence between control rights and cash flow rights of the controlling shareholder. Based on a sample of Taiwan’s publicly listed firms, we find that the incentive alignment effect moderates the relation between internationalization and performance and innovation positively and the entrenchment effect moderates the relation negatively. These findings shed light on the mixed results of the literature. In addition, most countries outside the United States and the United Kingdom have high ownership concentration; therefore, our results may be generalizable to other settings, providing insight into the role of corporate governance in internationalization.
KeywordsOwnership concentration Internationalization Performance Innovation Taiwan
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. 2005. Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 701–728.Google Scholar
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, J. 1992. The theory of technological competence and its application to international production. In D. G. McFetridge (Ed.). Foreign investment, technology and economy growth: 33–67. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, J. 1993. The internationalization of technological activity and its implications for competitiveness. In O. Granstrand, L. Hakanson & S. Sjolander (Eds.). Technology management and international business: 137–162. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chen, V. Z., Li, J., & Shapiro, D. M. 2010. Are OECD-prescribed “good corporate governance practices” really good in an emerging economy?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-010-9206-8.
- Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. 1994. A mid-term theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20(2): 297–326.Google Scholar
- Hitt, M. A., & Keats, B. W. 1992. Strategic leadership and restructuring: A reciprocal interdependence. In R. L. Phillips & J. G. Hunt (Eds.). Strategic leadership: A multi-organizational perspective: 45–61. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
- Hymer, S. H. 1976. A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2): 323–329.Google Scholar
- Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2010. Principal-principal conflicts during crisis. Asia pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9186-8.
- Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Qian, G. 1997. Assessing product-market diversification of US firms. Management International Review, 37(2): 127–149.Google Scholar
- Ramaswamy, K. 1995. Multinationality, configuration, and performance: A study of MNEs in the US drug and pharmaceutical sector. Journal of International Management, 1(2): 231–253.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of international markets. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Ruigrok, W., & Wagner, H. 2003. Internationalization and performance: An organizational learning perspective. Management International Review, 43(1): 63–83.Google Scholar
- Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Liu, G. S. 2010. Corporate governance failure and contingent political resource in transition economies: A longitudinal case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9184-x.
- Tan, D., & Meyer, K. E. 2010. Business groups’ outward FDI: A managerial resources perspective. Journal of International Management, (in press).Google Scholar