Reexamining some management lessons from military history

  • David AhlstromEmail author
  • David Lamond
  • Zhujun Ding


Military history has provided a number of useful metaphors for management, such as positioning, blue ocean strategy, defensible perimeters, and fighting the last war, among others. In spite of this rich tradition and the detailed writings on the military, management research has actually made a rather truncated use of military history. This includes the selective use of military metaphors, and a limited number of individual and comparative case studies on diplomatic and military scenarios. It is argued that much more can be learned from military history, though certain well-known metaphors and lessons drawn from major events do not convey what military history actually teaches about those events. To learn from military history, historical events must be studied carefully so proper lessons can be derived from them. This paper examines two major episodes in 20th century military history from World War I and the subsequent interwar period, and how themes derived from these events and used in the management field are not consistent with what the historical record teaches about them. We suggest that a fuller and more careful rendering of historical events and their lessons would be potentially beneficial to management research, and suggest ways in which they can be researched.


History Organizational learning World War I Interwar period Military 



The authors thank Professor Mike Peng, Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management, for his many thoughts and suggestions on this paper. His insights on the connection between management and the armed services as well as his knowledge of history provided much inspiration for this work.


  1. Ahlstrom, D. 1996. Neglecting a useful technology: The case of dietary protein restriction in chronic renal failure. PhD dissertation, New York University, Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. 2009. Groupthink and France’s defeat in the 1940 campaign. Journal of Management History, 15(2): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertini, L. 1952. The origins of the war of 1914, 3 Vols. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. 1999. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Allison, G. T., Carnesale, A., & Nye, J. S. (Eds.). 1985. Hawks, doves and owls: An agenda for avoiding nuclear war. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Barnard, C. I. 1938. Functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beaufre, A. 1968. 1940, the fall of France. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  9. Beringer, R. E., Hattaway, H., Jones, A., & Still, W. N. 1991. Why the South lost the Civil War. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blight, D. W. 2002. Race and reunion: The Civil War in American memory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bloch, M. 1944. Strange defeat. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Boar, B. 1995. Sun Tzu and Machiavelli on strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 16: 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bond, B., & Alexander, M. 1986. Liddell Hart and De Gaulle: The doctrines of limited liability and mobile defense. In P. Paret (Ed.). Makers of modern strategy from Machiavelli to the nuclear age: 598–623. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  14. Boot, M. 2006. War made new. New York: Gotham.Google Scholar
  15. Brandt, L., & Rawski, T. G. (Eds.). 2008. China’s great economic transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brodie, B. 1931–1978. Bernard Brodie papers. Los Angeles: UCLA Research Library, Box 2.Google Scholar
  17. Brodie, B. 1954. Unlimited weapons and limited war. The Reporter, 2(9): l8–21.Google Scholar
  18. Brodie, B. 1973. War and politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Cairns, J. 1974. Some recent historians and the “strange defeat” of 1940. The Journal of Modern History, 46: 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carroll, G., & Hannan, M. T. 2000. The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Chen, M., & Miller, D. 1994. Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy valence framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clausewitz, C. V. 2004. On war. J. J. Graham (Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  23. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. 2005. Managing organizations: An introduction to theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Clemons, E. K., & Santamaria, J. A. 2002. Maneuver warfare: Can modern military strategy lead you to victory?. Harvard Business Review, 80: 56–65.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, E. A., & Gooch, J. 1990. Military misfortunes: The anatomy of failure in war. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, W. I. 1995. The Cambridge history of American foreign relations: Volume 4, America in the age of Soviet power, 1945–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Corum, J. S. 1994. The roots of Blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German military reform. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  28. Craig, G. A. 1964. The politics of the Prussian army: 1640–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dixon, N. F. 1994. On the psychology of military incompetence, Updated ed. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  32. Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. Jr. 2001. Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey, 5th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Doughty, R. A. 1985. The seeds of disaster, the development of French army doctrine, 1919–1939. New York: Archon.Google Scholar
  34. Doughty, R. A. 1988. The French armed forces, 1918–1940. In A. R. Millett & W. Murray (Eds.). Military effectiveness, Volume II: The interwar period: 39–69. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Doughty, R. A. 1990. The breaking point—Sedan and the fall of France 1940. New York: Archon.Google Scholar
  36. Eicher, D. J. 1997. The Civil War in books. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, R. J. 1999. In defense of history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  38. Evans, R. J. 2001. Lying about Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving trial. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Farrar-Hockley, A. H. 1964. The Somme. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  40. Fayol, H. 1988. General and industrial management, Revised ed. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  41. Feld, M. D. 1959. Information and authority: The structure of military organization. American Sociological Review, 24: 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ferguson, N. 2006. The war of the world: Twentieth-century conflict and the descent of the West. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Finkelstein, S. 2003. Why smart executives fail: And what you can learn from their mistakes. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
  44. Gallagher, G. W., & Nolan, A. T. (Eds.). 2000. The myth of the lost cause and Civil War history. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Géraud, A. 1944. Les fossoyeurs, 2 Vols. The gravediggers of France: Gamelin, Daladier, Reynaud, Pétain and Laval: Military defeat, armistice, counterrevolution (Trans.). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  46. Geyer, M. 1986. German strategy in the age of machine warfare, 1914–1945. In P. Paret (Ed.). Makers of modern strategy from Machiavelli to the nuclear age: 527–597. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  47. Gilbert, M. 1994. First World War. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  48. Gildea, R. 2004. Marianne in chains: Daily life in the heart of France during the German occupation. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  49. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. 2009. Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26: 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Graff, D., & Higham, R. (Eds.). 2002. A military history of China. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  51. Halliday, F. 2005. The Middle East in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hanson, V. D. 2002. Carnage and culture: Landmark battles in the rise of Western power. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  55. Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. 2006. Organizational behavior: A strategic approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Horne, A. 1979. To lose a battle—France 1940. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Horne, A. 1984. The French army and politics 1870–1970. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. House, R. J. 1996. Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7: 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Howard, M. 1964. Lest we forget. Encounter, January: 61–67.Google Scholar
  60. Hsiung, J. C. & Levine, S. I. (Eds.). 1992. China’s bitter victory: The war with Japan, 1937–1945. London: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  61. Hughes, J. M. 2006. To the Maginot line: The politics of French military preparation in the 1920s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Jackson, J. 2003. The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Keegan, J. 1999. The First World War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  64. Keynes, J. M. 1920. The economic consequences of the peace. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  65. Lamond, D. A. 2006. Matters for judgment: Some thoughts on method in management history. Journal of Management History, 12: 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lewis, B. 2003. The Middle East. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  67. Lo, V. H. Y., Ho, C. O., & Sculli, D. 1998. The strategic insights of Sun Tzu and quality management. The TQM Magazine, 10: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lupfer, T. 1981. The dynamics of doctrine: The changes in German tactical doctrine during the First World War. Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  69. Mains, S., & Geller, L. W. 2008. Freeing ideas from their silos. S+B Leading Ideas Online, 2/12/08., Accessed June 5, 2009.
  70. May, E. R. 2000. Strange victory: Hitler’s conquest of France. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  71. McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  72. Meyer, T. H. (Ed.). 1997. Light for the new millennium: Rudolf Steiner’s association with Helmuth and Eliza Von Moltke: Letters, documents and after-death communications (Trans.). London: Steiner.Google Scholar
  73. Michael, J. H. 1995. America in the world: The historiography of US foreign relations since 1941. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Mintzberg, H. 1987. Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(4): 66–75.Google Scholar
  75. Mintzberg, H. 1994. The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mintzberg, H. 2008. Tracking strategies: Towards a general theory of strategy formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., & Ahlstrand, B. 1998. Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  78. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J., & Ghoshal, S. 2003. The strategy process: Concepts, contexts and cases, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  79. Mosier, J. 2001. The myth of the Great War: A new military history of World War I. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  80. Muller, R. R. 1996. Close air support: The German, British, and American experiences, 1918–1941. In W. Murray & A. R. Millett (Eds.). Military innovation in the interwar period: 144–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Murray, M., & Millett, A. R. 2001. A war to be won: Fighting the Second World War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Murray, M., & Sinnreich, R. H. 2006. The past as prologue: The importance of history to the military profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Murray, W. 1981. The German response to victory in Poland: A case study in professionalism. Armed Forces & Society, 7: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Murray, W. 1986. Clausewitz: Some thoughts on what the Germans got right. In M. I. Handel (Ed.). Clausewitz and modern strategy: 267–286. London: Cass.Google Scholar
  85. Murray, W. 1996. Armored warfare: The British, French, and German experiences. In W. Murray & A. R. Millett (Eds.). Military innovation in the interwar period: 6–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Murray, W. 2006. Thoughts on military history and the profession of arms. In W. Murray & R. H. Sinnreich (Eds.). The past as prologue: The importance of history to the military profession: 78–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Murray, W., & Millett, A. R. (Eds.). 1996. Military innovation in the interwar period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Nicolson, C. 2001. The Longman companion to the First World War: Europe 1914–1918. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  89. Peng, M. W. 2009. Global strategy. 2nd ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  90. Persico, J. E. 2004. Eleventh month, eleventh day, eleventh hour: Armistice day, 1918 World War I and its violent climax. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  91. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2000. The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  92. Porch, D. 2000. Military “culture” and the fall of France in 1940: A review essay. International Security, 24(4): 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  94. Posen, B. R. 1984. The sources of military doctrine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Pringle, C., & Kroll, M. 1997. Why Trafalgar was won before it was fought: Lessons from resource-based theory. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4): 73–89.Google Scholar
  96. Rawski, T. J., & Perkins, D. H. 2008. Forecasting China’s economic growth to 2025. In L. Brandt & T. J. Rawski (Eds.). China’s great economic transformation: 829–887. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 123–155.Google Scholar
  98. Ries, A., & Trout, J. 1985. Marketing warfare. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  99. Sbrega, J. 1989. The war against Japan, 1941–1945: An annotated bibliography. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  100. Schelling, T. C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Schelling, T. C. 1966. Arms and influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Schelling, T. C. 2007. Strategies of commitment and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Shirer, W. 1970. Collapse of the Third Republic. New York: Cox & Wilson.Google Scholar
  104. Spires, D. J. 1984. Image and reality: The making of the German officer. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  105. Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: The effect of personal responsibility and decision consequences upon commitment to a previously chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Strachan, H. 2003. The First World War: Volume I: To arms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Strachan, H. 2005. The First World War. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  108. Sun, T. 1963. The art of war. S. B. Griffith (Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Taylor, A. J. P. 1961. The origins of the Second World War. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  110. Thomas, M. 1997. Britain, France and appeasement: Anglo-French relations in the popular front era. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  111. TLS. 1995. The hundred most influential books since the war. TLS, the Times Literary Supplement, October 6: 39–45.Google Scholar
  112. Trachtenberg, M. 1988. The development of American strategic thought, 1945–1969. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  113. Trachtenberg, M. 1991. History and strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Trumpener, U. 1976. War premeditated? German intelligence operations in July 1914. Central European History, 9: 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Tuchman, B. 1962. The guns of August. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  116. Van Creveld, M. 1982. Fighting power: German and US army performance, 1939–1945. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  117. Weinberg, G. 2005. A world at arms: A global history of World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Wood, G. 2009. Empire of liberty: A history of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  119. Worthing, P. M. 2007. A military history of modern China: From the Manchu conquest to Tian’anmen Square. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  120. Wynne, G. C. 1976. If Germany attacks: The Battle of Depth in the West. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  121. Young, H. 1976. The misunderstanding of August 1, 1914. Journal of Modern History, 48: 644–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  2. 2.Nottingham Business SchoolNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations