Advertisement

The Consistencies and Vagaries of the Washington State Inventory of Evidence-Based Practice: The Definition of “Evidence-Based” in a Policy Context

  • Sarah Cusworth Walker
  • Aaron R. Lyon
  • Steve Aos
  • Eric W. Trupin
Original Paper

Abstract

As states increasingly establish the importance of evidence-based practice through policy and funding mandates, the definition of evidence-based practice can have a significant impact on investment decisions. Not meeting established criteria can mean a loss of funding for established programs and the implementation disruption of programs without a strong research base. Whether the definition of “evidence-based” is influenced by these high stakes contexts is an interesting question that can inform the larger field about the value and utility of evidence-based practice lists/inventories for disseminating knowledge. In this paper we review the development of the Washington State Inventory of Evidence-Based, Research-Based and Promising Practices as a case study for the process of defining evidence-based practice in a policy context. As part of this study we also present a comparison of other well-known evidence-based practice inventories and examine consistencies and differences in the process of identifying and developing program ratings.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice Inventories Policy 

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Fettes, D. L., Hurlburt, M. S., Palinkas, L. A., Gunderson, L., Willging, C. E., & Chaffin, M. J. (2014). Collaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency-collaborative teams to scale-up evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services, 38(1), 4–23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
  3. Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia: Washington State Institute of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Beidas, R. S., Edmunds, J., Ditty, M., Watkins, J., Walsh, L., Marcus, S., & Kendall, P. (2013). Are inner context factors related to implementation outcomes in cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2.Google Scholar
  5. Bernal, G., Jimenez-Chafey, M. I., & Domenech Rodriguez, M. M. (2009). Cultural adaptation of treatments: A resource for considering culture in evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BigFoot, D. S., & Funderburk, B. W. (2011). Honoring children, making relatives: The cultural translation of parent-child interaction therapy for American Indian and Alaska Native families. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 43(4), 309–318. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2011.628924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumbarger, B., & Campbell, E. (2012). A state agency-university partnership for translational research and the dissemination of evidence-based prevention and intervention. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(4), 268–277. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0372-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambless, D., & Ollendick, T. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett Johnson, S., & Pope, K. S. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  10. Chorpita, B., Daleiden, E., & Weisz, J. (2005). Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: A distillation and matching model. Mental Health Services Research, 7(1), 5–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Echo-Hawk, H. (2011). Indigenous communities and evidence building. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 43(4), 269–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Embry, D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 75–113. doi: 10.1007/s10567-008-0036-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.Google Scholar
  14. Flaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008). Unpacking prevention capacity: An intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 182–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasgow, R. E., Green, L. W., Klesges, L. M., Abrams, D. B., Fisher, E. B., Goldstein, M. G., & Orleans, C. T. (2006). External validity: We need to do more. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(2), 105–108. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3102_1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glick, B. G. A. P. (1987). Aggression replacement training. JCAD Journal of Counseling & Development, 65(7), 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guyatt, G., Rennie, D., Meade, M., & Cook, D. (2008). Preface to users’ guides to the medical literature. In Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. http://jamaevidence.com/resource/preface/520.
  18. Hawkins, J., & Catalano, F. (1992). Communities that care: Action for drug abuse prevention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 821–833.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoagwood, K. E., Olin, S. S., Horwitz, S., Cleek, A., Gleacher, A., Lewandowski, E., & Hogan, M. (2014). Scaling up evidence-based practices for children and families in New York State: Toward evidence-based policies on implementation for state mental health systems. Journal of Child Clinical and Adolescent Psychology, 43(2), 145–157. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.869749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howland, R. H. (2011). What you see depends on where you’re looking and how you look at it: Publication bias and outcome reporting bias. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 49(8), 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larios, S. E., Wright, S., Jernstrom, A., Lebron, D., & Sorensen, J. L. (2011). Evidence-based practices, attitudes, and beliefs in substance abuse treatment programs serving American Indians and Alaska Natives: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 43(4), 355–359. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2011.629159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lau, A. S. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments: Examples from parent training. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 13(4), 295–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00042.x.Google Scholar
  24. Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University. http://cjjr.georgetown.edu/pdfs/ebp/ebppaper.pdf.Google Scholar
  25. Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., & Tidd, S. T. (2007). The standardized program evaluation protocol (SPEP): A practical approach to evaluating and improving juvenile justice programs in North Carolina. Final evaluation report. Nashville: Vanderbilt University, Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology.Google Scholar
  26. Lyon, A. R., Lau, A. S., McCauley, E., Vander Stoep, A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2014). A case for modular design: Implications for implementing evidence-based interventions with culturally diverse youth. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 57–66. doi: 10.1037/a0035301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McHugh, R. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: A review of current efforts. American Psychologist, 65(2), 73–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mihalic Sf, F. A. A. A. S. (2008). Implementing the life skills Training drug prevention program: Factors related to implementation fidelity (p. 3). Implementation Science: IS.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, D. (2013). Aggression replacement training: A comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth. School of Social Work Journal, 37(2), 113–114.Google Scholar
  30. Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., & York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(2), 123–157. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24–34. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubin, A. (2008). Practitioner’s guide to using research for evidence-based practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Sackett, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based medicine : How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  34. Sánchez-Meca, J. M., Marin-Martinez, F., & Chacon-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 448–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sawyer, A. M., & Borduin, C. M. (2011). Effects of multisystemic therapy through midlife: A 21.9-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial with serious and violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 643–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoenwald, S. K., Chapman, J. E., Henry, D. B., & Sheidow, A. J. (2012). Taking effective treatments to scale: Organizational effects on outcomes of multisystemic therapy for youths with co-occurring substance use. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2012.636684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 3–4.Google Scholar
  38. Washington State Institue for Public Policy (WSIPP). (2014). Benefit-cost technical documentation. Olympia, WA. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/TechnicalDocumentation/WsippBenefitCostTechnicalDocumentation.pdf.
  39. Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Miranda, J., Bearman, S. K., & Gibbons, R. D. (2012). Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: A randomized effectiveness trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(3), 274–282. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Cusworth Walker
    • 1
  • Aaron R. Lyon
    • 1
  • Steve Aos
    • 2
  • Eric W. Trupin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Washington State Institute for Public PolicyOlympiaUSA

Personalised recommendations