Advertisement

Prevalence and Quality of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Supported Employment in the United States

  • Annalee Johnson-Kwochka
  • Gary R. Bond
  • Deborah R. Becker
  • Robert E. Drake
  • Mary Ann Greene
Original Article

Abstract

The individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment for people with serious mental illness is an evidence-based practice. Factors including a national learning community promoting IPS and enforcement of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision have spurred the growth of IPS nationwide. In this study we first evaluated the national prevalence and quality of IPS programs. We then evaluated the impact of learning community membership and Olmstead settlements on IPS program penetration and quality across the United States. We interviewed representatives from 48 state behavioral health agencies and 51 state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Survey questions examined the number of IPS programs in each state, the presence of an Olmstead settlement mandating employment services for people with serious mental illness, and the presence of three indicators of quality in IPS programs: collaboration between state behavioral health and vocational rehabilitation agencies, regular, independent fidelity monitoring, and technical assistance and training for IPS programs. Respondents from 38 (75%) states, including 19 states in the IPS Learning Community and 19 outside the learning community, reported a total of 523 IPS programs nationwide (M = 14, SD = 16). The state IPS program penetration rate (number of IPS programs per 1,000,000 people) ranged from 0.05 to 16.62 (M = 3.61, SD = 3.62) among states with IPS. The penetration rate was similar for learning community and non-learning community states with IPS, but learning community states were much more likely than non-learning community states with IPS to report the presence of each of three quality indicators. Eleven states reported Olmstead or other settlements that positively impacted employment services for people with serious mental illness, but among the 38 states with IPS programs, Olmstead states did not differ from non-Olmstead states in IPS program penetration or on the quality indicators. Nationally, most states provide IPS programs, but the within-state penetration rate and quality of implementation vary widely. While learning community and non-learning community states with IPS do not differ in the prevalence of IPS programs, learning community states are much more likely to report key quality indicators, which may enhance these states’ potential for sustaining and expanding IPS. Olmstead settlements have not yet shown a direct impact on the penetration and quality of IPS, but as the Department of Justice continues to enforce the Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision, their significance may increase.

Keywords

Individual placement and support (IPS) Supported employment Serious mental illness Prevalence Quality 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by H133B140028 from the National Institute of Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Ms. Johnson-Kwochka declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Bond declares he has no conflict of interest. Ms. Becker declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Drake declares he has no conflict of interest. Ms. Greene declares she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H., Hecht, D. B., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: Evidence for a protective effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 270–280.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Bond, G. R. (2014). The IPS supported employment learning collaborative. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 37, 79–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Vogler, K. M. (1997). A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 265–284.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (2014). Making the case for IPS supported employment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41, 69–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., & Noel, V. A. (2016). The IPS learning community: A longitudinal study of sustainment, quality, and outcome. Psychiatric Services, 67, 864–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, G. R., Peterson, A. E., Becker, D. R., & Drake, R. E. (2012). Validating the revised individual placement and support fidelity scale (IPS-25). Psychiatric Services, 63, 758–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. D., Barrett, A., Ireys, H., Caffery, E., & Hourihan, K. (2012). Evidence-based practices for Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Washington, DC: Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  8. Bruns, E. J., Kerns, S. E., Pullmann, M. D., Hensley, S. W., Lutterman, T., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2016). Research, data, and evidence-based treatment use in state behavioral health systems, 2001–2012. Psychiatric Services, 67, 496–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnim, I. (2015). The promise of the Americans with Disabilities Act for people with mental illness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 313, 2223–2224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, P. A., Santos, A. B., Hiott, D. W., Schoenwald, S., & Dias, J. K. (1995). Dissemination of assertive community treatment teams. Psychiatric Services, 46, 676–678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., Goldman, H. H., & Martinez, R. A. (2006). Best practices: The Johnson & Johnson—Dartmouth Community Mental Health Program: Disseminating evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57, 302–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., Goldman, H. H., Hogan, M. F., & Karakus, M. (2016). Individual Placement and Support services boost employment for people with serious mental illness, but funding is lacking. Health Affairs, 35, 1098–1105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K. T., & Torrey, W. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52, 179–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnerty, M. T., Rapp, C. A., Bond, G. R., Lynde, D. W., Ganju, V. J., & Goldman, H. H. (2009). The State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY). Community Mental Health Journal, 45, 228–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganju, V. (2003). Implementation of evidence-based practices in state mental health systems: Implications for research and effectiveness studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 125–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S. J., Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Swanson, S. J., & Reese, S. L. (2015). Predictive validity of the individual placement and support fidelity scale (IPS-25): A replication study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lutterman, T. (2015). Supported employment services provided by state mental health systems. Paper presented at the Employment Symposium for SMHA Executives, Omaha, Nebraska.Google Scholar
  18. Margolies, P. J., Broadway-Wilson, K., Gregory, R., Jewell, T. C., Scannevin, G., Myers, R. W., ... Dixon, L. B. (2015). Use of learning collaboratives by the center for practice innovations to bring IPS to scale in New York state. Psychiatric Services, 66, 4–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marshall, T., Goldberg, R. W., Braude, L., Dougherty, R. H., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., … Delphin-Rittmon, M. E. (2014). Supported employment: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65, 16–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenheck, R. A., Leslie, D., Keefe, R., McEvoy, J., Swartz, M., Perkins, D., … Lieberman, J. (2006). Barriers to employment for people with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 411–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Salkever, D. S., Karakus, M. C., Slade, E. P., Harding, C. M., Hough, R. L., Rosenheck, R. A., … Yamada, A. M. (2007). Measures and predictors of community-based employment and earnings of persons with schizophrenia in a multisite study. Psychiatric Services, 58, 315–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Salyers, M. P., McKasson, M., Bond, G. R., McGrew, J. H., Rollins, A. L., & Boyle, C. (2007). The role of technical assistance centers in implementing evidence-based practices: Lessons learned. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White, D. A., Luther, L., Bonfils, K. A., & Salyers, M. P. (2015). Essential components of early intervention programs for psychosis: Available intervention services in the United States. Schizophrenia Research, 168, 79–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annalee Johnson-Kwochka
    • 1
  • Gary R. Bond
    • 1
  • Deborah R. Becker
    • 1
  • Robert E. Drake
    • 1
  • Mary Ann Greene
    • 2
  1. 1.The IPS Employment CenterWestat, Inc.LebanonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical Data SciencesGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations