Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 367–385 | Cite as

The development of entrepreneurship in Chinese communities: An organizational symbiosis perspective

  • Ji LiEmail author
  • Michael N. Young
  • Guiyao Tang
Article

Abstract

Why has the rate of entrepreneurship recently gone down in Singapore? Why is entrepreneurship in Southern China (e.g., Guangdong or Fujian provinces) relatively higher than in the rest of China? Why is corruption rampant in some Chinese business communities but virtually nonexistent in others? Although we often speak of “Chinese entrepreneurship” as a monolithic entity, the fact is that there are many variants of Chinese entrepreneurship and these variants continue to rapidly evolve and take on new forms. Yet mainstream management or organizational theories have been at a loss to explain these high rates of variation and evolution. To shed light on these issues, we introduce the idea of symbiosis from biology and adapt it to the development of entrepreneurship in Chinese ethnic communities. Symbiosis is the science of how different organisms coexist with each other in a self-sustaining system. Using this approach, we develop six propositions to explain what types of entrepreneurship are likely to evolve in different Chinese ethnic communities and how this process of evolution is likely to proceed. The implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Keywords

Symbiosis Entrepreneurship Chinese management 

References

  1. Abmadijian, V., & Paracer, S. 1986. Symbiosis: An introduction to biological associations. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. 2010. Entrepreneurial capitalism in East Asia: How history matters. In H. Landström & F. Lohrke (Eds.). The historical foundations of entrepreneurship research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. 2004. Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. L. 1999. The accidental entrepreneur, Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum & B. Mckelvey (Eds.). Variations in organization science, in honor of Donald T. Campbell: 19–33. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, J. 2000. The Chinese. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1988. The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in the Chinese economic reforms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boucher, D. H. 1985. The biology of mutualism: Ecology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. 2008. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chau, C. H. 2006. China’s ‘iron triangle’ of corruption: Shanghai pension scandal exemplifies the collusion of ruling, business and intellectual elite that is holding up legal reform. Strait Times, Singapore, November 4.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, M.-J. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers world wide. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environments: 3–21. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, A. E. 1994. Symbiotic interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9134-7.
  15. Gause, G. F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu, M., & Tse, E. 2010. Building innovative organizations in China: The “execution+” organization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27. doi: 10.1007/s10490-008-9115-2.
  17. Haley, G. T., Tan, C. T., & Haley, U. C. V. 1998. The new Asian emperors: The overseas Chinese, their strategies and competitive advantages. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  18. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M. W., et al. 1999. Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In W. Mobley, J. Gessner & V. Arnold (Eds.). Advances in global leadership, Vol. 1: 171–234. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, G. 1966. Southeast Asia—Race, culture and nation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jenner, W. J. F. 1992. The tyranny of history: The roots of China’s crisis. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, G. E. 2003. Guangdong: From past to present and future. In J. Y. S. Cheng (Ed.). Guangdong, preparing for the WTO challenge: 327–358. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, T. Y., & Low, L. 1990. Local entrepreneurship in Singapore, private and state: 176–222. Singapore: Times Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Li, J. 2007. Cross-cultural research on legitimated leadership behaviors in Chinese societies, findings, explanations and implications. In S. Seshagiri & J. R. Gajendra (Eds.). Effective leadership, lessons in a cross-cultural context: 102–118. India: The Icfai University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Li, J., Fu, P. P., Liu, Z. Q., & Chen, Y. Y. 2008. The malleability of culture and leadership style in East Asia: A perspective of institutional symbiosis. Journal of Organization and Management Development, 1(1): 59–84.Google Scholar
  28. Li, J., & Karakowsky, L. 2002. Cultural malleability in an East Asian context: An illustration of the relationship between government policy, national culture and firm behavior. Administration and Society, 34: 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lianhe, Z. 1997. Singaporeans much learn from people in Hong Kong. United Morning Time, July 8: 2.Google Scholar
  30. Margulis, L. 1981. Symbiosis and cell evolution. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  31. Margulis, L. 1984. Early life. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  32. Margulis, L., & Bermudes, D. 1985. Symbiosis as a mechanism of evolution: Status of cell systiosis theory. Symbiosis, 1(2): 101–124.Google Scholar
  33. Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. 1995. What is life?. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. 2002. Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: basic books.Google Scholar
  35. Nelson, R. E. 1990. Is there strategy in Brazil?. Business Horizons, 33: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norhashim, M., & Aziz, K. 2005. Smart partnership or cronyism? A Malaysian perspective. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 25(8): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Oliver, C. 1992. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13: 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan, L. 1990. Sons of the yellow emperor: The story of the overseas Chinese. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  40. Pollin, R. 2007. Resurrection of the rentier. New Left Review, 46: 140–153.Google Scholar
  41. Redding, S. G. 1986. Entrepreneurship in Asia. Euro-Asia Business Review, 5(4): 23–27.Google Scholar
  42. Sapp, J. 1994. Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Saywell, T. 2002. Singapore adventure story. Far Eastern Economic Review, 165(41): 62–63.Google Scholar
  44. Scott, R. 1994. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Selmer, J. 1997. Vikings & dragons, Swedish management in Southeast Asia. Hong Kong: Signal Printing Company.Google Scholar
  46. Simon, H. A. 1992. Altruism and economics. Eastern Economic Journal, 18: 73–83.Google Scholar
  47. Studwell, J. 2007. Asian godfathers. New York: Atlantic Monthly.Google Scholar
  48. Tan, C. 1997. Local firms are not too keen to go regional. The Business Times, January 7: 2.Google Scholar
  49. van Witteloostuijn, A. 2000. Organizational ecology has a bright future. Organization Studies, 21(2): 5–14.Google Scholar
  50. Veblen, T. 1934. Essays on our changing order. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  51. Veblen, T. 1953. The theory of the leisure class. New York: Mentor Book.Google Scholar
  52. Weber, M. 1951. The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: The McMillan Company.Google Scholar
  53. Weidenbaum, M., & Hughes, S. 1996. The bamboo network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new economic superpower. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Yang, K. S. 1986 Chinese personality and its change. In M. H. Bond (Ed.). The psychology of the Chinese people: 106–170. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yeo, H. P. 1997. Fit of culture in Asian emerging markets: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturing firms. Research paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongChina

Personalised recommendations