Advancing the Science of Implementation: A Workshop Summary
- 291 Downloads
While much has been written about reducing the gap between science and practice, relatively little progress has been made to develop a sound knowledge base underlying implementation of effective interventions. To respond to these challenges, the National Institute of Mental Health organized a workshop entitled, “Advancing the Science of Implementation: Improving the Fit between Mental Health Intervention Development and Service Systems.” Over the 2-day workshop, a multi-disciplinary group of intervention and services researchers, implementers, methodologists, organizational theorists, and clinicians was brought together in an “engaged scholarship” * format composed of small and large-group settings to discuss the development of a sound knowledge base on the implementation of evidence-based practices. Using three specific intervention categories, participants identified constructs seen to be important to the implementation of the model in real-world systems. Following each breakout session, attendees reconvened for a full group discussion and brief presentations were conducted to highlight interventions in the areas of organizational measures, social network analysis and field opportunities. This summary describes some of the constructs relevant to implementation research and presents research questions that, if studied, will lay a solid foundation for implementation research.
KeywordsImplementation science Evidence-based practices
- Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of medical informatics (pp. 65–70). Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
- Chambers, D. A. (2007). Disseminating and implementing evidence-based practices for mental health. In M. Welch-Ross & L. Fasig (Eds.), Handbook on communicating and disseminating behavioral science. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (1999). Evidence into practice? An exploratory analysis of the interpretation of evidence. In A. Mark & S. Dopson (Eds.), Organisational behaviour in health care. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
- Huby, G., & Fairhurst, K. (1998). How do general practitioners use evidence? A study in the context of Lothian health policy and practitioners’ use of statin drugs. Final report to CSO, August, 1998. Edinburgh: Primary Care Research Group, Department of General Practice, The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- Kimberly, J. & Cook, J. M. (2007). Organizational measurement and the implementation of innovations in mental health services. AMHP & MHSR.Google Scholar
- Mendel, P., Meredity, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2007). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework of dissemination in health services research. AMHP & MHSR.Google Scholar
- National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Workgroup on Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology. (2006). The road ahead: Research partnerships to transform services. Accessed on the web at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/roadahead.pdf Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.
- National Advisory Mental Health Council. (1999). Bridging science and service: A report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Clinical Treatment and Services Research Workgroup. (NIH Publication No. 99-4353). Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
- NIH (2006). Program annoucement (PAR-07-086) Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01). Accessed on February 22, 2007 at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/pa-files/PAR-07–086.html.
- President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final Report. (DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832). Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, & Johnson (2005). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1995). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar