Advertisement

Automatic evolution of bi-clusters from microarray data using self-organized multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

  • Naveen SainiEmail author
  • Sriparna Saha
  • Chirag Soni
  • Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

In the current paper, a novel approach is proposed for bi-clustering of gene expression data using the fusion of differential evolution framework and self-organizing map (SOM), named as BiClustSMEA. Variable number of gene and condition cluster centers are encoded in different solutions of the population to determine the number of bi-clusters from a dataset in an automated way. The concept of SOM is utilized in designing new genetic operators for both gene and condition clusters to reach to the optimal solution in a faster way. In order to measure the goodness of a bi-clustering solution, three bi-cluster quality measures, mean squared error, row variance, and bi-cluster size, are optimized simultaneously using differential evolution as the underlying optimization strategy. The concept of polynomial mutation is incorporated in our framework to generate highly diverse solutions which in turn helps in faster convergence. The proposed approach is applied on two real-life microarray gene expression datasets and results are compared with various state-of-the-art techniques. Results obtained clearly illustrate that our approach extracts high-quality bi-clusters as compared to other methods and also it converges much faster than other competitors. Further, the obtained results are validated using statistical significance test and biological significance test.

Keywords

Bi-clustering Self-organizing map (SOM) Multi-objective optimization (MOO) Differential evolution (DE) Polynomial mutation Non-dominated sorting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Sriparna Saha would like to acknowledge the support of SERB Women in Excellence Award-SB/WEA-08/2017 for conducting this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Acharya S, Saha S, Sahoo P (2019) Bi-clustering of microarray data using a symmetry-based multi-objective optimization framework. Soft Comput 23(14):5693–5714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angiulli F, Pizzuti C (2005) Gene expression biclustering using random walk strategies. In: International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. Springer, pp 509– 519Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandyopadhyay S, Saha S, Maulik U, Deb K (2008) A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: Amosa. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(3):269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Dor A, Chor B, Karp R, Yakhini Z (2003) Discovering local structure in gene expression data: the order-preserving submatrix problem. J Comput Biol 10(3-4):373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bousselmi M, Bechikh S, Hung CC, Said LB (2017) Bi-mock: A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for bi-clustering with automatic determination of the number of bi-clusters. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, pp 366–376Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakraborty A, Maka H (2005) Biclustering of gene expression data using genetic algorithm. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2005. CIBCB’05. Proceedings of the 2005. IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng Y, Church GM (2000) Biclustering of expression data. In: Ismb, vol 8, pp 93–103Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das S, Abraham A, Konar A (2008) Automatic clustering using an improved differential evolution algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A: Syst Hum 38(1):218–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deb K, Tiwari S (2008) Omni-optimizer: a generic evolutionary algorithm for single and multi-objective optimization. Eur J Oper Res 185(3):1062–1087MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Divina F, Aguilar-Ruiz JS (2007) A multi-objective approach to discover biclusters in microarray data. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, pp 385–392Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Getz G, Levine E, Domany E (2000) Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(22):12,079–12,084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartigan JA (1972) Direct clustering of a data matrix. J Amer Stat Assoc 67(337):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Barkai N (2004) Defining transcription modules using large-scale gene expression data. Bioinformatics 20(13):1993–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Inc, Prentice-HallzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jia Y, Li Y, Liu W, Dong H (2016) An efficient weighted biclustering algorithm for gene expression data. In: 2016 17Th international conference on parallel and distributed computing, applications and technologies (PDCAT). IEEE, pp 336–341Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohonen T (1998) The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 21(1):1–6MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maulik U, Mukhopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay S (2009) Finding multiple coherent biclusters in microarray data using variable string length multiobjective genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(6):969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saini N, Chourasia S, Saha S, Bhattacharyya P (2017) A self organizing map based multi-objective framework for automatic evolution of clusters. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, pp 672–682Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seridi K, Jourdan L, Talbi EG (2015) Using multiobjective optimization for biclustering microarray data. Appl Soft Comput 33:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suresh K, Kundu D, Ghosh S, Das S, Abraham A (2009) Data clustering using multi-objective differential evolution algorithms. Fund Inf 97(4):381–403MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanay A, Sharan R, Shamir R (2002) Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data. Bioinformatics 18(suppl_1):S136–S144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teng L, Chan LW (2006) Biclustering gene expression profiles by alternately sorting with weighted correlated coefficient. In: 2006. Proceedings of the 2006 16th IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing. IEEE, pp 289–294Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vesterstrom J, Thomsen R (2004) A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems. In: IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation, vol 2, pp 1980–1987Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Welch BL (1947) The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved, vol 34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2332510
  26. 26.
    Yang J, Wang H, Wang W, Yu P (2003) Enhanced biclustering on expression data. In: Proceedings. 2003. Third IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and bioengineering. IEEE, pp 321–327Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang D, Wei B (2014) Comparison between differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithms. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and automation (ICMA). IEEE, pp 239–244Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang H, Zhang X, Gao XZ, Song S (2016a) Self-organizing multiobjective optimization based on decomposition with neighborhood ensemble, vol 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang H, Zhou A, Song S, Zhang Q, Gao XZ, Zhang J (2016b) A self-organizing multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(5):792–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology PatnaPatnaIndia

Personalised recommendations