Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 385–405 | Cite as

What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective

Editorial

Abstract

“What determines the scope of the firm?” is a fundamental question in strategy research. We argue that a new generation of diversification research needs to address the extended question: What determines the scope of the firm—both product and geographic—over time and around the world? This article has three goals: (1) to increase awareness among researchers on the necessity to add the much needed but often neglected time and geographic dimensions by introducing a new typology in diversification research, (2) to review how Asia Pacific research, including articles in this Special Issue, has contributed to our global understanding along both dimensions, and (3) to advance an institution-based view on diversification strategies that has largely been propelled by Asia Pacific research.

Keywords

Scope of the firm Product diversification Geographic diversification Institution-based view 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2004. Turnaround in Asia: Laying the foundation for understanding the unique domain. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 5–24.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. 2004. Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 263–285.Google Scholar
  3. Au, K., Peng, M. W., & Wang, D. 2000. Interlocking directorates, firm strategies, and performance in Hong Kong: Toward a research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 29–47.Google Scholar
  4. Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. 2002. Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67: 121–148.Google Scholar
  5. Bodnar, G., Tang, C., & Weintrop, J. 1997. Both sides of corporate diversification: The value impacts of geographic and industrial diversification. Working paper no. 6224, NBER, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, H. P., & Wiersema, M. F. 2005. Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1153–1171.Google Scholar
  7. Brookfield, J., & Liu, R.-J. 2005. The internationalization of a production network and the replication dilemma: Building supplier networks in mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 355–380.Google Scholar
  8. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Wan, J. C. C. 2003. Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 519–540.Google Scholar
  9. Carney, M. 2004. The institutions of industrial restructuring in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 171–188.Google Scholar
  10. Chacar, A., & Vissa, B. 2005. Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 933–946.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, D. 2002. Questions about change over time in cross-cultural organizational research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 449–457.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, S.-J. 1996. An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: Entry, exit and economic performance during 1981–89. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 587–611.Google Scholar
  13. Chang, S.-J. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 238–253.Google Scholar
  14. Chang, S.-J. (Ed.) 2006a. Business groups in East Asia: Financial crisis, restructuring, and new growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chang, S.-J. 2006b. Business groups in East Asia: Post-crisis restructuring and new growth. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, S.-J., & Hong, J. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 429–449.Google Scholar
  17. Chang, S.-J., & Hong, J. 2002. How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management Journal, 23: 265–274.Google Scholar
  18. Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N., & Mahmood, I. P. 2006. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Chen, H., & Chen. T. 1998. Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29: 445–468.Google Scholar
  20. Chu, W. 2001. Contingency organizations and shared values: Multiple logics in managing diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18: 83–99.Google Scholar
  21. Chung, C.-N. 2001. Markets, culture, and institutions: The emergence of large business groups in Taiwan, 1950s–1970s. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 719–745.Google Scholar
  22. Chung, H.-M. 2006. Managerial ties, control, and deregulation: An investigation of business groups entering the deregulated banking industry in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  23. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. 2003. When does corporate diversification matter to productivity and performance? Evidence from East Asia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11: 365–392.Google Scholar
  24. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 81–112.Google Scholar
  25. Coase, R. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4: 386–405.Google Scholar
  26. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2006. Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, G., Diekmann, K., & Tinsley, C. 1994. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1990s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59: 547–570.Google Scholar
  28. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 711–727.Google Scholar
  29. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1028–1038.Google Scholar
  30. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. International business: An Asia-Pacific perspective (1st ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia (Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  31. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2005. Regional and global strategies of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 45(1): 19–36.Google Scholar
  32. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. 2000. Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 305–341.Google Scholar
  33. Delios, A., Xu, W. W., & Singh, K. 2007. Strategy research in Asia. In H. Yeung (Ed.), Handbook of research on Asian business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. 2002. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 57: 1951–1979.Google Scholar
  35. Dieleman, M., & Sachs, W. 2006. Oscillating between a relationship-based and a market-based model: The Salim Group. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  36. Dow, S., & McGuire, J. 1999. The sources and advantages of Japanese industrial organization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16: 47–74.Google Scholar
  37. Dunning, J. H. 2006. Comment on “dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 139–141.Google Scholar
  38. Erramilli, M. K., Agarwal, S., & Kim, S.-S. 1997. Are firm specific advantages location specific too? Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 735–757.Google Scholar
  39. Erramilli, M. K., Srivastava, R., & Kim, S.-S. 1999. Internationalization theory and Korean multinationals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16: 29–45.Google Scholar
  40. Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y., & Piesse, J. 2005. Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 257–284.Google Scholar
  41. Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. 2000. Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 51–80.Google Scholar
  42. Guillen, M. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 362–380.Google Scholar
  43. Guillen, M. 2003. Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 185–198.Google Scholar
  44. Guthrie, D. 1997. Between markets and polities: Organizational responses to reform in China. American Journal of Sociology, 102: 1258–1304.Google Scholar
  45. Hamilton, G., & Feenstra, R. 1995. Varieties of hierarchies and markets: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4: 51–91.Google Scholar
  46. Han, C. M. 2002. Korea’s direct investments in China: Technology, experience, and ownership factors in performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 109–126.Google Scholar
  47. Henisz, W., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 443–475.Google Scholar
  48. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 767–798.Google Scholar
  49. Hoskisson, R., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 249–267.Google Scholar
  50. Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R., Tihanyi, L., & White, R. 2005. Diversified business groups and corporate refocusing in emerging economies. Journal of Management, 31: 941–965.Google Scholar
  51. Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Goerzen, A. 2006. Japanese horizontal keiretsu and the performance implications of membership. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  52. Jones, G., & Hill, C. 1988. Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 159–172.Google Scholar
  53. Kedia, B., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. 2006. Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (in press).Google Scholar
  54. Keister, L. 1998. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 404–440.Google Scholar
  55. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–51.Google Scholar
  56. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. Is group membership profitable in emerging markets: An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55, 867–891.Google Scholar
  57. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 45–74.Google Scholar
  58. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. Journal of Business, 78, 301–340.Google Scholar
  59. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R., Tihanyi, L., & Hong, J. 2004a. The evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: The lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 25–48.Google Scholar
  60. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R., & Wan, W. 2004b. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 613–636.Google Scholar
  61. Kumar, M. V. S., & Seth, A. 2005. The relationship between product and international diversification. Working paper, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  62. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–1155.Google Scholar
  63. Lau, C. M. 2002. Asian management research: Frontiers and challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 171–178.Google Scholar
  64. Lee, C., & Beamish, P. W. 1995. The characteristics and performance of Korean joint ventures in LDCS. Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 637–654.Google Scholar
  65. Lee, J.-R., & Chen, J.-S. 2003. Internationalization, local adaptation, and subsidiary’s entrepreneurship: An exploratory study on Taiwanese manufacturing firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 51–72.Google Scholar
  66. Lee, K. B., Peng, M. W., & Lee, K. 2007. From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions. Journal of World Business (in press).Google Scholar
  67. Leung, K., & White, S. (Eds.) 2004. Handbook of Asian management. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  68. Li, P. P. 2003. Toward a geocentric theory of multinational evolution: The implications from the Asian MNEs as latecomers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 217–242.Google Scholar
  69. Li, M., Ramaswamy, K., & Petitt, B. S. P. 2006. Business groups and market failures: A focus on vertical and horizontal strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  70. Li, M., & Wong, Y. 2003. Diversification and economic performance: An empirical assessment of Chinese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 243–265.Google Scholar
  71. Lim, G. E., & Teck, T. Y. 1995. Diversification strategies, firm characteristics and performance among Singapore firms. International Journal of Management, 12(2): 223–233.Google Scholar
  72. Lin, T., Ping, E. J., & Chiu, W. 2005. International diversification and performance: Evidence from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 65–88.Google Scholar
  73. Lincoln, J., Gerlach, M., & Ahmadjian, C. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61: 67–88.Google Scholar
  74. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 565–586.Google Scholar
  75. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis? Academy of Management Journal, 47: 598–609.Google Scholar
  76. Lu, Y., & Yao, J. 2006. Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  77. Luo, X., & Chung, C. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 404–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Luo, Y., & Peng, M. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 269–296.Google Scholar
  79. Ma, X. F., Yao, X. T., & Xi, Y. M. 2006. Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  80. Mahmood, I. P., & Mitchell, W. 2004. Two faces: Effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science, 50: 1348–1365.Google Scholar
  81. Makino, S., & Beamish, P. 1998. Local ownership restrictions, entry mode choice, and FDI performance: Japanese overseas subsidiaries in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 119–136.Google Scholar
  82. Makino, S., & Delios, A. 1996. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 905–927.Google Scholar
  83. Makino, S., Lau, C.-M., & Yeh, R.-S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 403–421.Google Scholar
  84. Mathews, J. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 5–27.Google Scholar
  85. McGuire, J., & Dow, S. 2003. The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 374–388.Google Scholar
  86. Meyer, K. E. 2006a. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.Google Scholar
  87. Meyer, K. E. 2006b. Globalfocusing: From domestic conglomerate to global specialist. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1109–1144.Google Scholar
  88. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64: 165–187.Google Scholar
  89. Mursitama, T. N. 2006. Creating relational rents: The effect of business groups on affiliated firms’ performance in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): this issue.Google Scholar
  90. Nachum, L. 2004. Geographic and industrial diversification of developing country firms. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 273–294.Google Scholar
  91. Narula, R. 2006. Globalization, new ecologies, new zoologies, and the purported death of the eclectic paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 143–151.Google Scholar
  92. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Oh, D., Choi, C.-J., & Choi, E. 1998. The globalization strategy of Daewoo Motor Company. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 185–204.Google Scholar
  94. Palich, L., Cardinal, L., & Miller, C. 2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 155–174.Google Scholar
  95. Pananond, P., & Zeithaml, C. 1998. The international expansion process of MNEs from developing countries: A case study of Thailand’s C. P. Group. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 163–184.Google Scholar
  96. Pangarkar, N. 1998. The Asian multinational corporation: Strategies, performance, and key challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 109–118.Google Scholar
  97. Peng, M. W. 1997. Firm growth in transition economies: Three longitudinal cases from China, 1989–96. Organization Studies, 18: 385–413.Google Scholar
  98. Peng, M. W. 2002. Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 251–267.Google Scholar
  99. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.Google Scholar
  100. Peng, M. W. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123–141.Google Scholar
  101. Peng, M. W. 2006. Global strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  102. Peng, M. W., Au, K., & Wang, D. 2001a. Interlocking directorates as corporate governance in Third World multinationals: Theory and evidence from Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18: 161–181.Google Scholar
  103. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.Google Scholar
  104. Peng, M. W., Lee, S.-H., & Tan, J. 2001b. The keiretsu in Asia: Implications for multilevel theories of competitive advantage. Journal of International Management, 7: 253–276.Google Scholar
  105. Peng, M. W., Lee, S.-H., & Wang, D. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30: 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Porter, M. E. 2004. Competition in global industries: A conceptual framework. In C. E. Bartlett, S. Ghoshal, & J. Birkinshaw (Eds.), Transnational management: Texts, cases and readings in cross-border management (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  107. Rajan, K., & Pangarkar, R. 2000. Mode of entry choice: An empirical study of Singaporean multinationals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 49–66.Google Scholar
  108. Ramaswamy, K., & Li, M. 2001. Foreign investors, foreign directors, and corporate diversification: An empirical investigation of large manufacturing companies in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18: 207–222.Google Scholar
  109. Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Petitt, B. 2004. Who drives unrelated diversification? A study of Indian manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 403–423.Google Scholar
  110. Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Veliyath, R. 2002. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: A study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 345–358.Google Scholar
  111. Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. F. 2003. The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: Analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 39–59.Google Scholar
  112. Rose, E., & Ito, K. 2004. On the relationship between Japanese manufacturing firms and their domestic subsidiaries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 469–490.Google Scholar
  113. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 3–18.Google Scholar
  114. Rumelt, R. 1974. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  115. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. (Eds). 1994. Fundamental issues in strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  116. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  117. Sim, A. B., & Pandian, J. R. 2003. Emerging Asian MNEs and their internationalization strategies—Case study evidence on Taiwanese and Singapore firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 27–50.Google Scholar
  118. Singh, K., & Delios, A. 2005. Strategy for success in Asia. Singapore: Wiley.Google Scholar
  119. Sullivan, D. 1994. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 325–342.Google Scholar
  120. Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 179–196.Google Scholar
  121. Tong, T., Reuer, J., & Peng, M. W. 2007. International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal (in press).Google Scholar
  122. Wan, C. 1998. International diversification, industrial diversification and firm performance of Hong Kong MNCs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 205–217.Google Scholar
  123. Wan, W. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 161–182.Google Scholar
  124. Wan, W., & Hoskisson, R. 2003. Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 27–45.Google Scholar
  125. Wang, H., Huang, H., & Bansal, P. 2005. What determines success during the Asian economic crisis? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 89–106.Google Scholar
  126. White, S. 2002. Rigor and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 252–287.Google Scholar
  127. White, S. 2004. Stakeholders, structure, and the failure of corporate governance reform initiatives in post-crisis Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 103–122.Google Scholar
  128. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.Google Scholar
  129. Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. 2006. What drives start-ups to venture from emerging economies to developed economies. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  130. Yeung, H. W. C. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of research on Asian business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  131. Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 183–206.Google Scholar
  132. Young, S., Huang, C. H., & McDermott, M. 1996. Internationalization and competitive catch-up processes: Case study evidence on Chinese multinational enterprises. Management International Review, 36: 295–314.Google Scholar
  133. Young, M. N., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Chan, E. S. 2001. The resource dependence, service, and control functions of boards of directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18: 223–244.Google Scholar
  134. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2006. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A focus on principal–principal conflicts. Working paper, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China, and University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  135. Zhou, N. 2006. Diversification and diffusion—A social networks and neoinstitutional approach. MSc Thesis, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  136. Zin, R. 1999. Malaysian reverse investments: Trends and strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16: 469–496.Google Scholar
  137. Zutshi, R. K., & Gibbons, P. 1998. The internationalization process of Singapore government-linked companies: A contextual view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15: 219–246.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations