Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 321–336

How Network Strategies and Institutional Transitions Evolve in Asia


DOI: 10.1007/s10490-005-4113-0

Cite this article as:
Peng, M.W. & Zhou, J.Q. Asia Pacific J Manage (2005) 22: 321. doi:10.1007/s10490-005-4113-0


This article contributes to the literature on network strategies and institutional transitions in emerging economies in Asia by identifying a realistic, intermediate phase between the early and late phases of institutional transitions suggested by Peng (2003). Focusing on the intermediate phase, we advance two arguments based on network strength and network content. First, in terms of network strength, we leverage earlier insights that networks can be classified as strong ties and weak ties. Consequently, we suggest that as institutional transitions unfold, strong-tie-based networks, instead of being phased out, are being transformed into weak-ties-based networks. Second, from a network content standpoint, we argue that the various scale and scope of institutional transitions shape the content of different networks which focus on business-to-government (B2G) ties and business-to-business (B2B) relationships. Our propositions delineate how different transitions of political and legal institutions affect the evolution of B2G and B2B networks. Overall, we suggest that networks not only differ in strength but also in content, and that their evolution is driven by the impact of different dimensions of institutional transitions governing B2G and B2B relationships.


network strategies institutional transitions evolution Asia 

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Provost's Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy, School of ManagementUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA
  2. 2.Fisher College of BusinessThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations