Advertisement

The “Critical” Elements of Illness Management and Recovery: Comparing Methodological Approaches

  • Alan B. McGuireEmail author
  • Lauren Luther
  • Dominique White
  • Laura M. White
  • John McGrew
  • Michelle P. Salyers
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined three methodological approaches to defining the critical elements of Illness Management and Recovery (IMR), a curriculum-based approach to recovery. Sixty-seven IMR experts rated the criticality of 16 IMR elements on three dimensions: defining, essential, and impactful. Three elements (Recovery Orientation, Goal Setting and Follow-up, and IMR Curriculum) met all criteria for essential and defining and all but the most stringent criteria for impactful. Practitioners should consider competence in these areas as preeminent. The remaining 13 elements met varying criteria for essential and impactful. Findings suggest that criticality is a multifaceted construct, necessitating judgments about model elements across different criticality dimensions.

Keywords

Critical elements Fidelity Illness management and recovery Implementation Severe mental illness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a grant from the VA HSR&D: RRP 11-017 and the National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH096835). Dr. McGuire is supported by a Grant from VA RR&D: D0712-W and by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (CIN 13-416). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or NIMH.

References

  1. Baer, J. S., Ball, S. A., Campbell, B. K., Miele, G. M., Schoener, E. P., & Tracy, K. (2007). Training and fidelity monitoring of behavioral interventions in multi-site addictions research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87(2–3), 107–118. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.028.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellack, A. S. (2004). Skills training for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using Program Theory in Evaluation (pp. 5–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, G. R. (1991). Variations in an assertive outreach model. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 52, 65–80. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319915207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, G. R. (2004). Supported employment: evidence for an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 345–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. W. (2000a). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2(2), 75–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, G. R., & Salyers, M. P. (2004). Prediction of outcome from the Darthmouth assesrtive community treatment fidelty scale. CNS Spectrums, 9(12), 932–942.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, G. R., Williams, J., Evans, L., Salyers, M., Kim, H. W., Sharpe, H., & Leff, H. S. (2000b). Psychiatric rehabilitation fidelity toolkit. Cambridge: Human Services Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(40), 1–9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Day, A. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsch, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson, P. R., & Parker, K. C. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon, L., McFarlane, W. R., Lefley, H., Lucksted, A., Cohen, M., Falloon, I., & Sondheimer, D. (2001). Evidence-based practices for services to families of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Services, 52(7), 903–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K. T., & Torrey, W. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52(2), 179–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Färdig, R., Lewander, T., Melin, L., Folke, F., Fredriksson, A. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of the illness management and recovery program for persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 62(6), 606–612. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.6.606.
  18. Haddock, G., Devane, S., Bradshaw, T., McGovern, J., Tarrier, N., Kinderman, P., & Harris, N. (2001). An investigation into the psychometric properties of the cognitive therapy scale for psychosis (CTS-Psy). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasson-Ohayon, I., Roe, D., & Kravetz, S. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the illness management and recovery program. Psychiatric Services, 58(11), 1461–1466. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.11.1461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keith, R. E., Hopp, F. P., Subramanian, U., Wiitala, W., & Lowery, J. C. (2010). Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implementation Science, 5(1), 99. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koop, J. I., Rollins, A. L., Bond, G. R., Salyers, M. P., Dincin, J., Kinley, T., & Marcelle, K. (2004). Development of the DPA fidelity scale: Using fidelity to define an existing vocational model. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 28(1), 16–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurtz, M. M., Rose, J., & Wexler, B. E. (2011). Predictors of participation in community outpatient psychosocial rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Community Mental Health Journal, 47(6), 622–627. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9343-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice Training, 38(4), 357. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levitt, A. J., Mueser, K. T., DeGenova, J., Lorenzo, J., Bradford-Watt, D., Barbosa, A., & Chernick, M. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of illness management and recovery in multiple-unit supportive housing. Psychiatric Services, 60(12), 1629–1636. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.12.1629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marty, D., Rapp, C. A., & Carlson, L. (2001). The experts speak: the critical ingredients of strengths model case management. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(3), 214. doi: 10.1037/h0095090.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McEvoy, J. P., Scheifler, P. L., & Frances, A. (1999). The expert consensus guideline series: Treatment of schizophrenia 1999. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60(Supplement 11), 1–80.Google Scholar
  29. McGrew, J. H., & Bond, G. R. (1995). Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 113–125. doi: 10.1007/BF02518752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R., Dietzen, L. L., & Salyers, M. P. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 670–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrew, J. H., & Griss, M. E. (2005). Concurrent and predictive validity of two scales to assess the fidelity of implementation of supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 29(1), 41–47. doi: 10.2975/29.2005.41.47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGuire, A. B., & Bond, G. B. (2011). Critical elements of the crisis intervention team model of jail diversion: An expert survey. Behavioral Science and the Law, 29, 81–94. doi: 10.1002/bsl.941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuire, A. B., Kukla, M., Green, A., Gilbride, D., Mueser, K. T., & Salyers, M. P. (2014). Illness management and recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Services, 65(2), 171–179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200274.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGuire, A. B., Stull, L. G., Mueser, K. T., Santos, M., Mook, A., Rose, N., & Salyers, M. P. (2012). Development and reliability of a measure of clinician competence in providing illness management and recovery. Psychiatric Services, 63(8), 772–778. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michalak, J., & Holtforth, M. G. (2006). Where do we go from here? the goal perspective in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(4), 346–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00048.x.Google Scholar
  36. Mihalic, S. (2004). The importance of implementation fidelity. Report on Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 4(83–86), 99–105.Google Scholar
  37. Mowbray, C. T., Holder, M., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315–340. doi: 10.1177/109821400302400303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mueser, K. T., Corrigan, P. W., Hilton, D. W., Tanzman, B., Schaub, A., Gingerich, S., & Herz, M. I. (2002a). Illness management and recovery: A review of the research. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1272–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mueser, K. T., Gingerich, S. (2002). Illness Management and Recovery Implementation Resource Kit. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  40. Mueser, K. T., Gingerich, S., Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., & Williams, J. (2002b). Illness management and recovery fidelity scale. In K. T. Mueser & S. Gingerich (Eds.), Illness management and recovery implementation resource kit. Rockville: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  41. Mueser, K. T., Meyer, P. S., Penn, D. L., Clancy, R., Clancy, D. M., & Salyers, M. P. (2006). The illness management and recovery program: Rationale, development, and preliminary findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(1), 32–43. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perepletchikova, F., Treat, T. A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 829–841. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SAMHSA (2012). SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery: 10 guiding principles of recovery. (DHHS Publication No. PEP12-RECDEF). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  44. Schaedle, R., & Epstein, I. (2000). Specifying intensive case management: A multiple stakeholder approach. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 95–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sechrest, L., West, S. G., Phillips, M. A., Redner, R., & Yeaton, W. (1979). Some neglected problems in evaluation research: Strength and integrity of treatments. Evaluation studies review annual, 4, 15–35.Google Scholar
  46. Shapiro, F., & Solomon, R. M. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  47. Velligan, D. I., Diamond, P. M., Mintz, J., Maples, N., Li, X., Zeber, J., & Miller, A. L. (2008). The use of individually tailored environmental supports to improve medication adherence and outcomes in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(3), 483–493. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm111.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webb, C. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Barber, J. P. (2010). Therapist adherence/competence and treatment outcome: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 200–211. doi: 10.1037/a0018912.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright-Berryman, J., McGuire, A. B., & Salyers, M. P. (2011). A review of consumer-provided services on Assertive Community Treatment and intensive case management teatms: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 17(1), 37–44. doi: 10.1177/1078390310393283.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan B. McGuire
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Lauren Luther
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dominique White
    • 2
    • 3
  • Laura M. White
    • 2
    • 3
  • John McGrew
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michelle P. Salyers
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Roudebush VA Medical CenterIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIndiana University–Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.ACT Center of IndianaIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations