Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 341–358 | Cite as

Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: Exploring the effect of employee mobility

  • Qin YangEmail author
  • Crystal X. Jiang


With multinational corporations increasingly seeking subsidiaries’ specific advantages in foreign countries to develop their innovative capabilities, internationalization of research and development has been greatly emphasized. However, in emerging economies, managers are encountering the challenge of high employee mobility under the weak intellectual property protection regime. This article investigates subsidiaries’ employee mobility and proposes that it negatively moderates the relationship between location advantages and the level of subsidiaries’ R&D. This article extends R&D internationalization and enhances current understanding of subsidiaries’ R&D activities. Further, it provides managerial implications as to how managers can improve R&D outcome by mitigating obstacles in emerging economies.


Employee mobility Intellectual property protection Location advantages Subsidiaries’ R&D 


  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. 1998. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. 2005. Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 701–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., & Vickers, J. 2001. Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Review of Economic Studies, 68: 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. A., Bloom, J. R., & Nuchols, B. A. 1994. Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: An organizational-level analysis. Industrial Relations, 33: 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7): 905–917.Google Scholar
  6. Andersson, T., Serger, S., Sörvik, J., & Hansson, E. 2004. The cluster policies whitebook. Malmö, Sweden: Holmbergs i Malmö.Google Scholar
  7. Anton, J. & Yao, D. 2004. Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. 2000. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantages in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1): 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnold, D., & Quelch, J. 1998. New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1): 7–20.Google Scholar
  10. Arundel, A. 2001. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4): 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker, J. B. 2001. Can antitrust keep up? Brookings Review, Winter, 15–19.Google Scholar
  12. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 2002. Building competitive advantage through people. Sloan Management Review, 43(2): 34–41.Google Scholar
  13. Battisti, G., & Stoneman, P. 2003. Inter- and intra-firm effects in the diffusion of new process technology. Research Policy, 32: 1641–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beach, S. 2006. Job hopping rampant as China’s economy chases skilled workers. Los Angeles Times, February 22. (Accessed 3 January, 2007).
  15. Besen, S., & Raskind, L. 1991. An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  16. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. 1999. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66: 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1988. The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in Chinese economic reforms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boston Consulting Group. 2005. Navigating the five currents of globalization. (Accessed 23 February, 2007).
  20. Buckely, C. 2004. Let a thousand ideas flower: China is a new hotbed of research. New York: New York Times (September 13, C. 1).Google Scholar
  21. Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. 1998. MNCs, technological innovation and regional systems in the EU: Some evidence in the Italian case. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3): 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Carlin, W., Glyn, A., & Van Reenen, J. 2001. Export market performance of OECD countries: An empirical examination of the role of cost competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 111(468): 128–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carmel, E. 2003. The new software exporting nations: Success factors. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 13(4): 1–12.Google Scholar
  25. Chen, H. L., & Huang, Y. S. 2006. Employee stock ownership and corporate R&D expenditures: Evidence from Taiwan’s information-technology industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(3): 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, X. P., & Glen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of Guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheung, K., & Lin, P. 2004. Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review, 15(1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davies, H., Leung, T. K. P., Luk, S. T. K., & Wong, Y. H. 1995. The benefits of “guanxi”—The value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management, 24(3): 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davis, L., & Meyer, K. 2004. Subsidiary research and development, and the local environment. International Business Review, 13: 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davis, L. 2000. What location advantages do MNE research subsidiaries in Europe value highest? Paper presented to the DRUID summer workshop on Rebild, Denmark, June15–17.Google Scholar
  31. Dess, G., & Shaw, J. 2001. Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. 2003. Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1): 50–64.Google Scholar
  33. Dunning, J., & Narula, R. 2004. Multinationals and industrial competitiveness: A new agenda. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Dunning, J. 1980. Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2006. Country briefing., (Accessed 1 February, 2007).
  37. Edler, J., Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Reger, G. 2002. Changes in the strategic management of technology: Results of a global benchmark survey. R&D Management, 32(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Evalueserve Study. 2005. India scores highest in BRIC countries as preferred R&D destination., (Accessed 2 February, 2007).
  39. Feinberg, S. E., & Majumdar, S. K. 2001. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Financial Times. 2005. Innovative Asia: How spending on research and development is opening the way to a new sphere of influence. June 9, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. Foss. M. J., & Pedersen, T. 2002. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Frost, T. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Garden, A. M. 1990. Career orientations of software developers in a sample of high tech companies. R&D Management, 20(4): 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gassmann, O., & Han, Z. 2004. Motivations and barriers of foreign R&D activities in China. R&D Management, 34(4): 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gavin, R. 2005. US could lose high-tech edge, study says. The Boston Globe, August 8.Google Scholar
  46. Geroski, P. 1995. Market structure, corporate performance and innovative activity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Håkanson, L. 1992. Locational determinants of foreign R&D in Swedish multinationals. In Granstrand O. et al. (Eds.), Technology management and international, Business: 97–115, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harzing, A., & Noorderhaven, N. 2006. Geographical distance and the role and management of subsidiaries: The case of subsidiaries down-under. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–530.Google Scholar
  51. Hines, J. R. 1994. International taxation. NBER Reporter, Fall: 10–15.Google Scholar
  52. Horstmann, I., MacDonald, G., & Slivinski, A. 1985. Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent. Journal of Political Economy, 93(5): 837–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. König, H., & Licht, G. 1995. Patents, R&D and innovation: Evidence from the Mannheim innovation panel. Ifo-Studien, 41: 521–545.Google Scholar
  54. Kuermmerle, W. 1999. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lall, S. 1979. The international allocation of research activity by US multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41: 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee, D. Y., & Dawes, P. L. 2005. Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2): 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li, S., & Scullion, H. 2006. Bridging the distance: Managing cross-border knowledge holders. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li, W. 2005. Competition for professionals drives salaries. China Daily, September 28. (Accessed 15 December, 2006).
  60. Lundvall, B. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In Dosi G. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Luo, Y. 2000. How to enter China: Choices and lessons. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  62. Luo, Y. 2001. Determinants of entry in an emerging economy: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Studies, 38(3): 443–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madsen, T., Mosakowski, E., & Zaheer, S. 2003. Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: The nondisruptive effects of inflows of experience. Organizational Science, 14(2): 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mansfield, E. 1988. Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A comparative study. American Economic Review, 78(2): 223–228.Google Scholar
  65. McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2005. Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning, 37: 1857–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1133–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meyer, K. 2004. Perspectives on multinational enterprises on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miller, D., & Chen, M. 1994. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Møen, J. 2005. Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1): 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mudambi, R., & Mudambi, S. 2005. Multinational enterprise knowledge flows: The effect of government inward investment policy. Management International Review, 45(2): 155–178.Google Scholar
  71. Nadiri, I. 1993. Innovations and technological spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423. National Bureau of Economic Research: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  72. Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nelson, R. (Ed.) 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Nickell, S. 1996. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4): 724–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. OECD, 1998. Internationalisation of industrial R&D: Patterns and trend, Paris.Google Scholar
  77. OECD 1999. R&D, globalization and governments. OECD Observer, Paris.Google Scholar
  78. Parise, S., Cross, R., & Davenport, T. 2006. Strategies for preventing a knowledge-loss crisis. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4): 31–38.Google Scholar
  79. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1995. The localized creation of global technological advantage. In Molero J. (Eds.), Technological innovation, multinational corporations and new international competitiveness — The case of intermediate countries. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  80. Patel, P., & Vega, M. 1999. Patterns of internationalisation and corporate technology: location versus home country advantages. Research Policy, 28: 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pearce, R. 1997. Global competition and technology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  82. Peng, M., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Peng, M. 2002. Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Peng, M. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(2): 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Rawski, T. 1994. Chinese industrial reform: Accomplishments, prospects, and implications. American Economic Review, 84(2): 271–275.Google Scholar
  87. Roberts, P. 2001. Innovation and firm-level persistent profitability: A Schumpeterian framework. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22(4/5): 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Robson, M. 1993. Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research. Southern Economic Journal, 60(1): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ronstadt, R. C. 1978. International R&D: The establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Scotchmer, S., & Green, J. 1990. Novelty and disclosure in patent law. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spence, P. 1984. Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  92. Sunday Times, 2006. Job hopping rampant as skilled workers chased. (Accessed 22 February, 2006).
  93. Teece, D. 1986. Profiting from technological innovations. Research Policy, 15(6): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Teece, D. J. 1976. The multinational corporation cost of international technology transfer. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  95. Tsang, E. W. K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64–73.Google Scholar
  96. UNCTAD, 2005. World Investment Report 2005: Internationalization of R&D. (Accessed 4 December, 2005).
  97. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005. Archived News Releases for Job Openings and Labor Turnover—2005 job openings and labor turnover. (Accessed 5 January, 2006).
  98. Verspagen, B. 1991. Endogenous innovations in neo-classical growth models: A survey. Journal of Microeconomics, 14(4): 631–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. World Economic Forum. 2006. Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007 (Accessed 2 February, 2007).
  101. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhao, M. Y. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8): 1185–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fox School of Business and Management, General & Strategic Management DepartmentTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations