Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 439–452 | Cite as

Business groups and market failures: A focus on vertical and horizontal strategies

  • Mingfang Li
  • Kannan Ramaswamy
  • Barbara S. Pécherot Petitt
Article

Abstract

Drawing from transaction cost economics and strategic management, this paper develops a series of propositions that link market failure with corporate strategy. In doing so, the paper focuses on both vertical and horizontal strategies as strategic approaches that could be used to address different types of market failure. The significant contribution of the paper lies in its deconstruction of the various types of market failure and developing a theoretically grounded set of propositions that identifies appropriate corporate strategic responses that can be used to ameliorate the negative consequences of each type of failure. In doing so it also explores the evolution of business groups and the viability of strategic choices that groups are likely to make as they navigate the emerging market terrain.

Keywords

Business groups Diversification Vertical integration Market failures 

References

  1. Baker, G., & Holmstrom, B. 1995. Internal labor markets: Too many theories, too few facts. American Economic Review, 85: 230–255.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, D. P. 1995. Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2): 47–66.Google Scholar
  3. Bator, F. M. 1958. The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72: 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, M. T., & Mauer, D. C. 2000. Diversification and the value of internal capital markets: The case of tracking stock. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24: 1457–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. 2003. Strategic innovation and the administrative heritage of East Asian family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casson, M. 1984. The theory of vertical Integration: A survey and synthesis. Journal of Economic Studies, 11(2): 3–43.Google Scholar
  7. Chandler, A. D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, A. D., Jr. 1991. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, S.-J. 2006. Business groups in East Asia: Financial crisis, restructuring and new growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chu, W. 2001. Contingency organizations and shared values: Multiple logics in managing diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4: 386–405(new series).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. 1997. Corporate strategy: Resources and the scope of the firm. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
  13. Galbraith, J. R., & Nathanson, D. A. 1978. Strategy implementation: The role of structure and process. St. Paul, Minnesota: West.Google Scholar
  14. Gertner, R. H., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. 1994. Internal versus external capital markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 1211–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goold, M., & Campbell, A. 2002. Designing effective organizations: How to create structured networks. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. 1994. Corporate-level strategy: Creating value in the multibusiness company. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Luchs, K. 1993. Strategies and styles revisited: Strategic planning and financial control. Long Range Planning, 26(5): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant, R. M. 2002. Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications (4th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. The Journal of Political Economy, 94: 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guillen, M. F. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulati, R., Lawrence, P. R., & Puranam, P. 2005. Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallwood, C. P. 1992. Perceptions of market efficacy, transaction costs, and vertical disintegration in offshore oil gathering. Journal of Economic Studies, 19(3): 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hennart, J.-F. 2001. Theories of the multinational enterprises. In Rugman, A. M. & Brewer, T. L. (Eds.). Oxford handbook of international business: 127–149. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill, C. W. L. 1988. Internal capital market controls and financial performance in multidivisional firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houston, J., James, C., & Marcus, D. 1997. Capital market frictions and the role of internal capital markets in banking. Journal of Financial Economics, 46: 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, R. L. 1974. Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 52(5): 90–102.Google Scholar
  28. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–51.Google Scholar
  29. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1999a. Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: The evolution of business groups in Chile and India. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 8: 271–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1999b. The right way to restructure conglomerates in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(4): 125–134.Google Scholar
  31. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000a. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000b. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55: 867–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6): 63–76.Google Scholar
  34. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Hong, J. 2004. The evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: The lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(1–2): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. 1967. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, K., & He, X. 2005. Capability of the Samsung Group: Creating in Korea and replicating in China. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management Conference and Special Issue on Business Groups, Singapore.Google Scholar
  37. Li, M., & Wong, Y. Y. 2003. Diversification and economic performance: An empirical assessment of Chinese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20: 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin, T., Ping, E. J., & Chiu, W. K. C. 2005. International diversification and performance: Evidence from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo, X., & Chung, C.-N. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 404–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, J. D., & Sayrak, A. 2003. Corporate diversification and shareholder value: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9: 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mathews, J. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. 2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.Google Scholar
  44. Peng, M. W. 2005. From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peng, M. W., Lee, S.-H., & Wang, D. Y. L. 2005. What determines the scope of the firm over time: A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review, 30: 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Pécherot Petitt, B. S. 2004. Who drives unrelated diversification? A study of Indian manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shiba, T., & Shimotani, M. 1997. Beyond the firm: Business groups in international and historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Silva, F., Majluf, N., & Paredes, R. D. 2006. Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59: 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinha, J. 2005. Global champions from emerging markets. McKinsey Quarterly, 2005(2): 27–35.Google Scholar
  51. Stein, J. C. 1997. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52: 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stiglitz, J. E. 1989. Markets, market failures, and development. The American Economic Review, 79: 197–203.Google Scholar
  53. Teece, D. J. 1981. The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power considerations. Sloan Management Review, 22(3): 3–17.Google Scholar
  54. Whitley, R. D. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, O. E. 1971. The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. American Economic Review, 61: 112–123.Google Scholar
  56. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Market and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu, W.-P., & Choi, W. L. 2004. Transaction cost, social capital and firms’ synergy creation in Chinese business networks: An integrative approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingfang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kannan Ramaswamy
    • 3
  • Barbara S. Pécherot Petitt
    • 4
  1. 1.Hohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of ManagementCalifornia State University, NorthridgeNorthridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Global BusinessThunderbird: The Garvin School of International ManagementGlendaleUSA
  4. 4.CERAM Sophia AntipolisSophia Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations