The Electronic Medical Record: Optimizing Human not Computer Capabilities

Original Paper

Abstract

The widespread adoption of computerized medical records provides medical administrators and payers the means to promote more standardized and thorough medical records by insuring clinicians complete mandatory screens, history and physical templates, and formatted treatment plans. But there is a dearth of evidence that such measures, whether computerized or not, improve clinical outcomes and reason to suspect that they may impede care. While these measures maximize the computer’s capabilities they are insensitive to human capabilities. A series of ‘check-offs’, ‘fill-ins’ and ‘drop-downs’ might facilitate quality assurance activities, but such standardized measures can interfere with the clinicians’ processing of information into narrative structures that are necessary for memory and decision making. Computerization does not necessitate this standardization. The adoption of an electronic medical record could provide the opportunity to move beyond standardized measures that were developed to oversee written records and instead harness the computers’ capabilities to promote the unique, specific, and narrative quality of the clinical encounter.

Keywords

Electronic medical record Mental health screening Treatment planning Computerization Clinical narrative 

References

  1. Bolger-Harris, H., Schattner, P., & Saunders, M. (2008). Using computer based templates for chronic disease management. Australian Family Physician, 37, 285–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. (1994). Prevention of suicide. http://www.ctfphc.org/Full_Text/Ch40full.htm. Accessed 1/30/2009.
  3. Gilbody, S., Sheldon, T., & House, A. (2008). Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: A meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178, 997–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbody, S., Sheldon, T., & Wessely, S. (2006). Should we screen for depression? British Medical Journal, 332, 1027–1030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Henry, S. B., Holzemer, W. L., & Reilly, C. A. (1994). The relationship between type of care planning system and patient outcomes in hospitalized AIDS patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 691–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jha, A. K., Perlin, J. B., Kizer, K. W., & Dudley, R. A. (2003). Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs health care system on the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2218–2227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Luchins, D. J. (2008). Improving care, improving performance or just improving numbers. Psychiatric Services, 59, 1328–1330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Muhr, T. (1997). ATLASti 4.1 user’s manual and reference (version 4.1). Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
  10. Neilson, T., Peet, M., Ledsham, R., & Poole, J. (1996). Does the nursing care plan help in the management of psychiatric risk? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 1201–1206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Redelmeier, D. A., Tu, J. V., Schull, M. J., Ferris, L. E., & Hux, J. E. (2001). Problems for clinical judgment: 2. Obtaining a reliable past medical history. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164, 809–813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stancliffe, R. J., Hayden, M. F., & Lakin, K. C. (1999). Effectiveness and quality of individual planning in residential settings: An analysis of outcomes. Mental Retardation, 37, 104–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information used in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and process in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. US Preventive Services Task Force. (2001–2004). Screening for suicide risk: Recommendations and rationale. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/suicide/suicideerr.htm. Accessed 1/30/2009.

Copyright information

© Veterans Administration  2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chief Mental Health ResearchJesse Brown VAMCChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Clinical PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations