Applied Intelligence

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 291–301 | Cite as

A specification language for organisational performance indicators

Open Access


A specification language for performance indicators and their relations and requirements is presented and illustrated for a case study in logistics. The language can be used in different forms, varying from informal, semiformal, graphical to formal. A software environment has been developed that supports the specification process and can be used to automatically check whether performance indicators or relations between them or certain requirements over them are satisfied in a given organisational process.


Performance indicator Organisation Requirement Language 


  1. Bosse T, Jonker CM, Treur J (2004) Analysis of design process dynamics. In: Lopez de Mantaras R, Saitta L (eds) Proceedings of the 16th European conference on artificial intelligence, ECAI'04, pp 293–297Google Scholar
  2. Brazier FMT, van Langen PHG, Treur J (1996) A logical theory of design. In: Gero JS (ed) Advances in formal design methods for CAD, Proceedings of the second international workshop on formal methods in design. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 243–266Google Scholar
  3. Brewer PC, Speh TW (2000) Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. J Bus Log 21(1):75–93Google Scholar
  4. Chan FTS (2003) Performance measurement in a supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(7):534–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management: Strategies for reducing cost and improving service, 2nd edn. Financial Times/Prentice-Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis AM (1993) Software requirements: Objects, functions, and states. Prentice Hall, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Delfmann W, Albers S, Gehring M (2002) The impact of electronic commerce on logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distr Log Manag 32:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herlea Damian DE, Jonker CM, Treur J, Wijngaards NJE (2005) Integration of behavioural requirements specification within compositional knowledge engineering. Knowl-Based Syst J 18:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ittner CD, Larcker DF (2003) Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harv Bus Rev 81(11):88–96Google Scholar
  10. Kleijnen JPC, Smits MT (2003) Performance metrics in supply chain management. J Oper Res Soc 54(5):507–514MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kontonya G, Sommerville I (1998) Requirements engineering: processes and techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Krauth E, Moonen H, Popova V, Schut M (2005) Performance measurement and control in logistics service providing. The Icfaian J Manag Res IV(7):7–19Google Scholar
  13. van Langen PHG (2002) The anatomy of design: foundations, models and application. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Lemoine W, Dagnaes L (2003) Globalisation strategies and business organisation of a network of logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distr Log Manag 33(3):209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15:80–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sommerville I, Sawyer P (1997) Requirements engineering: a good practice guide. John Wiley & Sons, Chicester, EnglandMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Sowa JF (1984) Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Sowa JF, Dietz D (1999) Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations, Brooks/ColeGoogle Scholar
  19. Vaidyanathan G (January 2005) A framework for evaluating third-party logistics. Comm ACM 48(1):89–94Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Artificial IntelligenceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations