The Healthcare Triple Aim in the Recovery Era
Recovery is the guiding vision of mental health systems and policy. However, skepticism has emerged about whether the paradigm can achieve its sought goals. We argue that embedding recovery within a quality improvement framework, such as the Triple Aim, would increase leverage for systems change and advance recovery practice. The Triple Aim’s goals of improving healthcare outcomes, quality, and costs are pertinent to mental health systems, although action is also needed to address the social determinants of health. Accordingly, we propose the recovery-oriented Triple Aim, which could be used to guide policy development and evaluation of mental health services.
KeywordsRecovery Healthcare triple aim Mental health policy Serious mental illness
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Subjects/Animals
This article does not contain any research conducted by the authors involving human participants or animals.
This article did not involve any participants who required informed consent.
- Barrett, B., Young, M. S., Teague, G. B., Winarski, J. T., Moore, K. A., & Ochsorn, E. (2010). Recovery orientation of treatment, consumer empowerment, and satisfaction with services: A mediation model. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal,34, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.2975/34.2.2010.153.156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braslow, J. T. (2013). The manufacture of recovery. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,9, 781–809. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davidson, L., Rowe, M., Tondora, J., O’Connell, M. J., & Lawless, M. S. (2008). A practical guide to recovery-oriented practice: Tools for transforming mental health care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- De Hert, M., Correll, C. U., Bobes, J., Cetkovich-Bakmas, M., Cohen, D., Asai, I., et al. (2011). Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry,10, 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00014.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellison, M. L., Belanger, L. K., Niles, B. L., Evans, L. C., & Bauer, M. S. (2018). Explication and definition of mental health recovery: A systematic review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,45, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farmanova, E., Kirvan, C., Verma, J., Mukerji, G., Akunov, N., Phillips, K., et al. (2016). Triple aim in Canada: Developing capacity to lead to better health, care and cost. International Journal for Quality in Health Care,28, 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Government of Ontario. (2019). A healthy Ontario: Building a sustainable health care system, 2nd report from the premier’s council on improving healthcare and ending hallway medicine. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
- Green, C. A., Perrin, N. A., Leo, M. C., Janoff, S. L., Yarborough, B. J. H., & Paulson, R. I. (2013). Recovery from serious mental illness: Trajectories, characteristics, and the role of mental health care. Psychiatric Services,64, 1203–1210. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mery, G., Majumder, S., Brown, A., & Dobrow, M. J. (2017). What do we mean when we talk about the triple aim? A systematic review of evolving definition and adaptations of the framework at the health system level. Health Policy,121, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell, A. J., Malone, D., & Doebbeling, C. C. (2009). Quality of medical care for people with and without comorbid mental illness and substance misuse: Systematic review of comparative studies. British Journal of Psychiatry,194, 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Health Service. (2014). NHS five year forward view. Retrieved June 14, 2019 from https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-five-year-forward-view/.
- National Health Service. (2017). Next steps on the NHS five year forward view. Retrieved June 14, 2019 from https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/next-steps-on-the-nhs-five-year-forward-view/.
- New Zealand Minister of Health. (2016). New Zealand health strategy: Future directions. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
- Obucina, M., Harris, N., Fitzgerald, J. A., Chai, A., Radford, K., Ross, A., et al. (2018). The application of triple aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review. Health Policy,122, 900–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pincus, H. A., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Sara, G., Goldner, E. M., Prince, P. N., Ramanuj, P., et al. (2016). A review of mental health recovery programs in selected industrialized countries. International Journal of Mental Health Systems,10, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0104-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tepper, M. C., Cohen, A. M., Progovac, A. M., Ault-Brutus, A., Leff, H. S., Mullin, B., et al. (2017). Mind the gap: Developing an integrated behavioral health home to address health disparities in serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services,68, 1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Weeghel, J., van Zelst, C., Boertien, D., & Hasson-Ohayon, I. (2019). Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal,42, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar