A Collaborative Approach to Identifying Effective Incentives for Mental Health Clinicians to Improve Depression Care in a Large Managed Behavioral Healthcare Organization

  • Lisa S. Meredith
  • Robert B. Branstrom
  • Francisca Azocar
  • Ruth Fikes
  • Susan L. Ettner
Original Paper

Abstract

This descriptive study used stakeholder input to prioritize evidence-based strategies for improving depression care and to select incentives for mental health clinicians to adopt those strategies, and to conduct a feasibility test of an incentive-based program in a managed behavioral healthcare organization (MBHO). In two rounds of interviews and a stakeholder meeting, MBHO administrators and clinicians selected increasing combination treatment (antidepressant plus psychotherapy) rates as the program goal; and paying a bonus for case reviews, clinician feedback, and clinician education as incentives. We assessed program feasibility with case review and clinician surveys from a large independent practice association that contracts with the MBHO. Findings suggest that providing incentives for mental health clinicians is feasible and the incentive program did increase awareness. However, adoption may be challenging because of administrative barriers and limited clinical data available to MBHOs.

Keywords

Provider behavior change Incentives Mental health services Depression Quality improvement 

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bailit Health Purchasing and Sixth Man Consulting. (March 2002). The Growing Case for Using Physician Incentives to Improve Health Care Quality, the National Health Care Purchasing Institute, December 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, C. L., & Frank, R. G. (2006). Commentary: An economic perspective on implementing evidence-based depression care. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 21–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremer, R. W., Scholle, S. H., Keyser, D., Houtsinger, J. V., & Pincus, H. A. (2008). Pay for performance in behavioral health. Psychiatric Services, 59(12), 1419–1429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalkey, N. D. (1967). Delphi. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Dalkey, N. D. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1995). Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 700–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., Williams, J. W., Jr., Kroenke, K., Schulberg, H. C., Bruce, M., et al. (2004). Going to scale: Re-engineering systems for primary care treatment of depression. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(4), 301–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, M. D., Ong, M. K., Lee, D. L., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (2006). Realigning economic incentives for depression care at UCSF. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 34–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984). Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74(9), 979–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank, R. G., Huskamp, H. A., & Pincus, H. A. (2003). Aligning incentives in the treatment of depression in primary care with evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 54(5), 682–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, E., Novick, D., & Kupfer, D. J. (2006). Antidepressants and psychotherapy: A clinical research review. Focus, 7, 263–272.Google Scholar
  14. Grazier, K. L., & Klinkman, M. S. (2006). The economics of integrated depression care: The University of Michigan study. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 16–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HealthCare Benchmarks and Quality Improvement. (2004). Leapfrog offers web-based compendium of incentives [Electronic Version]. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NUZ/is_9_11/ai_n6179865. Retrieved December 15, 2008 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NUZ/is_9_11/ai_n6179865.
  16. Helmer, D. (1966). Social technology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hohman, A. A., & Shear, K. M. (2002). Community-based Intervention Research: Coping with the “Noise” of Real Life in Study Design. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jindal, R. D., & Thase, M. E. (2005). Integrating psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy to improve outcomes among patients with mood disorders. Focus, 3, 114–121.Google Scholar
  20. Katon, W., Robinson, P., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Bush, T., Ludman, E., et al. (1996). A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(10), 924–932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Katon, W., Unützer, J., Fan, M. Y., Williams, J. W., Jr., Schoenbaum, M., Lin, E. H., et al. (2006). Cost-effectiveness and net benefit of enhanced treatment of depression for older adults with diabetes and depression. Diabetes Care, 29(2), 265–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Walker, E., Simon, G. E., Bush, T., et al. (1995). Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(13), 1026–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller, M. B., McCullough, J. P., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B., Dunner, Dl, Gelenberg, et al. (2000). A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, their combination for the treatment of chronic depression. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1462–1470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klerman, G. L., Weissman, M. M., Markowitz, J., et al. (1994). Medication and psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaivor change. Raven: New York.Google Scholar
  25. Korsen, N., Scott, P., Dietrich, A. J., & Oxman, T. (2003). Implementing an office system to improve primary care management of depression. Psychiatric Quarterly, 74(1), 45–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Labby, D., Spofford, M., Robison, J., & Ralston, R. (2006). The economics of depression in primary care: De-fragmentation in the Oregon Medicaid market. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 39–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Creating partnership synergy: The critical role of community stakeholders. Journal of Health Services Administration, 26, 119–139.Google Scholar
  28. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Meredith, L. S., Jackson-Triche, M. D. N., Rubenstein, L. V., Camp, P., & Wells, K. B. (2000). Quality improvement for depression enhances long-term treatment knowledge for primary care clinicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(12), 868–877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meredith, L. S., Mendel, P., Pearson, M., Wu, S. Y., Joyce, G., Straus, J. B., et al. (2006). Implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for treating depression in primary care. Psychiatric Services, 57(1), 48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. National Institutes of Health. (1983). Consensus development program staff: Assessing the NIH consensus development program: Study design. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Pincus, H. A., Pechura, C., Keyser, D., Bachman, J., & Houtsinger, J. K. (2006). Depression in primary care: Learning lessons in a national quality improvement program. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 2–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rost, K., Fortney, J., Fischer, E., & Smith, J. (2002). Use, quality, and outcomes of care for mental health: The rural perspective. Medical Care Research and Review, 59(3), 231–265. discussion 266–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubenstein, L. V., Meredith, L. S., Parker, L. E., Gordon, N. P., Hickey, S. C., Oken, C., et al. (2006). Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: A randomized experiment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(10), 1027–1035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoenbaum, M., Unützer, J., Sherbourne, C. D., Duan, N., Rubenstein, L. V., Miranda, J., et al. (2001). Cost-effectiveness of practiced-initiated quality improvement for depression: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(11), 1325–1330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sherbourne, C. D., Wells, K. B., Duan, N., Miranda, J., Unutzer, J., Jaycox, L., et al. (2001). Long-term effectiveness of disseminating quality improvement for depression in primary care. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(7), 696–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas, M. R., Waxmonsky, J. A., McGinnis, G. F., & Barry, C. L. (2006). Realigning clinical and economic incentives to support depression management within a medicaid population: The Colorado access experience. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 26–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, J. W., Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., et al. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(22), 2836–2845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. (1999). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institues of Health, National Institutes of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  41. Wells, K. B., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Meredith, L., Unutzer, J., et al. (2000). Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(2), 212–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wells, K., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Ettner, S., Duan, N., Miranda, J., et al. (2004). Five-year impact of quality improvement for depression: Results of a group-level randomized controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(4), 378–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RAND Corporation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa S. Meredith
    • 1
  • Robert B. Branstrom
    • 2
  • Francisca Azocar
    • 2
  • Ruth Fikes
    • 3
  • Susan L. Ettner
    • 4
  1. 1.RAND CorporationSanta MonicaUSA
  2. 2.Research and EvaluationOptum Health Behavioral SolutionsSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.College Health IPACerritosUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services ResearchDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations