A spatio-semantic approach to reasoning about agricultural processes
- 84 Downloads
Digitization of agricultural processes is advancing fast as telemetry data from the involved machines becomes more and more available. Current approaches commonly have a machine-centric view that does not account for machine-machine or machine-environment relations. In this paper we demonstrate how to model such relations in the generic semantic mapping framework SEMAP. We describe how SEMAP’s core ontology is extended to represent knowledge about the involved machines and facilities in a typical agricultural domain. In the framework we combine different information layers – semantically annotated spatial data, semantic background knowledge and incoming sensor data – to derive qualitative spatial facts and continuously track them to generate process states and events about the ongoing logistic process of a harvesting campaign, which adds to an increased process understanding.
KeywordsSemantic mapping Environment modeling Ontologies Agriculture
Work by Deeken is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research in the SOFiA project (Grant No. 01FJ15028). Work by Wiemann is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the framework of the BonaRes-initiative, project SoilAssist2 (Grant No. 031B0684D). The DFKI Osnabrück branch is supported by the state of Niedersachsen (VW-Vorab).
The support is gratefully acknowledged.
- 2.Barbieri DF, Braga D, Ceri S, Della Valle E, Grossniklaus M (2009) C-sparql: Sparql for continuous querying. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, pp 1061–1062Google Scholar
- 4.Bechhofer S (2009) Owl: Web ontology language. In: Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, pp 2008–2009Google Scholar
- 5.Borrmann A, Rank E (2008) Topological operators in a 3d spatial query language for building information models. In: Proceedings of the 12th International conference on computing in civil and building engineering (ICCCBE)Google Scholar
- 6.Daniele L, Ferreira Pires L (2013) An ontological approach to logistics. In: Enterprise interoperability, research and applications in the service-oriented ecosystem, IWEI 13. ISTE Ltd. WileyGoogle Scholar
- 9.Garbacz P, Trypuz R (2017) Representation of tensed relations in owl. In: Research conference on metadata and semantics research. Springer, pp 62–73Google Scholar
- 10.Hoxha J, Scheuermann A, Bloehdorn S (2010) An approach to formal and semantic representation of logistics services. In: 19th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2010) Proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Logistics (AILog), Lisbon, pp 73–78Google Scholar
- 13.Lauer J, Richter L, Ellersiek T, Zipf A (2014) Teleagro+: Analysis framework for agricultural telematics data. In: 7Th ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on computational transportation science, IWCTS ’14. ACM, pp 47–53Google Scholar
- 14.Mark TB, Whitacre B, Griffin T et al (2015) Assessing the value of broadband connectivity for big data and telematics: Technical efficiency. In: 2015 annual meeting. Southern Agricultural Economics Association, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Nüchter A, Hertzberg J (2008) Towards semantic maps for mobile robots. Robotics and Autonomous SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 16.Pfeiffer D, Blank S (2015) Real-time operator performance analysis in agricultural equipment. In: 73rd international conference on agricultural engineering (AgEng), pp 6–7Google Scholar
- 19.Wolter D, Wallgrün JO (2010) Qualitative spatial reasoning for applications: New challenges and the sparq toolbox. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar