Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 25–50 | Cite as

Risk and capital structure in Asian project finance

  • Paul M. VaalerEmail author
  • Barclay E. James
  • Ruth V. Aguilera
Article

Abstract

We develop and test hypotheses derived from a multi-level theoretical framework for understanding factors shaping the credit risk and capital structure of a quintessentially Asian form of investment known as project finance. It differs from other corporate financing approaches. A project company is separate and bankruptcy remote from the investing firm sponsors that create it. The project company relies extensively on debt capital provided by creditors to fund project operations. Creditors provide more (less) debt as a percentage of overall project capital when there is less (more) risk of project failure and non-repayment. We define a target risk framework identifying country-, industry-, syndicate-, firm-, and project-related factors shaping Asian project finance company credit risk and thus, project debt. In a sample of 238 project finance companies announced in 13 Asian countries from 1995–2004, we observe substantial effects on project capital structure with respect to country-level factors linked to institutional and macroeconomic theories, syndicate structure factors linked to agency theory, and lead sponsor experience and project size factors linked to learning and transaction cost theories. We argue that these and other determinants of project finance company credit risk and capital structure in Asia since the mid-1990s anticipate similar relationships now emerging elsewhere around the globe.

Keywords

Project finance Foreign direct investment Risk Capital structure Governance Institutions 

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan, S., & Fox, I. 1993. Asset specificity, firm heterogeneity and capital structure. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, L., Aivazian, A., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. 2001. Capital structure in developing countries. Journal of Finance, 56: 87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brealy, R., & Myers, S. 2006. Principles of corporate finance (8th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Buljevich, E., & Park, Y. 1999. Project financing and the international capital markets. Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, R., & Packer, F. 1996. Determinants and impacts of sovereign credit ratings. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, October Volume: 37–53.Google Scholar
  7. Coffee, J. 1999. The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwestern University Law Review, 93: 641–708.Google Scholar
  8. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 453–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djankov, S., McLiesh, S., & Shleifer, A. 2007. Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84:299–329.Google Scholar
  10. Doh, J., Teegan, H., & Mudambi, R. 2004. Balancing private and state ownership in emerging markets telecommunications infrastructure: Country, industry, and firm influences. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esty, B. 2002. Returns on project-financed investments: Evolution and managerial implications. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esty, B. 2003. The economic foundations for using project finance. Working paper, Harvard Business School. Available electronically on December 15, 2006 at: http://www.people.hbs.edu/besty/BCE%20PF%20Motivations%202-14-03.pdf.
  13. Esty, B. 2004. Why study large projects? An introduction to research on project finance. European Financial Management, 10: 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esty, B., & Megginson, W. 2003. Creditor rights, enforcement, and debt ownership structure: Evidence from the global syndicated loan market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37: 38–59.Google Scholar
  15. Finnerty, J. 1996. Project financing: Asset-based financial engineering. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Ghemewat, P. 1991. Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  17. Hadfield, G. 2005. Contract law is not enough: The many legal institutions that support contractual commitments. In Claude Menard & Mary Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Hammond, J., & Allan, G. 1974. Bougainville copper ltd. (B-E). Harvard Business School Publishing Case #174104, 175071–175072, 175304. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. 1991. The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance, 46: 297–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henisz, W., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. John, T., & John, K. 1991. Optimality of project financing: Theory and empirical implications in finance and accounting. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang, L. 1998. Project finance in Asia (Advances in Finance, Investment, and Banking, V. 6). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Ltd. (North-Holland).Google Scholar
  25. LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lessard, D. 1996. Incorporating country risk in the valuation of offshore projects. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9: 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Libecap, G. 1989. Contracting for property rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lieberman, M. 1989. The learning curve, technology barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luo, Y., & Peng, M. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Makino, S., & Beamish, P. 1998. Local ownership restrictions, entry mode choice, and FDI performance: Japanese overseas subsidiaries in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, K. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, K., & Peng, M. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell, W. 1991. Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48: 261–297.Google Scholar
  35. Myers, S. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39: 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Peng, M. 2003. Institutional transactions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng, M. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peng, M., & Delios, A. 2006. What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pistor, K., Raiser, M., & Gelfer, S. 2000. Law and finance in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 8: 325–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajan, K. S., & Pangarkar, N. 2000. Mode of entry choice: An empirical study of Singaporean multinationals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. 1995. What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, 50: 1421–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynolds, T., & Flores, A. 1989. Foreign law: Current sources of codes and basic legislation in jurisdictions of the world (1st ed.). Littleton, CO: F.B. Rothman.Google Scholar
  44. Reynolds, T., & Flores, A. 2003. Foreign law: Current sources of codes and basic legislation in jurisdictions of the world (2nd ed.). Littleton, CO: F.B. Rothman.Google Scholar
  45. Ribstein, L. 2005. Cross-listing and regulatory competition. Review of Law and Economics, 1: 1–50.Google Scholar
  46. Shaver, M., Mitchell, W., & Yeung, B. 1997. The effect of own-firm and other-firm experience on foreign direct investment survival in the United States, 1987–1992. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 811–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stata Corp. 2005. Stata statistical software: Release 9.2. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  48. Thomson-SDC. 2006. Thomson-securities data corporation project finance investment database. New York, NY: Thomson Financial.Google Scholar
  49. Vaaler, P. 2007. How do MNCs vote in developing country elections? Academy of Management Journal, 50. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  50. Vaaler, P., & McNamara, G. 2004. Crisis and competition in expert organizational decision making: Credit rating agencies and their response to turbulence in emerging economies. Organization Science, 15: 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaaler, P., Schrage, B., & Block, S. 2006. Elections, opportunism, partisanship and sovereign ratings in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 10: 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, H., Huang, H., & Bansal, P. 2005. What determined success during the Asian economic crisis? The importance of experiential knowledge and group affiliation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. WDI. 2006. World Development Indicators, 2005. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  54. Williamson, O. 1988. Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 43: 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul M. Vaaler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barclay E. James
    • 1
  • Ruth V. Aguilera
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, College of BusinessUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations