Advertisement

Predicting Utilization of Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions with Organizational, Service-Provider and Client Variables

  • Matthew R. SandersEmail author
  • Ronald J. Prinz
  • Cheri J. Shapiro
Article

Abstract

Multidisciplinary service providers (N = 611) who underwent training in the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program participated in a structured interview 6 months following training to determine their level of post-training program use and to identify any facilitators and barriers to program use. Findings revealed that practitioners who had received training in Group Triple P, received positive client feedback, had experienced only minor barriers to implementation, and had consulted with other Triple P practitioners following training were more likely to become high users of the program. Practitioners were less likely to use the program when they had lower levels of confidence in delivering Triple P and in consulting with parents in general, had difficulties in incorporating Triple P into their work, and where there was low workplace support. These findings highlight the importance of considering the broader post training work environment of service providers as a determinant of subsequent program use.

Keywords

Parenting interventions Dissemination Program use Barriers to implementation Workplace support Triple P 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper was supported by grants U17/CCU422317 and 1R18CE001340 to Prinz and Sanders from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of James Kirby in the preparation and editing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 411–419. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0121-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backer, T. E., Liberman, R. P., & Kuehnl, T. G. (1986). Dissemination and adoption of innovative psychosocial interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 111–118. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.54.1.111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biglan, A., & Taylor, T. K. (2000). Increasing the use of science to improve child-rearing. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 207–226. doi: 10.1023/A:1007083203280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conor-Smith, J. K., & Weisz, J. R. (2003). Applying treatment outcome research in clinical practice: Techniques for adapting interventions to the real world. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8(1), 3–10. doi: 10.1111/1475-3588.00038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., et al. (2008). Assessing the organizational social context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1–2), 98–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hawley, K. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2002). Increasing the relevance of evidence-based treatment review to practitioners and consumers. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(2), 225–230. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/9.2.225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Schereer, D. G., & Hanely, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herscell, A. D., McNeil, C. B., & McNeil, D. W. (2004). Clinical child psychology’s progress in disseminating empirically supported treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 267–288. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mihalopoulos, C., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., Murphy-Brennan, M., & Carter, R. (2007). Does the Triple P-Positive parenting program provide value for money? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(3), 239–246. doi: 10.1080/00048670601172723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ollendick, T. H., & Davis, T. E. (2004). Empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents: Where to from here? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 289–294. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pentz, M. (2004). Form follows function: Designs for prevention effectiveness and diffusion research. Prevention Science, 5, 23–29. doi: 10.1023/B:PREV.0000013978.00943.30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2007). Adopting a population-level approach to parenting and family support. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(6), 739–749. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0123-3.
  14. Rogers, E. M. (2000). Diffusion theory: A theoretical approach to promote community-level change. In J. L. Peterson & R. J. DiClemente (Eds.), Handbook of HIV prevention (pp. 57–65). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Sanders, M. R. (1999). Triple P positive parenting program: Towards and empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavioral and emotional problems in children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 71–90. doi: 10.1023/A:1021843613840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sanders, M. R. (2008). The Triple P-positive parenting program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 506–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, K. M. T. (2003a). Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the Triple P-positive parenting program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, M. R., Murphy-Brennan, M., & McAuliffe, C. (2003b). The development, evaluation and dissemination of a training programme for general practitioners in evidence-based parent consultation skills. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 5, 13–20.Google Scholar
  19. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Rinaldis, M., Firman, D., & Baig, N. (2007). Using household survey data to inform policy decisions regarding the delivery of evidence-based parenting interventions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(6), 768–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00725.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seng, A. C., Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2006). The role of training variables in effective dissemination of evidence-based parenting interventions. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 8, 20–28.Google Scholar
  21. Shapiro, C.J., Prinz, R.J., & Sanders, M.R. (2007). Population-wide parenting intervention training: Initial feasibility. Journal of Child and Family Studies, published online 28 September.Google Scholar
  22. Silverman, W. K., & Kurtines, W. M. (2004). Research progress on effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of empirically supported treatments: Integrating theory and research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 295–299. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner, K. M. T., & Sanders, M. R. (2006). Dissemination of evidence-based parenting and family support strategies: Learning from the Triple P-positive parenting program system approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 176–193. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wandersman, A. (2003). Community science: Bridging the gap between science and practice with community-centred models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 227–242. doi: 10.1023/A:1023954503247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weisz, J. R., Chu, B. C., & Polo, A. J. (2004). Treatment dissemination and evidence-based practice: Strengthening intervention through clinician-researcher collaboration. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 300–307. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weisz, J. R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direction comparisons. The American Psychologist, 6, 671–689. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfe, J. (1999). Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice: Lessons from medical practitioners. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 445–448. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/6.4.445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew R. Sanders
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ronald J. Prinz
    • 2
  • Cheri J. Shapiro
    • 2
  1. 1.Parenting and Family Support CentreThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations