Advertisement

Predictors of Practitioner Self-reported Use of Evidence-Based Practices: Practitioner Training, Clinical Setting, and Attitudes Toward Research

  • Timothy D. Nelson
  • Ric G. Steele
Original Paper

Abstract

In light of the recent movement toward evidence-based practice (EBP) in mental health services, practitioner adoption of EBPs in clinical settings has emerged as an important area for study. This paper reports on the results of a national online survey of mental health practitioners in an attempt to identify correlates of self-reported EBP use in practice. The survey consisted of 214 mental health practitioners from 15 states drawn from a diverse set of clinical settings and representing a variety of theoretical orientations. The results indicated that practitioner training (i.e., taking a class in EBPs), the perceived openness of the clinical setting toward EBPs, and the practitioner’s attitudes toward treatment research were significant predictors of self-reported EBP use. The relationship between clinical setting and EBP use was partially mediated by attitudes toward treatment research. Negative attitudes toward treatment research partially mediated the relationship between practitioner training and self-reported EBP use. The findings are presented within the context of efforts to increase EBP use in clinical settings and implications for clinical training, treatment research, and EBP dissemination efforts are discussed.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice Practitioner attitudes Training Institutional culture Treatment research Dissemination 

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence- based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6, 61–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addis, M. E., & Krasnow, A. D. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 331–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association (2002). Guidelines and procedures for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association (2005). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. Accessed at http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpstatement.pdf, 10 February 2006.
  5. Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beutler, L. E., Williams, R. E., Wakefield, & P. J., Entwistle, S. R. (1995). Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 984–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, P. J., Read, J. P., & Kahler, C. W. (2003). Comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders: Treatment outcomes and the role of coping. In P. Brown & P. Ouimette (Eds.), Trauma and substance abuse: Causes, consequences, and treatment of comorbid disorders. (pp. 171–188). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett-Johnson, S. B., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18.Google Scholar
  12. Flannery-Schroeder, E., Suveg, C., Safford, S., Kendall, P. C., & Webb, A. (2004). Comorbid externalising disorders and child anxiety treatment outcomes. Behaviour Change, 21, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glisson, C., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2005). The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Mental Health Services Research, 7, 243–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusions of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoagwood, K., & Olin, S. (2002). The NIMH blueprint for change report: Research priorities in child and adolescent mental health. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 760–767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kazdin, A. E. (1997). A model for developing effective treatments: Progression and interplay of theory, research, and practice. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 114–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kazdin, A. E., Siegel. T. C., & Bass, D. (1990). Drawing upon clinical practice to inform research on child and adolescent psychotherapy: A survey of practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lenze, E. J., Mulsant, B. H., Dew, M. A., Shear, M., Houck, P., Pollock, B. G., et al. (2003). Good treatment outcomes in late-life depression with comorbid anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 77, 247–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Institute of Mental Health (1998). Bridging science and service: A report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Clinical Treatment and Services Research Workgroup. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, T. D., & Steele, R. G. (2006). Beyond efficacy and effectiveness: A multifaceted approach to treatment evaluation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, T. D., Steele, R. G., & Mize, J. A. (2006). Practitioner attitudes toward evidence-based practice: Themes and challenges. Administrative Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832. Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  24. Ollendick, T. H., & Davis, T. E. (2004). Empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents: Where to from here? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Persons, J. B., & Silberschatz, G. (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel test. Accessed at: http://www.unc.edu/∼preacher/sobel/sobel.htm, 17 April 2006.
  27. Schoenwald S. K, & Hoagwood K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1190–1197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A, Nuro, K. F., & Carroll, K. M. (2005). We don’t train in vain: A dissemination trail of three strategies of training clinicians in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 106–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith-Boydston, J. M., & Nelson, T. D. (in press). Adoption of EBTs in community settings: Obstacles and opportunities. In R. G. Steele, D. Elkin, & M. C. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of evidence based therapies for children and adolescents..Google Scholar
  30. Stirman, S. W., Crits-Christoph, P., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2004). Achieving successful dissemination of empirically supported psychotherapies: A synthesis of dissemination theory. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (n.d.) (2005). Mental health services locator. Retrieved 10 December 2005, from http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/databases.Google Scholar
  32. Woody, S. R., Weisz, J., & McLean, C. (2005). Empirically supported treatments: 10 years later. The Clinical Psychologist, 58, 5–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.2006 Dole Human Development CenterUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations