Advertisement

Therapist Turnover and New Program Sustainability in Mental Health Clinics as a Function of Organizational Culture, Climate, and Service Structure

  • Charles Glisson
  • Sonja K. Schoenwald
  • Kelly Kelleher
  • John Landsverk
  • Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood
  • Stephen Mayberg
  • Philip Green
  • The Research Network on Youth Mental Health
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study incorporates organizational theory and organizational characteristics in examining issues related to the successful implementation of mental health services. Following the theoretical foundations of socio-technical and cultural models of organizational effectiveness, organizational climate, culture, legal and service structures, and workforce characteristics are examined as correlates of therapist turnover and new program sustainability in a nationwide sample of mental health clinics. Results of General Linear Modeling (GLM) with the organization as the unit of analysis revealed that organizations with the best climates as measured by the Organizational Social Context (OSC) profiling system, had annual turnover rates (10%) that were less than half the rates found in organizations with the worst climates (22%). In addition, organizations with the best culture profiles sustained new treatment or service programs over twice as long (50 vs. 24 months) as organizations with the worst cultures. Finally, clinics with separate children’s services units had higher turnover rates than clinics that served adults and children within the same unit. The findings suggest that strategies to support the implementation of new mental health treatments and services should attend to organizational culture and climate, and to the compatibility of organizational service structures with the demand characteristics of treatments.

Keywords

Organizational culture Organizational climate Organizational social context OSC Therapist turnover Sustainability 

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1958). Some problems in conceptualizing organizational climate: A case study of a bank. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom C. P. M., Peterson M. F. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. (1960). Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 25, 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowd, K., Kinsey, S., Wheeless, S., Thissen, R. Richardson, J., Suresh, R., et al. (2004). National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW), Combined Waves 1–4, Data File User’s Manual, Restricted Release Version. Research Triangle Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Caliber Associates, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. Fleishman, E. A. (1953). Leadership climate, human relations training, and supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 6, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glisson, C. (2007). Organizational climate and service outcomes in child welfare systems. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  10. Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 855–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glisson, C., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of organizational culture and climate on the access to mental health care in child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(4), 433–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. L. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 767–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S. K., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., & Green, P. (2008). Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for implementation research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1).Google Scholar
  15. Glisson, C., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2005). The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Mental Health Services Research, 7(4), 243–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Handy, C. G. (1976). Understanding organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Kahn, R. L., & Boulding, E. (1964). Power and conflict in organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, D. K., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Litwak, E., & Hylton, L. F. (1962). Interorganizational analysis: A hypothesis on co-ordinating agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGregor, D. M. (1957). The human side of enterprise. Management Review, 46, 22–28, 88–92.Google Scholar
  22. NSCAW Research Group (2002). Methodological lessons from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being: The first three years of the USA’s first national probability study of children and families investigated for abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pettigrew, A. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  25. Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Eds.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rousseau, D. M. (1977). Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schein, E. H. (2000). Sense and nonsense about culture and climate. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. xxiii–xxx). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Schneider, B. (1990). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, B. (2000). The psychological life of organizations. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. xvii–xxi). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Schoenwald, S. K., Chapman, J. E., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Landsverk, J., Stevens, J., Glisson, C., & Rolls-Reutz, J. (2008). A survey of the infrastructure for children’s mental health services: Implications for the implementation of empirically supported treatments (EBTs). Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1).Google Scholar
  32. Schorr, L. B. (1997). Common purpose. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, W. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (1967). Organization theory: A structural and behavioral analysis. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Selznick, P. (1949a). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  35. Selznick, P. (1949b). TVA and the grass roots. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Simon, H. A. (1946). The proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Trist, E. L., Higgin, G. W., Murray, H., & Pollock, A. B. (1963). Organization choice: Capabilities of groups at the coal face under changing technologies; the loss re-discovery and transformation of a work tradition. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  40. Vintner, R.D. (1963). Analysis of treatment organizations. Social Work, 8, 3–15.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M. (1922). Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth, & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 196–244). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wieland, G. F., & Ullrich, R. A. (1976). Organizations – Behavior, design and change. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
  43. Woodward, J. (1958). Management and technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  44. Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Yafa, S. (2004). Big cotton: How a humble fiber created fortunes, wrecked civilizations, and put America on the map. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Glisson
    • 1
  • Sonja K. Schoenwald
    • 2
  • Kelly Kelleher
    • 3
  • John Landsverk
    • 4
  • Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood
    • 5
  • Stephen Mayberg
    • 6
  • Philip Green
    • 1
  • The Research Network on Youth Mental Health
    • 7
  1. 1.Children’s Mental Health Services Research CenterUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Family Services Research CenterMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.Children’s Research InstituteOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Child and Adolescent Services Research CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  5. 5.New York State Psychiatric InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Calilfornia Department of Mental HealthSacramentoUSA
  7. 7.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations