Abstract
Purpose
Within the mental health system, there are two distinct service models for adults who have severe mental illness and are homeless: one prioritizes treatment before accessing permanent housing (Treatment First) while the other provides permanent housing upfront followed by clinical support (Housing First). Investigating front-line providers working within these two models affords an opportunity to learn more about their implementation from an insider perspective, thus shedding light on whether actual practice is consistent with or contrary to these program models’ contrasting philosophical values.
Methods
Forty-one providers were recruited from four agencies as part of a NIMH funded qualitative study. Multiple, in-depth interviews lasting 30–45 min were conducted with providers that explored working within these agencies. Thematic analysis was utilized to compare the views of 20 providers working in Housing First versus the 21 providers working in Treatment First programs.
Results
Providers viewed housing as a priority but differences emerged between Treatment First and Housing First providers along three major themes: the centrality of housing, engaging consumers through housing, and (limits to...) a right to housing.
Conclusion
Ironically, this study revealed that providers working within Treatment First programs were consumed with the pursuit of housing, whereas Housing First providers focused more on clinical concerns since consumers already had housing. Clearly, how programs position permanent housing has very different implications for how providers understand their work, the pressures they encounter, and how they prioritize client goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, M. (2003). Waking Rip van Winkle: Why developments in the last 20 years should teach the mental health system not to use housing as a tool of coercion. Behav Sci Law, 21(4), 503–521.
Bond, G., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K., & Latimer, E. (2001). Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingredients and impact on patients. Review article. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 9, 141–159.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Dearing, J. W. (2008). Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 99–108.
Dordick, G. A. (2002). Recovering from homelessness: Determining the “quality of sobriety” in a transitional housing program. Qualitative Sociology, 25(1), 7–33.
Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C., & Wallach, M. A. (1991). Homelessness and dual diagnosis. American Psychologist, 36, 1149–1158.
Hopper, K., & Barrow, S. M. (2003). Two genealogies of supported housing and their implications for outcome assessment. Psychiatric Services, 54(1), 50–54.
Hopper, K., Jost, J., Hay, H., Welber, S., & Haugland, G. (1997). Homelessness, severe mental illness, and the institutional circuit. Psychiatric Services, 48, 659–665.
Kertesz, S. G., Crouch, K., Milby, J., Cusimano, R. A., & Schumacher, J. (2009). Housing First for homeless persons with active addiction: Are we overreaching? The Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 1–52.
Leff, H. S., Chow, C. M., Pepin, R., Conley, J., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2009). Does one size fit all? What we can and can’t learn from a meta-analysis of housing models for persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 60(4), 473–482.
Locke, G., Khadduri, J., O’Hara, A. (2007). Housing models. In D. Dennis, G. Locke, J. Khadduri (Eds.). National Symposium on Homelessness Research. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/homelessness/symposium07/locke/index.htm.
Matejkowski, J., & Draine, J. (2009). Investigating the impact of housing first on ACT fidelity. Community Mental Health Journal, 45(1), 6–11.
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (2003). Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832.
Newman, S. J. (2001). Housing attributes and serious mental illness: Implications for research and practice. Psychiatric Services, 52(10), 1309–1317.
O’Hara, A. (2007). Housing for people with mental illness: Update of a report to the President’s New Freedom Commission. Psychiatric Services, 58, 907–913.
Onken, S. J., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R. O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatr Rehabil J, 31(1), 9–22.
Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Padgett, D. K., Gulcur, L., & Tsemberis, S. (2006). Housing first services for people who are homeless with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(1), 74–83.
Piat, M., Lesage, A., Boyer, R., Dorvil, H., Couture, A., Grenier, G., et al. (2008). Housing for persons with serious mental illness: Consumer and provider preferences. Psychiatric Services, 59(9), 1011–1017.
Ridgway, P., & Zipple, A. M. (1990). The paradigm shift in residential services: From the linear continuum to supported housing approaches. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13(4), 11–31.
Robbins, P. C., Petrila, J., Le Melle, S., & Monahan, J. (2006). The use of housing as leverage to increase adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(2), 226–236.
Rog, D. J. (2004). The evidence on supported housing. Psychiatr Rehabil J, 27(4), 334–344.
Salyers, M. P., & Tsemberis, S. (2007). ACT and recovery: Integrating evidence-based practice and recovery orientation on assertive community treatment teams. Community Mental Health Journal, 43(6), 619–641.
SAMHSA, (2006). National Consensus Statement on Mental Health Recovery [Brochure]. Retrieved May 2, 2010 from http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/sma05-4129/.
Stanhope, V., Henwood, B. F., & Padgett, D. K. (2009). Understanding service disengagement from the perspective of case managers. Psychiatric Services, 60(4), 459–464.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2003). Blueprint for change: Ending Chronic Homelessness for persons with serious mental illnesses and co- occurring substance use disorders. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-04-3870, Rockville, MD.
Sylvestre, J., Nelson, G., Sabloff, A., & Peddle, S. (2007). Housing for people with serious mental illness: A comparison of values and research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1–2), 125–137.
Trattner, W. I. (1998). From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America (6th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Tsemberis, S. J., Moran, L., Shinn, M., Asmussen, S. M., & Shern, D. L. (2003). Consumer preference programs for individuals who are homeless and have psychiatric disabilities: A drop-in center and a supported housing program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3–4), 305–317.
Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L., & Nakae, M. (2004). Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 651–656.
Wong, Y. L. I., & Stanhope, V. (2009). Conceptualizing community: A comparison of neighborhood characteristics of supportive housing for persons with psychiatric and developmental disabilities. Social Science and Medicine, 68(8), 1376–1387.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants 5F31MH083372 and R01 69865 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The authors report no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henwood, B.F., Stanhope, V. & Padgett, D.K. The Role of Housing: A Comparison of Front-Line Provider Views in Housing First and Traditional Programs. Adm Policy Ment Health 38, 77–85 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0303-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0303-2