Why Some Clinicians Use Outcome Measures and Others Do Not

  • Derek R. HatfieldEmail author
  • Benjamin M. Ogles
Original Paper


Due to their potential as helpful clinical tools, it is necessary to understand the reasons why certain practitioners are currently using outcome measures and certain others are not. This study investigated the reasons why clinicians use outcome measures based upon factors such as work setting, theoretical orientation and source of payment. Similar analyses were conducted for reasons that clinicians do not use outcome measures. Findings suggest that several practical barriers are the primary reasons for not using outcome measures, although a subset of clinicians have additional concerns. Results also emphasized the need for clinicians to be trained on how to maximize the clinical benefits of formalized outcome assessment.


Outcome Outcome measure Clinician differences Assessment Client change 


  1. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., Benson, L., Connell, J., Audin, K., & McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 184–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickman, L., Rosof-Williams, J., Salzer, M. S., Summerfelt, W. T., Noser, K., Wilson, S. J., & Karver, M. S. (2000). What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawes, R. M. (1996). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Garland, A. F., Kruse, M., & Aarons, G. A. (2003). Clinicians and outcome measurement: What’s the use? Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30(4), 393–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hannan, C., Lambert, M., Harmon, C., Nielson, S., Smart, D., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatfield, D. R. & Ogles, B. M. (2006). The influence of outcome measures in assessing client change and treatment decisions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 325–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kordy, H., Hannöver, W., & Richard, M. (2001). Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy: The Struttgart–Heidelberg Model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 173–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambert, M. J. (2001). Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: Introduction to the special section on patient-focused research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 147–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambert, M., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J., & Hawkins, E. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology,61(2), 165–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Hawkins, E. J., Nielson, S. L., et al. (2002). Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client treatment response: A replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lueger, R. J., Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Anderson, E. E., & Grissom, G. (2001). Assessing treatment progress of individual patients using expected treatment response models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 150–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (New Preface). Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield/Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  15. Phelps, R., Eisman, E. J., & Kohout, J. (1998). Psychological practice and managed care: Results of the CAPP practitioner survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations