Connecting Science and Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Research

  • David A. Chambers
  • Beverly Pringle
  • Denise Juliano-Bult
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Collaboration between researchers and stakeholder groups is a potentially powerful mechanism for strengthening the quality of mental health research and for amplifying its public health impact. For stakeholders, collaboration offers opportunities to help shape research questions; participate in data collection and interpretation; and improve local capacity to access and use research findings. For researchers, collaboration can build understanding of what stakeholders want and need from research; enhance capacity to frame research questions and findings in language and metrics of value to stakeholders; and provide opportunities to contribute science-backed knowledge to decision-making processes in real world settings. Key stakeholder groups can include the recipients and providers of care, public and private care systems, health plans, schools, family service and faith-based organizations, correctional systems, and employers providing mental health benefits. This commentary reflects on the path that NIMH has taken in fostering researcher-stakeholder collaboration, particularly regarding child and adolescent mental health research. It describes the goals that NIMH set out to achieve, steps taken to realize those goals, lessons learned from those efforts, and possible next steps.

Keywords

Research partnership Collaborative research Community-based CBPR 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In J. Bemmel & A. T. McCray (Eds.), Yearbook of medical informatics (pp. 65–70). Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, P., Brown, C. H., Saldana, L., Reid, J., Wang, W., Marsenich, L., et al. (2008). Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in California. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 250–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung, B., Jones, L., Dixon, E. L., Miranda, J., Wells, K., & The Community Partners in Care Steering Council. (2010). Using a community partnered participatory research approach to implement a randomized controlled trial: Planning community partners in care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 780–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ginossar, T., & Nelson, S. (2010). Reducing the health and digital divides: A model for using community-based participatory research approach to e-health interventions in low-income Hispanic communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 530–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hardy, C. M., Wynn, T. A., Huckaby, F., Lisovicz, N., & White-Johnson, F. (2005). African American community health advisors trained as research partners. Family Community Health, 28, 28–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (2001). Community based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education for Health, 14, 182–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Ayers, W. A., & Rodgers, A. (1990). Empirical and clinical focus of child and adolescent psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 729–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liegghio, M., Nelson, G., & Evans, S. D. (2010). Partnering with children diagnosed with mental health issues: Contributions of a sociology of childhood perspective to participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 84–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mance, G. A., Mendleson, T., Byrd, B., Jones, J., & Tandon, S. (2010). Utilizing community based participatory research to adapt a mental health intervention for African American emerging adults. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 4(2), 131–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Merikangas, K. R., He, J., Brody, D., Fisher, P. W., Bourden, K., & Koretz, D. S. (2010a). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among U.S. children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics, 125(1), 75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merikangas, K. R., He, J., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., et al. (2010b). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(10), 980–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Advisory Mental Health Council. (2006). The road ahead: Research partnerships to transform services. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. May 12, 2006. Accessed at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups on 7 Oct 2011.
  13. NIMH. (2005). Interventions and Practice Research Infrastructure Support Program (R24). Accessed at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/par-06-441.html on 7 Oct 2011.
  14. Prilleltensky, I., Nelson, G., & Peirson, L. (2001). The role of power and control in children’s lives: An ecological analysis of pathways toward wellness, resilience, and problems. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shalowitz, M. U., Isacco, A., Barquin, N., Clark-Kauffman, E., Delger, P., Nelson, D., et al. (2009). Community-based participatory research: A review of the literature with strategies for community engagement. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 30, 350–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sherman, M. D. (2003). The Support and Family Education (SAFE) program: Mental health facts for families. Psychiatric Services, 54(1), 35–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tarrier, N. (2005). Cognitive behaviour therapy for schizophrenia—A review of development, evidence, and implementation. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74(3), 136–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taub, J. (2001). The effects of parent empowerment on adjustment for children receiving comprehensive mental health services. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research and Practice, 4(3), 103–122.Google Scholar
  19. Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for science and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., et al. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication 04–E022-2.Google Scholar
  21. Weisz, J. R., Hawley, K. M., & Doss, A. J. (2004). Empirically tested psychotherapies for youth internalizing and externalizing problems and disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(4), 729–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weisz, J. R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61, 671–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995). Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 450–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA)  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Chambers
    • 1
  • Beverly Pringle
    • 1
  • Denise Juliano-Bult
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Services and Intervention ResearchNational Institute of Mental HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations