Service Characteristics and Counseling Outcomes: Lessons from a Cross-Site Evaluation of Crisis Counseling After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma
The 2005 hurricane season was the worst on record, resulting in disaster declarations and the implementation of federally-funded crisis counseling programs in five states. As part of a larger cross-site evaluation of these programs, data from 2,850 participant surveys, 805 provider surveys, and 132,733 encounter logs (submitted from 3 weeks before to 3 weeks after the participant surveys) were aggregated to the county level (N = 50) and used to test hypotheses regarding factors that influence program performance. County-level outcomes (aggregate ratings of participants’ perceived benefits) improved as service intensity, service intimacy, and frequency of psychological referrals increased and as provider job stress decreased. The percent of providers with advanced degrees was indirectly related to participants’ perceived benefits by increasing service intensity and referral frequency. The results yielded recommendations for achieving excellence in disaster mental health programs.
KeywordsDisaster Mental health services Crisis counseling Program evaluation
- Flynn, B. (1994). Mental health services in large scale disasters: An overview of the Crisis Counseling Program. NCP Clinical Quarterly, 4, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Gibson, L., Hamblen, J., Zvolensky, M., & Vujanovic, A. (2006). Evidence-based treatments for traumatic stress: An overview of the research literature with an emphasis on disaster settings. In F. Norris, S. Galea, M. Friedman, & P. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 208–225). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Norris, F. (2007). Cross-site evaluation of the Crisis Counseling Program: 2005 Hurricanes (Katrina, Wilma, Rita), final report. White River Junction, VT: National Center for PTSD.Google Scholar
- Norris, F., & Bellamy, N. (2009). Evaluation of a national effort to reach Hurricane Katrina survivors and evacuees: The Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi:10.1007/s10488-009-0217-z.
- Norris, F., Hamblen, J., Watson, P., Ruzek, J., Gibson, L., & Pfefferbaum, B. (2006). Understanding and creating systems of postdisaster care: A case study of New York’s mental health system’s response to the World Trade Center Disaster. In C. Ritchie, P. Watson, M. Friedman, et al. (Eds.), Mental health intervention following disasters or mass violence. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Rosen, C., & Young, H. (2005). Quantitative analysis of archival data from crisis counseling grants. In F. Norris, C. Rosen, C. Elrod, H. Young, L. Gibson, & J. Hamblen (Eds.), Retrospective 5-year evaluation of the Crisis Counseling Program (pp. B9–B42). White River Junction, VT: National Center for PTSD.Google Scholar
- Rosen, C., Young, H., & Norris, F. (2006). On a road paved with good intentions, you still need a compass: Monitoring and evaluating disaster mental health services. In C. Ritchie, P. J. Watson, & M. J. Friedman (Eds.), Mental health intervention following disasters or mass violence (pp. 206–226). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Wee, D., & Myers, D. (2002). Stress response of mental health workers following disaster: The Oklahoma City bombing. In C. Figley (Ed.), Treating compassion fatigue (pp. 57–83). New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
- Young, H., & Donahue, S. (2005). Focus groups on data collection tools. In F. Norris, C. Rosen, C. Elrod, & H. Young (Eds.), Retrospective 5-year evaluation of the Crisis Counseling Program (pp. E45–E50). White River Junction, VT: National Center for PTSD.Google Scholar