Advertisement

Key processes, Ingredients and Components of Successful Systems Collaboration: Working with Severely Emotionally or Behaviorally Disturbed Children and Their Families

  • Mo Yee LeeEmail author
  • Barbra Teater
  • Gilbert J. Greene
  • Andrew D. Solovey
  • David Grove
  • J. Scott Fraser
  • Phil Washburn
  • Kai Shyang Hsu
Original Paper

Abstract

Systems collaboration has repeatedly been cited as a component of successful social service delivery. Through qualitative data, this study explored the process involved in inter-agency collaboration when providing Integrative Family and Systems Treatment (I-FAST) for families with severely emotionally or behaviorally disturbed children. Data were collected through a series of eight focus groups with 26 agency collaborators across 11 counties in Ohio. Data analysis revealed two emergent phenomena: the process of developing collaboration, consisting of making initial contact, a trial period and developing trust; and the key ingredients of collaboration, focusing on interpersonal and professional qualities. Implications of each theme are discussed.

Keywords

Systems collaboration Interagency collaboration I-FAST Trust Professional qualities 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from The Ohio Department of Mental Health, Grant #744832.

References

  1. Abramson, J. S., & Mizrahi, T. (2003). Understanding collaboration between social workers and physicians: applications of a typology. Social Work in Health Care, 37, 71–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson-Butcher, D., & Ashton, D. (2004). Innovative models of collaboration to serve children, youth, families and communities. Children & Schools, 26, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atlas.ti (2005). Atlas.ti 5.0. http://www.atlasti.com. Accessed 1 Dec 2010.
  4. Boyd-Franklin, N., & Bry, B. H. (2000). Reaching out in family therapy: home-based, school, A Middle Path 24 and community interventions. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Brandes, B. J., & Cheung, M. (2009). Supervision and treatment of juveniles with sexual behavior problems. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 26, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruns, E. J., Walker, J. S., Zabel, M., Matarese, M., Estep, K., Harburger, D., et al. (2010). Intervening in the lives of youth with complex behavioral health challenges and their families: the role of the wraparound process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 314–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Darlington, Y., & Feeney, J. A. (2008). Collaboration between mental health and child protection services: Professionals’ perceptions of best practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darlington, Y., Healy, K., & Feeney, J. A. (2010). Approaches to assessment and intervention across four types of child and family welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 356–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, S. D., & Piercy, F. P. (2007a). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part I: Model-dependent common factors across three models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 318–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, S. D., & Piercy, F. P. (2007b). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their former students say about change, part II: model-dependent common factors and an integrative framework. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 344–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond, G. S., Liddle, H. A., Wintersteen, M. B., Dennis, M. L., Godley, S. H., & Tims, F. (2006). Early therapeutic alliance as a predictor of treatment outcome for adolescent cannabis users in outpatient treatment. The American Journal of Addictions, 15, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feinstein, N. R., Fielding, K., Udvari-Solner, A., & Joshi, S. V. (2009). The supporting alliance in child and adolescent treatment: enhancing collaboration among therapists, parents, and teacher. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 63, 319–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitch, D. (2009). A shared point of access to facilitate interagency collaboration. Administration in Social Work, 33(2), 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, B. W., Lehman, W. E. K., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2009). Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 101, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraenkel, P. (2006). Engaging families as experts: collaborative family program development. Family Process, 45, 237–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraser, S., & Solovey, A. (2007). Second-order change in psychotherapy: the golden thread that unifies effective treatments. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser, J. S., Solovey, A. D., Grove, D., Lee, M. Y., & Greene, G. J. (2011). Integrative families in systems treatment: A middle path towards integrating common and specific factors in evidence based family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00228.x.
  20. Gannaway, J., Cook, N., & Freundlich, M. (2008). Broadening the array of services: integrating legal and social work services for youth and families. Journal of Community Practice, 16, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, L. (1999). Interprofessional care in South Africa: the expanding role of community pharmacy and the therapeutic alliance with nurses. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldsmith, J., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., Rodriguez, D., & Sanchez-Reilly, S. (2010). Interdisciplinary geriatric and palliative care team narratives: collaboration practices and barriers. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greene, G. J. (2002). The Mental Research Institute approach to strategic therapy. In A. R. Roberts & G. J. Greene (Eds.), Social workers’ desk reference (pp. 125–130). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Imber-Black, E. (1988). Families and larger systems: a family therapist’s guide through the labyrinth. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, L. N., Wright, D. W., & Ketring, S. A. (2002). The therapeutic alliance in home-based family therapy. Is it predictive of outcome? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kernan, J. B., & Morilus-Black, M. (2010). Social supports for youth and families. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 258–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kock, L., Egbert, N., & Coeling, H. (2005). The working alliance as a model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Work, 25, 369–373.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, H. A., & Barkdull, C. (2001). Gaining the collaborative advantage and promoting systems and cross-systems change. In A. L. Sallee, H. A. Lawson, & K. Briar-Lawson (Eds.), Innovative practices with vulnerable children and families (pp. 245–269). Dubuque: Eddie Bowers Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, M. Y., Greene, G. J., Hsu, K. S., Solovey, A., Grove, D., Fraser, J. S., et al. (2009). Utilizing family strengths and resilience: integrative family and systems treatment with children and adolescents with severe emotional and behavioral problems. Family Process, 48, 395–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: new directions for program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Madsen, W. C. (2007). Collaborative therapy with multi-stressed families (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nylen, U. (2007). Interagency collaboration in human services: impact of formalization and intensity on effectiveness. Public Administration, 85, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Pinsof, W. M. (1994). An integrative systems perspective on the therapeutic alliance: theoretical, clinical and research implications. In A. Horvath & L. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: theory, research and practice (pp. 173–198). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Schmied, V., Mills, A., Kruske, S., Kemp, L., Fowler, C., & Homer, C. (2010). The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and families. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sloper, P. (2004). Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services. Child: care, health and development, 30, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spath, R., Werrbach, G. B., & Pine, B. A. (2008). Sharing the baton, not passing it: Collaboration between public and private child welfare agencies to reunify families. Journal of Community Practice, 16, 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sprenkle, D. H., & Blow, A. J. (2007). The role of the therapist as the bridge between common factors and therapeutic change: more complex than congruency with a worldview. Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Torres, G. W., & Margolin, F. S. (2003). The collaboration primer: proven strategies considerations and tools to get you started. Chicago: Health Research and Educational Trust.Google Scholar
  42. Tracy, E. M., Biegel, D. E., Rebeck, A. C., & Johnsen, J. A. (2003). Intersystem collaboration: a statewide initiative to support families. Family Preservation Journal, 7, 79–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mo Yee Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbra Teater
    • 2
  • Gilbert J. Greene
    • 3
  • Andrew D. Solovey
    • 4
  • David Grove
    • 5
  • J. Scott Fraser
    • 6
  • Phil Washburn
    • 7
  • Kai Shyang Hsu
    • 8
  1. 1.College of Social WorkThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.University of BathBathUK
  3. 3.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Solution CounselingDublinUSA
  5. 5.Family Institute of ColumbusColumbusUSA
  6. 6.Wright State UniversityDaytonUSA
  7. 7.Thompkins Child and Adolescent CenterCirclevilleUSA
  8. 8.Chao Yang University of TechnologyTaichungPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations