Applied Intelligence

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 196–207 | Cite as

A linked open data based system utilizing structured open innovation process for addressing collaboratively public concerns in regional societies

  • Teemu Tossavainen
  • Shun Shiramatsu
  • Tadachika Ozono
  • Toramatsu Shintani
Article

Abstract

Regional governments are looking for ways to address public concerns more efficiently by utilizing eGovernment systems. The complex environment presents problems for situational awareness and cooperation in public spheres. Current solutions are either lacking in structuring the information or do not support collaboration or discovery. We addressed the problem by developing an open innovation process based web platform for gathering public issues, forming public goals, and for structuring concrete subgoals as goal trees to facilitate participation. We use SOCIA ontology to structure goal information as linked open data. We calculate similarity between a pair of goals by utilizing the tree like structured goal relations. We implemented a negotiation user interface on a video conferencing platform to facilitate interorganizational cooperation and conflict resolution. We are arranging workshops and using the system in various hackathon events to evaluate and analyze the system in real life situations and to gather real life data. We provide the implemented system as a free to use tool.

Keywords

Linked open data Public collaboration Conflict resolution Goal matching service 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    The World Bank: age dependency ratio, old (% of working-age population). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.DPND.OL/countries (2013)
  3. 3.
    Tossavainen T, Shiramatsu S, Ozono T, Shintani T (2013) Implementing a system enabling open innovation by sharing public goals based on linked open data. In: Modern advances in applied intelligence. 27th international conference on industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2014, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, June 3-6, 2014, Proceedings, Part II. Volume 8482 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, pp 98–108Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiramatsu S, Tossavainen T, Ozono T, Shintani T (2014) A goal matching service for facilitating public collaboration using linked open data. In: Electronic participation. Proceedings of the 6th IFIP WG 8.5 International conference, ePart 2014. Volume 8654 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, pp 114–127Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sb, Rose J, Flak S (2008) The shape of eparticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Govern Inf Q 25(3):400–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong W, Fu W (2012) One piece at a time: why video-based communication is better for negotiation and conflict resolution. In: CSCW ’12 proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer, pp 167–176Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    AGI Goldratt Institute: The theory of constraints and its thinking processes - a brief introduction to toc. http://www.goldratt.com/pdfs/toctpwp.pdf (2009)
  8. 8.
    (2008). Project Management Institute: a guide to the project management body of knowledge, 4th edn. Project Management InstituteGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng J, Shigekawa K, Meguro K, Yamazaki F, Nakagawa I, Hayashi H, Tamura K (2009) Applying the toc logistic process to clarify the problem schemes of near-field earthquake in tokyo metropolitan area. J Social Safety Sci 11:225–233. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohara M, Kondo S, Kou T, Numada M, Meguro K (2011) Overview of social issues after the Great East-Japan earthquake disaster - part 3 of activity reports of 3.11net Tokyo. SEISAN KENKYU 63(6):749–754. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiramatsu S, Ozono T, Shintani T (2013) Approaches to assessing public concerns: building linked data for public goals and criteria extracted from textual content. In: Electronic participation. Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference, ePart 2013. Volume 8075 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, pp 109–121Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    King SF, Brown P (2007) Fix my street or else: using the internet to voice local public service concerns. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, pp 72–80Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roth AE, Sotomayor MAO (1990) Two-sided matching: a study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis. Number 18 in econometric society monographs. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shiramatsu S, Ozono T, Shintani T (2015) Linked open data of context behind local concerns for supporting public participation. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 6(2):268–277Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teemu Tossavainen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shun Shiramatsu
    • 1
  • Tadachika Ozono
    • 1
  • Toramatsu Shintani
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringNagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.School of ScienceAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations