Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 65–88 | Cite as

International Diversification and Performance: Evidence from Singapore

  • Lin Tongli
  • Er Jwee Ping
  • Winston Kwok Chee Chiu
Article

Abstract

This study focuses on how international diversification affects a firm in terms of multiple performance measures (accounting-based, market-based, and intangible value creation). The study is unique as it uses segment data made available only recently, which enables the examination of both product and international diversification with performance. The period studied coincided with Singapore firms’ performance during the Asian Financial Crisis. In contrast to previous studies on Singapore, our results show that product diversification is negatively correlated to all measures of performance, while international market diversification is positively correlated. We attribute the difference to the time period which covers both upswings and downturns of the economy, unlike previous studies which considered only the former. Other control measures were incorporated; firm size is highly significant in explaining all measures of performance but not so for firm age, leverage, risk and industry. For top managers, we suggest that regardless of economic climate, the dominant diversification strategy is to take a focused approach to product diversification, but a broad approach to international diversification.

Keywords

product diversification international diversification firm performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Amit and J. Livnat, “A concept of conglomerate diversification,” Journal of Management, vol. 14, pp. 593–604, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. M.P. Anju, “Diversification patterns in India: A study of strategies in early industrialization,” 7, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Business Administration, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. H.O. Armour and T.J. Teece, “Organization structure, economic performance: A test of the multidivisional hypothesis,” The Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 106–122, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. C.A. Bartlett and S. Ghoshal, Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. P.G. Berger and E. Ofek, “Diversification’s effect on firm value,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 39–65, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. C.H. Berry, Corporate Growth and Diversification, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. R.A. Bettis, “Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 379–393, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. R.A. Bettis and V. Mahajan, “Risk/return performance of diversified firms,” Management Science, vol. 31, pp. 785–799, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. E.H. Bowman, “A risk/return paradox for strategic management,” Sloan Management Review, vol. Spring, pp. 17–31, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. J. Cathie, “Financial contagion in East Asia and the origins of the economic and financial crisis in Korea,” Asia Pacific Business Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 18–28, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. R.E. Caves, Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. R.E. Caves, M.E. Porter, A.M. Spence, and J.T. Scott, Competition in the Open Economy: A Model Applied to Canada.” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. S. Chen and K.W. Ho, “Corporate diversification, ownership structure, and firm value: The Singapore evidence,” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 315–326, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. H.K. Christensen and C.A. Montgomery, “Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy vs. Market structure,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 327–343, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. D.H. Ciscel and D. Evans, “Returns to corporate diversification in the 1970s,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. S. Classens, S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. Lang, “The pattern and valuation effects of corporate diversification: A comparison of the United States,” Japan, and other East Asian Countries, Worldbank Paper, 2000 pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  17. R. Comment and G.A. Jarrell, “Corporate focus and stock returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 67–87, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. D.J. Denis, D.K. Denis, and K. Yost, “Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1951–1979, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. D.J. Denis, D.K. Denis, and A. Sarin, “Agency problems, equity ownership and corporate diversification,” Journal of Finance, pp. 135–160, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. K.C. Fong, “Financial statement analysis of asian firms before, during the Asian crisis, 345,” National University of Singapore, Faculty of Business Administration, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. M.J. Geringer, S. Tallman, and D.M. Olson, “Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 51–80, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. M.J. Geringer, P.W. Beamish, and R.C. deCosta, “Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. S. Ghoshal, “Global strategy: An organizing framework,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 425–440, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. R. Grant, “Porter’s ‘competitive advantage of nations’: An assessment,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 535–548, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. R. Grant, “On ‘dominant logic’, relatedness, the link between diversity and performance,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 639–642, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. J.F. Jr. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice, New Jersey, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. C.W.L. Hill and G.R. Jones, Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Houghton Mifflin, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  28. C.W.L. Hill, “Conglomerate performance over the economic cycle,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 197–211, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. K.B. Hisey and R.E. Caves, “Diversification strategy, choice of country: Diversification acquisitions abroad by U.S. multinationals, 1978–1980,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 51–64, 1985.Google Scholar
  30. M.A. Hitt, R.E. Hoskission, and H. Kim, “International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-related firms,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40, pp. 767–798, 1997.Google Scholar
  31. O.J. Holzmann, R.M. Copeland, and J. Hayya, Income measures of conglomerate performance, “Quarterly Review of Economics, Business,” vol. 15, pp. 67–77, 1975.Google Scholar
  32. R.E. Hoskisson, M.A. Hitt, R.A. Johnson, and D.D. Moesel, “Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 215–235, 1993.Google Scholar
  33. R.E. Hoskisson and M.A. Hitt, “Antecedents, performance outcomes of diversification: Review, critique of theoretical perspectives,” Journal of Management, vol. 16, pp. 461–509, 1990.Google Scholar
  34. S. Hymer, “The efficiency, contradictions of multinational corporations,” American Economic Review, Vol. May, pp. 441–448, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. A.P. Jacquemin and C.H. Berry, “Entropy measure of diversification, corporate growth,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 27, pp. 359–369, 1979.Google Scholar
  36. B.W. Keats, “Diversification, business economic performance revisited: Issues of measurement, causality,” Journal of Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 1990.Google Scholar
  37. T. Khanna and K. Palepu, “Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian Business Groups,” Journal of Finance, Vol. April, pp. 867–891, 2000.Google Scholar
  38. T. Khanna and K. Palepu, “Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 76, pp. 41–51, 1997.Google Scholar
  39. W.C. Kim, P. Hwang, and W.P. Burgers, “Multinationals diversification and the risk-return trade-off,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 275–286, 1993.Google Scholar
  40. W.C. Kim, P. Hwang, and W.P. Burgers, “Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–47, 1989.Google Scholar
  41. W.C. Kim, “Developing a global diversification measure,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 376–383, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. C.P. Kindelberger, American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment. Yale University Press: CT, 1968.Google Scholar
  43. B. Kogut, “Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility,” Sloan Management Review, vol. Fall, pp. 27–38, 1985.Google Scholar
  44. B. Kogut, “Foreign direct investment as a sequential process, and in C.P. Kindleberger. D.P. Audretsch (eds.), The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1983, pp. 38–56.Google Scholar
  45. L.H.P. Lang and R.M. Stulz, “Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification and firm performance,” The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1248–1280, 1994.Google Scholar
  46. J. Lee, E.H. Hall Jr., and M.W. Rutherford, “A comparative study of U.S. and Korean firms: Changes in diversification and performance,” International Journal of Commerce & Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11–41, 2003.Google Scholar
  47. M. Letiche, “Causes of the financial, economic crisis in Southeast Asia, the need for national, regional, IMF structural reforms,” Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 1998.Google Scholar
  48. T.L. Lin, Chin, S.S., Fan, S. Lim, and P.Teo, “Economic forecasting: Birth rate of Singapore, unpublished paper, National University of Singapore,” Faculty of Business Administration, 1999.Google Scholar
  49. K.V. Lin and H. Servaes, “Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets” Financial Management, vol. Summer, pp. 5–31, 2002.Google Scholar
  50. E.B. Lindenberg and S.A. Ross, “Tobin’s Q, industrial organization,” Journal of Business, vol. 54, pp. 1–32, 1981.Google Scholar
  51. S. Loescher, “Bureaucratic measurement, shuttling stock shares, shorten time horizons: Implications of economic growth,” Quarterly Review of Economics, Business, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 8–23, 1984.Google Scholar
  52. B. Loken and D.R. John, “Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact?” Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, pp. 71–84, 1993.Google Scholar
  53. K.A. Merchant and W.J. Bruns Jr., “Measurements to cure management myopia,” Business Horizons, vol. May–June, pp. 56–64, 1986.Google Scholar
  54. A. Michel and Shaked, “Airline performance under deregulation: The shareholders’ perspective,” Financial Management, Israel, vol. 13, pp. 5–14, 1984.Google Scholar
  55. S.J. Milberg, C.W. Park, and M.S.Mc.Carthy, “Managing negative feedback effects associated with brand extensions: The impact of alternative branding strategies,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–40, 1997.Google Scholar
  56. J.C. Miller and B. Pras, “The effects of multinational, export diversification on the profit stability of U.S. corporations,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 46, pp. 792–805, 1980.Google Scholar
  57. C.A. Montgomery, “Product market diversification, market power,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 789–798, 1985.Google Scholar
  58. K. Palepu, “Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 239–255, 1985.Google Scholar
  59. L.E. Palich, L.B. Cardinal, and C.C. Miller, “Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over decades of research,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. Feb, pp. 155–174, 2000.Google Scholar
  60. R.T. Pascale, “Perspectives on strategy: The real story behind Honda’s success,” California Management Review, vol. 26, pp. 47–72, 1984.Google Scholar
  61. R.D. Pearce, “Industrial diversification among the worlds leading multinational enterprises,” in Casson, M., (ed.), The Growth of International Business, George Allen & Unwin. London, 1983, pp. 140–179.Google Scholar
  62. R.A. Pitts and H.D. Hopkins, “Firm diversity: Conceptualization and measurement,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 620–629, 1982.Google Scholar
  63. M.E. Porter, “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries.” Competitors, Free Press: New York, 1980Google Scholar
  64. M.E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press: New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  65. V. Ramanujam and P. Varadarajan, “Research on Corporate Diversification: A synthesis,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 523–551, 1989.Google Scholar
  66. A.M. Rugman, International Diversification, Multinational Enterprise: Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1979.Google Scholar
  67. R.P. Rumelt, Strategy, Structure, Economic Performance. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1974.Google Scholar
  68. R.P. Rumelt, “Diversification strategy, profitability,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 359–369, 1982.Google Scholar
  69. R.P. Rumelt, “How much does industry matter?” Strategic Management Journal, vol, 12, no. 3, pp. 167–185, 1991.Google Scholar
  70. P. Samuelson, Economics. McGraw Hill, NY, 1961, pp. 663–678.Google Scholar
  71. M. Smirlock, T. Gilligan, and W. Marshall, “Tobin’s Q, the structure–performance relationship,” American Economic Review, vol. 74, pp.1051–1060, 1984.Google Scholar
  72. B.R. Tan, “A study on the impact of diversification on firm performance in Singapore,” 107, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Business Administration, 1999.Google Scholar
  73. Y.T. Tan, “Diversification strategies, performance among Singapore firms,” vol. 41, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Business Administration, 1993.Google Scholar
  74. T.L.H. Jr. and G.-M.R. Luis, “The decoupling of CEO pay, performance: An agency theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 169–190, 1989.Google Scholar
  75. N. Venkatraman and J.H. Grant, “Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique, proposal,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 1986.Google Scholar
  76. C.C. Wan, “International diversification, industrial diversification and firm performance of Hong Kong MNCs,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 15, pp. 205–217, 1998.Google Scholar
  77. L. Wrigley, Divisional Autonomy, Diversification Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Tongli
    • 1
  • Er Jwee Ping
    • 1
  • Winston Kwok Chee Chiu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Finance & Accounting, NUS Business SchoolNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations